The cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: A comparative analysis of three programs in Latin America

Ahmed, U. A., Bouis, H. E., Gutner, T., & Löfgren, H. (2001). The Egyptian food subsidy system: Structure, performance, and options for reform. Research Report No. 119, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Behrman, 2005, Programme evaluation with unobserved heterogeneity and selective implementation: The Mexican PROGRESA impact on child nutrition, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67, 547, 10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00131.x Behrman, 2005, Progressing through PROGRESA: An impact assessment of a school subsidy experiment in rural Mexico, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54, 237, 10.1086/431263 Besley, 1993, The principles of targeting, 67 Caldés, N., & Coady, D. (2003). A preliminary analysis of the cost structure of Programa de Asignación Familiar (PRAF) in Honduras. Unpublished manuscript, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Caldés, N., Coady, D., & Maluccio, J. A. (2004). The cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: A comparative analysis of three programs in Latin America. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper No. 174, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Caldés, 2005, The cost of conditional cash transfers, Journal of International Development, 17, 151, 10.1002/jid.1142 Coady, D. (2001). An evaluation of the distributional power of PROGRESA’s cash transfers in Mexico. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper 117, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Coady, 2004 Coady, D., Perez, R., & Vera-Llamas, H. (2005). Evaluating the cost of poverty alleviation transfer programs: An illustration based on PROGRESA in Mexico. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper No. 199, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Fiedler, J. L. (2003). A cost analysis of the Honduras community-based integrated child care program. Health, Nutrition, and Population Discussion Paper, World Bank, Washington, DC. Gertler, P. J. (2000). The impact of PROGRESA on health. Final report submitted to PROGRESA, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Grosh, 1994 Hoddinott, 2005, The impact of PROGRESA on food consumption, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 53, 37, 10.1086/423252 IFPRI (International Food Policy Research Institute). (2003). PRAF evaluation: Sixth report. Report submitted to PRAF, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Maluccio, J. A. (2005). Household targeting in practice: The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social. Unpublished manuscript, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Maluccio, J. A., & Flores, R. (2005). Impact evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program: The Nicaraguan Red de Protección Social. Research Report No. 141, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. MNPTSG (MesoAmerica Nutrition Program Targeting Study Group). (2002). Targeting performance of three large-scale, nutrition-oriented, social programs in Central America and Mexico. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 23(2), 162–174. Newman, 1994, Using randomized control designs in evaluating social sector programs in developing countries, World Bank Research Observer, 9, 181, 10.1093/wbro/9.2.181 Schultz, 2004, School subsidies for the poor: Evaluating the Mexican Progresa poverty program, Journal of Development Economics, 74, 199, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.12.009 Skoufias, E. (2005). PROGRESA and its impacts on the welfare of rural households in Mexico. Research Report No. 139, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC. Waters, H. (2000). A review of the literature with applications for conducting cost-effectiveness studies and for advocacy. Unpublished manuscript, Support for Analysis and Research in Africa (SARA) Project, Bureau for Africa, Office of Sustainable Development. World Bank, 1997