The current utilization of the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) in isolated or combined total knee arthroplasty populations
Tóm tắt
Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are essential for clinical research and patient-centric care because they allow us to capture patient perspectives on their health condition. In knee arthroplasty, PROMs are frequently used to assess the risks and benefits of new interventions, surgical approaches, and other management strategies. A few examples of PROMs used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) include the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) (collectively referred to as “legacy” PROMs). More recently, attention has been brought to another PROM called the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). PROMIS was developed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and has over 300 domains assessing various aspects of patient health, including pain, physical function, and mental health. With the use of PROMIS increasing in TKA literature, there is a need to review the advancements being made in understanding and applying PROMIS for this population. Thus, the purpose of this study is to provide insight on the utilization, advantages, and disadvantages of PROMIS within the field of knee arthroplasty and to provide a comparison to legacy PROMs.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Gagnier JJ (2017) Patient reported outcomes in orthopaedics. J Orthop Res 35:2098–2108. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23604
Weldring T, Smith SMS (2013) Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights 6:61–68. https://doi.org/10.4137/HSI.S11093
Ahern S, Ruseckaite R, Ackerman IN (2017) Collecting patient-reported outcome measures. Intern Med J 47:1454–1457. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.13633
Kluzek S, Dean B, Wartolowska KA (2021) Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as proof of treatment efficacy. BMJ Evid-Based Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111573
Perez JL, Mosher ZA, Watson SL et al (2017) Readability of orthopaedic patient-reported outcome measures: is there a fundamental failure to communicate? Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:1936–1947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5339-0
Canfield M, Savoy L, Cote MP, Halawi MJ (2020) Patient-reported outcome measures in total joint arthroplasty: defining the optimal collection window. Arthroplast Today 6:62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2019.10.003
PROMIS Health Organization. What is PROMIS? https://www.promishealth.org/57461-2/. Accessed 16 Apr 2022
HealthMeasures intro to PROMIS. https://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurement-systems/promis/intro-to-promis
National institutes of health patient-reported outcomes measurement information systems (PROMIS). https://commonfund.nih.gov/promis/index
Browning RB, Alter TD, Clapp IM et al (2021) Patients require less time to complete preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) than legacy patient-reported outcome measures. Arthrosc Sport Med Rehabil 3:e1413–e1419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asmr.2021.06.011
Gulledge CM, Smith DG, Ziedas A et al (2019) Floor and ceiling effects, time to completion, and question burden of PROMIS CAT domains among shoulder and knee patients undergoing nonoperative and operative treatment. JBJS Open Access. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00015
Iyer S, Koltsov JCB, Steinhaus M et al (2019) A prospective, psychometric validation of national institutes of health patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function, pain interference, and upper extremity computer adaptive testing in cervical spine patients: successes and key limitations. Spine 44:1539–1549. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003133
Tyser AR, Beckmann J, Franklin JD et al (2014) Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity. J Hand Surg Am 39:2047-2051.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.06.130
Hung M, Baumhauer JF, Latt LD et al (2013) Validation of PROMIS ® physical function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3466–3474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-3097-1
Fliege H, Becker J, Walter OB et al (2005) Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT). Qual Life Res 14:2277–2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-6651-9
Seo DG (2017) Overview and current management of computerized adaptive testing in licensing/certification examinations. J Educ Eval Health Prof 14:17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.17
Lizzio VA, Blanchett J, Borowsky P et al (2019) Feasibility of PROMIS CAT administration in the ambulatory sports medicine clinic with respect to cost and patient compliance: a single-surgeon experience. Orthop J Sport Med 7:2325967118821875. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118821875
Khalil LS, Darrith B, Franovic S et al (2020) Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global health short forms demonstrate responsiveness in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 35:1540–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.032
Padilla JA, Rudy HL, Gabor JA et al (2019) Relationship between the patient-reported outcome measurement information system and traditional patient-reported outcomes for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplast 34:265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.012
Heng M, Tang X, Schalet BD et al (2021) Can the knee outcome and osteoarthritis score (KOOS) function subscale be linked to the PROMIS physical function to crosswalk equivalent scores? Clin Orthop Relat Res 479:2653–2664. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001857
Tang X, Schalet BD, Heng M et al (2022) Linking the KOOS-PS to PROMIS physical function in knee patients evaluated for surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 30:281–289. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00461
Austin DC, Torchia MT, Werth PM et al (2019) A one-question patient-reported outcome measure is comparable to multiple-question measures in total knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast 34:2937–2943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.023
Shim J, Hamilton DF (2019) Comparative responsiveness of the PROMIS-10 global health and EQ-5D questionnaires in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 101-B:832–837. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1543.R1
Givens DL, Eskildsen S, Taylor KE et al (2018) Timed up and go test is predictive of patient-reported outcomes measurement information system physical function in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast today 4:505–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2018.07.010
Lawrie CM, Abu-Amer WY, Clohisy JC (2021) Is the patient-reported outcome measurement information system feasible in bundled payment for care improvement total knee arthroplasty patients? J Arthroplast 36:6–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.041
Kortlever JTP, Leyton-Mange A, Keulen MHF et al (2020) PROMIS physical function correlates with KOOS, JR in patients with knee pain. J Knee Surg 33:903–911. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1688780
Ingall E, Klemt C, Melnic CM et al (2021) Impact of preoperative opioid use on patient-reported outcomes after revision total knee arthroplasty: a propensity matched analysis. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1729966
Klemt C, Tirumala V, Oganesyan R et al (2021) Single-stage revision of the infected total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved functional outcomes: a propensity score-matched cohort study. J Arthroplast 36:298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.012
Kagan R, Anderson MB, Christensen JC et al (2018) The recovery curve for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system patient-reported physical function and pain interference computerized adaptive tests after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33:2471–2474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.020
Christensen J, Peters C, Gililland J et al (2021) Physical activity, pain interference and comorbidities relate to PROMIS physical function in younger adults following total knee arthroplasty. Disabil Rehabil 43:3741–3747. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1749944
Darrith B, Khalil LS, Franovic S et al (2021) Preoperative patient-reported outcomes measurement information system global health scores predict patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference in the early postoperative time period after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29:e1417–e1426. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-01288
Hung M, Saltzman CL, Greene T et al (2018) Evaluating instrument responsiveness in joint function: the HOOS JR, the KOOS JR, and the PROMIS PF CAT. J Orthop Res 36:1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23739
Horn ME, George SZ, Goode AP et al (2022) Can patient-reported outcome measurement information system measures differentiate patients who will undergo hip and knee total joint arthroplasty: a retrospective case–control study. J Arthroplast. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.053