The coulombic efficiency of zinc electrowinning in high-purity synthetic electrolytes
Tóm tắt
Measurements of coulombic efficiency (QE) for zinc electrodeposition were carried out under mass transfer-controlled conditions using a rotating disc electrode in synthetic acidic zinc sulphate electrolytes. At 25°C in 0.8 M ZnSO4+1.07 M H2SO4 prepared from reagent grade chemicals, the QE at an aluminium cathode was 95.7–97.6%. In order to study the influence of electrolyte purity on QE several preparation and purification techniques were employed. While different sources of chemicals produced different QEs, the main source of impurities seemed to be the zinc-containing reagent rather than the sulphuric acid. Improvements in purity either had a negligible effect or lowered the QE, indicating that some impurities are beneficial to electrolyte performance. In the purest solutions prepared, an effect due to residual impurities still seemed to be present. The maximum QE obtainable through variation of the three parameters, i.e. temperature, current density and electrode rotation rate, was determined for two electrolytes of different purities; the values of QE obtained were 98.4 and 98.8%, with temperature as the dominant factor. ‘Wark's Rule’ (the dependence of QE on zinc/acid ratio) was obeyed approximately in the purest electrolyte prepared, over a limited range of composition.
Tài liệu tham khảo
C. L. Mantell, ‘Electrochemical Engineering,’ McGraw Hill, New York (1960) p. 216.
R. C. Kerby and T. R. Ingraham, Mines Branch Research Report R243, Dept. of Energy, Mines and Resources, Ottawa, Canada (1971).
H. H. Fukubayashi, T. J. O'Keefe and W. C. Clinton, Bureau of Mines Report of Investigations 7966, US Dept. of the Interior (1974).
D. J. Mackinnon and J. M. Brannen,J. Appl. Electrochem. 7 (1977) 451.
F. R. Foulkes, J. W. Smith, R. Kalia and D. W. Kirk,J. Electrochem. Soc. 128 (1981) 2307.
M. Maja, N. Penazzi, R. Fratesi and G. Roventi,129 (1982) 2695.
A. D'este and R. Guerriero,Montevecchio 16 (1965) 1.
A. P. Saunders and H. I. Philip, NIM Report No. 1906, National Institute for Metallurgy, Randburg, South Africa (1977).
T. R. Ingraham and R. C. Kerby,Can. Met. Quart. 11 (1972) 451.
M. A. Fishman, V. L. Klimenko and K. Ya. Nevedrov,Tsvet. Met. 4 (2) (1963) 30.
U. C. Tainton,Trans. Electrochem. Soc. 41 (1922) 389.
G. N. Znamenskii and V. V. Stender,J. Appl. Chem. USSR 33 (1960) 2692.
A. A. Salin,Tsvet. Met. 2(8) (1961) 29.
I. W. Wark, in ‘Proceedings of the First Australian Conference on Electrochemistry, Sydney and Hobart, 1963’ (edited by J. A. Friend and F. Gutmann), Pergamon Press, London (1965) p. 889.
I. W. Wark,J. Appl. Electrochem. 9 (1979) 721.
G. C. Bratt, in ‘The Aus. I.M.M. Conference, Tasmania, May, 1977’, Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (1977) p. 277.
T. Biegler and D. A. Swift,Hydrometallurgy 6 (1981) 299.
A. T. Kuhn, C. J. Mortimer, G. C. Bond and J. Lindley,J. Electroanal. Chem. 34 (1972) 1.
E. C. Kuehner, R. Alvarez, P. J. Paulsen and T. J. Murphy,Anal. Chem. 44 (1972) 2050.
E. J. Frazer, paper in preparation.
R. D. Johnson, L. D. Palumbo and G. D. J. Smith, paper 25.1 presented at Zinc 83, CIM Metallurgical Society (Hydrometallurgy Section), 13th Annual Hydrometallurgical Meeting, Edmonton and Trail, Canada (1983).
O. L. Davies (ed), ‘The Design and Analysis of Industrial Experiments,’ 2nd edn, Oliver and Boyd, London (1967).
G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter and J. S. Hunter, ‘Statistics for Experimenters,’ Wiley, New York (1978).
E. J. Frazer and T. Lwin, paper in preparation.
A. R. Ault, J. H. Bain, D. J. Palmer and J. B. Pullen, in ‘The Aus. I.M.M. Conference, South Australia, June, 1975’, Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (1975), p. 225.
D. R. Fosnacht and T. J. O'Keefe,Met. Trans. B 14 (1983) 645.