The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Bone and Joint Journal - Tập 97-B Số 11 - Trang 1493-1499 - 2015
Hemant Pandit1, Thomas W. Hamilton1, C. Jenkins2, Stephen Mellon1, Christopher Dodd2, David Murray3
1NDORMS, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
2Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.
3Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre and NDORMS, University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK.

Tóm tắt

This prospective study reports the 15-year survival and ten-year functional outcome of a consecutive series of 1000 minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford medial UKAs (818 patients, 393 men, 48%, 425 women, 52%, mean age 66 years; 32 to 88). These were implanted by two surgeons involved with the design of the prosthesis to treat anteromedial osteoarthritis and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee, which are recommended indications. Patients were prospectively identified and followed up independently for a mean of 10.3 years (5.3 to 16.6).At ten years, the mean Oxford Knee Score was 40 (standard deviation (sd) 9; 2 to 48): 79% of knees (349) had an excellent or good outcome. There were 52 implant-related re-operations at a mean of 5.5 years (0.2 to 14.7). The most common reasons for re-operation were arthritis in the lateral compartment (2.5%, 25 knees), bearing dislocation (0.7%, seven knees) and unexplained pain (0.7%, seven knees). When all implant-related re-operations were considered as failures, the ten-year rate of survival was 94% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92 to 96) and the 15-year survival rate 91% (CI 83 to 98). When failure of the implant was the endpoint the 15-year survival was 99% (CI 96 to 100).This is the only large series of minimally invasive UKAs with 15-year survival data. The results support the continued use of minimally invasive UKA for the recommended indications.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:1493–99.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0

10.1016/j.arth.2003.12.082

10.1054/arth.2001.25552

10.2106/JBJS.K.00791

10.1302/0301-620X.70B5.3192563

Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J, Pandit H, Dodd C, Murray DUnicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee.Second ed; Goodfellow Publishers, Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.

10.1302/0301-620X.89B12.19259

10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006

10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25767

10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19424

Insall JN, 1989, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 248, 13, 10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004

Tegner Y, 1985, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 198, 43, 10.1097/00003086-198509000-00007

10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.22105

10.1038/bjc.1977.1

10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.059

10.1302/0301-620X.66B4.6746686

10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21914

10.1097/00003086-200506000-00024

10.1002/1097-4636(2001)58:3<282::AID-JBM1018>3.0.CO;2-S

10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22491

10.1016/j.knee.2004.03.004

10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25605

10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34331

10.2106/JBJS.L.00963

10.2106/00004623-198971010-00023

10.1016/j.joca.2014.07.006

10.1007/s00264-013-1830-8

10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.019

10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.29372

10.1007/s11999-010-1506-2