The cost-benefit comparisons of China's and India's NDCs based on carbon marginal abatement cost curves

Aguiar, 2016, An overview of the GTAP 9 data base, J. Glob. Econ. Anal., 1, 181, 10.21642/JGEA.010103AF Amann, 2011, Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: modeling and policy applications, Environ. Model. Softw., 26, 1489, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.07.012 Amann, 2020, Reducing global air pollution: the scope for further policy interventions, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 378, 20190331 Amelung, 2019, Human health as a motivator for climate change mitigation: results from four European high-income countries, Glob. Environ. Chang., 57, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.002 Anenberg, 2012, Global air quality and health co-benefits of mitigating near-term climate change through methane and black carbon emission controls, Environ. Health Perspect., 120, 831, 10.1289/ehp.1104301 Bergman, 1991, General equilibrium effects of environmental policy: a CGE-modeling approach, Environ. Resour. Econ., 1, 43, 10.1007/BF00305950 Bernard, 2008, A two-level dynamic game of carbon emission trading between Russia, China, and Annex B countries, J. Econ. Dyn. Control., 32, 1830, 10.1016/j.jedc.2007.07.001 Bhattacharyya, 1996, Applied general equilibrium models for energy studies: a survey, Energy Econ., 18, 145, 10.1016/0140-9883(96)00013-8 Bollen, 2009, Local air pollution and global climate change: a combined cost-benefit analysis, Resour. Energy Econ., 31, 161, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.03.001 BP, 2019 Cai, 2016, Gearing carbon trading towards environmental co-benefits in China: measurement model and policy implications, Glob. Environ. Chang., 39, 275, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.013 Chang, 2020, Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s national emission trading system, Appl. Energy, 261, 12, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114226 Conrad, 1991, The control of CO2 emissions and its economic impact: an AGE model for a German state, Environ. Resour. Econ., 1, 289, 10.1007/BF00367922 Dai, 2018, Aligning renewable energy targets with carbon emissions trading to achieve China’s INDCs: a general equilibrium assessment, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 82, 4121, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.061 Den Elzen, 2019, Are the G20 economies making enough progress to meet their NDC targets?, Energy Policy, 126, 238, 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.027 Deng, 2017, Co-benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation: a review and classification by type, mitigation sector, and geography, Environ. Res. Lett., 12 Dhar, 2017, Electric vehicles and India’s low carbon passenger transport: a long-term co-benefits assessment, J. Clean. Prod., 146, 139, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.111 Eory, 2013, Multiple-pollutant cost-effectiveness of greenhouse gas mitigation measures in the UK agriculture, Environ. Sci. Pol., 27, 55, 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.003 Fawcett, 2015, Can Paris pledges avert severe climate change?, Science, 350, 1168, 10.1126/science.aad5761 Greenblatt, 2016, Assessment of the climate commitments and additional mitigation policies of the United States, Nat. Clim. Chang., 6, 1090, 10.1038/nclimate3125 Groosman, 2011, The ancillary benefits from climate policy in the United States, Environ. Resour. Econ., 50, 585, 10.1007/s10640-011-9483-9 Guo, 2016, Emission path planning based on dynamic abatement cost curve, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 255, 996, 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.023 Hof, 2017, Global and regional abatement costs of nationally determined contributions (NDCs) and of enhanced action to levels well below 2 degrees C and 1.5 degrees C, Environ. Sci. Pol., 71, 30, 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.02.008 IEA, 2011 IEA, 2017 IEA, 2021 IPCC, 2001 IPCC, 2006 IPCC, 2014 Jiang, 2020, The hotspots, reference routes, and research trends of marginal abatement costs: a systematic review, J. Clean. Prod., 252, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119809 Jiang, 2021, How will natural gas market reforms affect carbon marginal abatement costs? Evidence from China, Econ. Syst. Res., 1 Jiang, 2022, Co-benefit comparison of carbon tax, sulfur tax and nitrogen tax: the case of China, Sustain. Prod. Consump., 29, 239, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.10.017 Jiang, 2022, How do demand-side policies contribute to the electrification and decarburization of private transportation in China? A CGE-based analysis, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 175, 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121322 Kesicki, 2011, Marginal abatement cost (MAC) curves: confronting theory and practice, Environ. Sci. Pol., 14, 1195, 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.08.004 Klepper, 2006, Marginal abatement cost curves in general equilibrium: the influence of world energy prices, Resour. Energy Econ., 28, 1, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2005.04.001 Klimont, 2017, Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8681, 10.5194/acp-17-8681-2017 Li, 2019, Air quality improvement co-benefits of low-carbon pathways toward well below the 2 degrees C climate target in China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 5576, 10.1021/acs.est.8b06948 Liang, 2014, Platform for China energy & environmental policy analysis: a general design and its application, Environ. Model. Softw., 51, 195, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.09.032 Liu, 2020 Liu, 2020, Environmental and economic impacts of trade barriers: the example of China-US trade friction, Resour. Energy Econ., 59, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.101144 Massetti, 2011, Carbon tax scenarios for China and India: exploring politically feasible mitigation goals, Polit. Law Econom. Int. Environ. Agr., 11, 209 McFarland, 2006, Incorporating carbon capture and storage technologies in integrated assessment models, Energy Econ., 28, 632, 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.05.016 Michalena, 2018, Challenges for Pacific Small Island developing states in achieving their nationally determined contributions (NDC), Energy Policy, 114, 508, 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.022 MOEFCC, 2015 Morris, 2008 Morris, 2012, Marginal abatement costs and marginal welfare costs for greenhouse gas emissions reductions: results from the EPPA model, Environ. Model. Assess., 17, 325, 10.1007/s10666-011-9298-7 Muller, 2012, The design of optimal climate policy with air pollution co-benefits, Resour. Energy Econ., 34, 696, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2012.07.002 Nam, 2013, Carbon co-benefits of tighter SO2 and NOx regulations in China, Glob. Environ. Chang., 23, 1648, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.003 NDRC, 2015 Paltsev, 2005 Pan, 2017, Exploring fair and ambitious mitigation contributions under the Paris Agreement goals, Environ. Sci. Pol., 74, 49, 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.020 Peng, 2020, The critical role of policy enforcement in achieving health, air quality and climate benefits from India’s clean electricity transition, Environ. Sci. Pol., 54, 11720 Purohit, 2019, Mitigation pathways towards national ambient air quality standards in India, Environ. Int., 133, 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105147 Rao, 2017, Future air pollution in the shared socio-economic pathways, Glob. Environ. Chang., 42, 346, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.012 Rive, 2010, Climate policy in Western Europe and avoided costs of air pollution control, Econ. Model., 27, 103, 10.1016/j.econmod.2009.07.025 Robiou du Pont, 2017, Equitable mitigation to achieve the Paris Agreement goals, Nat. Clim. Chang., 7, 38, 10.1038/nclimate3186 Rogelj, 2016, Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 degrees C, Nature, 534, 631, 10.1038/nature18307 Schleussner, 2016, Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal, Nat. Clim. Chang., 6, 827, 10.1038/nclimate3096 Stern, 2012, Where in the world is it cheapest to cut carbon emissions?, Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 56, 315, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2011.00576.x Sue Wing, 2008, The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: electric power technology detail in a social accounting framework, Energy Econ., 30, 547, 10.1016/j.eneco.2006.06.004 The state council The state council The state council UNEP, 2019 Vandyck, 2018, Air quality co-benefits for human health and agriculture counterbalance costs to meet Paris Agreement pledges, Nat. Commun., 9, 4939, 10.1038/s41467-018-06885-9 Wei, 2018, An integrated assessment of INDCs under shared socioeconomic pathways: an implementation of C (3), Nat. Hazards, 92, 585, 10.1007/s11069-018-3297-9 Wei, 2020, Self-preservation strategy for approaching global warming targets in the post-Paris Agreement era, Nat. Commun., 11, 1624, 10.1038/s41467-020-15453-z Wei, 2021, Pathway comparison of limiting global warming to 2°C, Energy Clim. Chang., 100063, 10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100063 West, 2013, Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health, Nat. Clim. Chang., 3, 885, 10.1038/nclimate2009 Whitesell, 2011 Yang, 2018, Cost-benefit analysis of China’s intended nationally determined contributions based on carbon marginal cost curves, Appl. Energy, 227, 415, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.08.016 Zhang, 2020, Impacts of mechanisms to promote participation in climate mitigation: border carbon adjustments vs uniform tariff measures, Clim. Chang. Econ., 11 Zhou, 2020, Decarbonization pathways and energy investment needs for developing Asia in line with “well below” 2 degrees C, Clim. Pol., 20, 234, 10.1080/14693062.2020.1722606