Armstrong, K. & Bulmer, S. (1998). The governance of the single European market. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Bomberg, E. (1998). Green parties and politics in the European Union. London and New York: Routledge.
Börzel, T. (2000). Why there is no ‘southern problem‘. On environmental leaders and laggards in the European Union', Journal of European Public Polcy 7(1): 141–162.
Brzinski, J.B. (1995). Political group cohesion in the European Parliament, 1989–1994, in C. Rhodes & S. Mazey (eds.), The state of the European Union, Vol. 3: Building a European polity?, Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Bueno de Mesquita, B. & Stokman, F.N. (1994). European community decision making. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Burley, A.-M. & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the court: A political theory of legal integration, International Organization 47: 41–76.
Caporaso, J.A. (1998). Regional integration theory: Understanding our past and anticipating our future, Journal of European Public Policy 5(1): 12–16.
Caporaso, J.A. (1999). Toward a normal science of regional integration, Journal of European Public Policy 6(1): 160–164.
Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K.E. & Wiener, A. (1999). The social construction of Europe, Journal of European Public Policy 6(4): 528–544.
Ciavarini Azzi, G. (2000). The slow march of European legislation: The implementation of directives, in K. Neunreither & A. Wiener (eds.), European integration after Amsterdam. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Cox, R. (1999). Susan Strange: A personal reflection, IEPG news, newsletter of the BISA International Political Economy Group, February, pp. 3–4.
Dehousse, R. (1998). The European Court of Justice. London and New York: Macmillan and St Martin's Press.
Dunn, W.M. (1994). Public policy analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Edwards, G. & Wiesala, G. (1998). Editorial: Flexibility, legitimacy and identity in a post-Amsterdam Europe, in G. Edwards & G. Wiesala (eds.), The European Union 1997: Annual review of activities. Oxford: Blackwell for Journal of Common Market Studies.
European Commission (1997) Agenda 2000 – For a stronger and wider union, COM(97) 517 final, 15 October.
European Parliament (1999). Committee of Independent Experts – First Report on Allegations Concerning Fraud, Mismanagement and Nepotism in the European Commission, Brussels, 15 March.
Galloway, D. (1999). Agenda 2000 – Packaging the deal, in G. Edwards & G. Wiesala (eds.), The European Union: Annual review 1998/1999. Oxford and New York: Blackwell for the Journal of Common Market Studies.
Garrett, G. (1995). The politics of legal integration in the European Union, International Organization 49: 171–181.
Garrett, G. & Tsebelis, G. (1996). An institutionalist critique of intergovernmentalism, International Organization 50(2): 269–299.
Golub, J. (1996b). State power and institutional influence in European integration: Lessons from the packaging waste directive, Journal of Commom Market Studies 34(3): 313–341.
Gomez, R. (1999). TheMediterranean policy of the European Union. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Politics, University of Glasgow.
Grande, E. (1996). The state and interest groups in a framework of multi-level decisionmaking: The case of the European Union, Journal of European Public Policy 3(3): 318–328.
Haas, E. (1964). Beyond the nation-state: Functionalism and international organization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Haas, E. (1968). The uniting of Europe: Political, social, and economic forces, 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Haas, E. (1975). The Obsolescence of Regional Integration Theory. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.
Haas, P. (1992). Epistemic communities and international policy coordination, International Organization 46(1): 1–35.
Harcourt, A.J. & Radaelli, C.M. (1999). Limits to EU technocratic regulation?, European Journal of Political Research 35(1): 107–122.
Helco, H. (1978). Issue networks and the executive establishment, in A. King (ed.), The new American political system. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Hindmoor, A. (1998). The importance of being trusted: Transaction costs and policy network theory, Public Administration 76(1): 25–43.
Hix, S. (1998a). Elections, parties and institutional design: A comparative perspective on European Union democracy, West European Politics 21(3): 19–52.
Hix, S. (1998b). Contribution to ‘Integrating Left and Right: Studying EU politics’, ESCA Review, Fall, pp. 2–3.
Hix, S. (1999). The political system of the European Union. London: Macmillan.
Hoffmann, S. (1982). Reflections on the nation-state in Western Europe today, Journal of Common Market Studies 21(September/December): 21–37.
Hooghe, L. (1998). Contribution to ‘Integrating left and right: Studying EU politics’, ECSA Review, Fall, pp. 4–5.
Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (1997). 'Contending models of governance in the European Union, in A. Cafruny & C. Lankowski (eds.), Europe's ambiguous unity. London and Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Jönsson, C., Bjurulf, B., Elgström, O., Sannerstedt, A. & Strömvik, M. (1998) Negotiations in networks in the European Union, International Negotiation 3(3): 319–344.
Jordan, A. (1999). The implementation of EU environmental polity: A policy problem without a political solution, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 17(1): 69–90.
Krasner, S. (1984). Approaches to the state, Comparative Politics 16(2): 223–246.
Levitt, M. & Lord, C. (2000). The political economy of monetary union. Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press.
Lindberg, L. & Scheingold, S.A. (1970). Europe's would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Lindberg, L. & Scheingold, S.A., eds. (1971). Regional integration: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Marks, G. (1996). Exploring and explaining variation in EU cohesion policy, in L. Hooghe (ed.), Cohesion policy and European integration. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Marks, G., Hooghe, L. & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric versus multi-level governance, Journal of Common Market Studies 34(3): 341–378.
Milner, H. (1998). Rationalizing politics: The emerging synthesis of international, American, and comparative politics, International Organization 52(4): 759–786.
Moravcsik, A. (1993). Introduction: Integrating international and domestic theories of international bargaining', in P.B. Evans, H.K. Jacobson & R.D. Putnam (eds.), Doubleedged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press and ICL Press.
Moravcsik, A. (1999a). The choice for Europe: Current commentary and future research, Journal of European Public Policy 6(1): 168–179.
Moravcsik, A. (1999b). A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation, International Organization 53(2): 267–306.
Moravcsik, A. & Nicolaïdis, K. (1999). Negotiating the Treaty of Amsterdam: Interests, influence, institutions, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(1): 59–85.
Nugent, N. (1999). The government and politics of the European Union, 4th edn. London and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press.
O'Toole, L. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration, Public Administration Review 57(1): 45–52.
Peterson, J. (1995). Decision-making in the European Union: Towards a framework for analysis, Journal of European Public Policy 2(1): 69–93.
Peterson, J. (1998). Introduction: The European Union as a global actor, in J. Peterson & H. Sjursen (eds.), A common foreign policy for Europe? Competing visions of the CFSP. London and New York: Routledge.
Peterson, J. (1999). The Santer era: The European Commission in normative, historical and theoretical perspective, Journal of European Public Policy 6(1): 46–65.
Peterson, J. & Bomberg, E. (1998). Northern enlargement and EU decision-making, in P.-H. Laurent & M. Maresceau (eds.), The state of the European Union, Vol. 4: Deepening and widening. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.
Peterson, J. & Bomberg, E. (1999). Decision-making in the European Union. London and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press.
Pfetsch, F.R. (1998). Negotiating the European Union: A negotiation-network approach, International Negotiation 3(3): 293–317.
Pierson, P. (1998). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis, in W. Sandholtz & A. Stone Sweet (eds.), European integration and supranational governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollack, M. (1997). Delegation, agency and agenda-setting in the European Union, International Organization 51(1): 99–134.
Puchala, D. (1972). Of blind men, elephants and international integration, Journal of Common Market Studies 10(2): 267–284.
Puchala, D. (1999). Institutionalism, intergovernmentalism and European integration: A review article, Journal of Common Market Studies 37(2): 317–331.
Radaelli, C.M. (1999). Technocracy in the European Union. Harlow and New York: Longman.
Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rhodes, R.A.W., Bache, I. & George, S. (1996). Policy networks and policy making in the EU: A critical appraisal, in L. Hooghe (ed.), Cohesion Policy and European integration. Oxford University Press.
Richardson, J. (1996a). Actor based models of national and EU policy-making, in H. Kassim & A. Menon (eds.), The European Union and national industrial policy. London: Routledge.
Richardson, J. (1996b). Eroding EU policies: Implementation gaps, cheating and re-steering, in J. Richardson (ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making. London: Routledge.
Risse, T. & Wiener, A. (1999). ‘Something rotten’ and the social construction of social constructivism: A comment on comments, Journal of European Public Policy 6(5): 775–782.
Sandholtz, W. & Stone Sweet, A., eds. (1998). European integration and supranational governance. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Sbragia, A. (1993). The European Community: A balancing act, Publius 23: 23–38.
Scharpf, F.W. (1999). Selecting cases and testing hypothesis, Journal of European Public Policy 6(1): 164–168.
Shackleton, M. (2000). The politics of co-decision, Journal of Common Market Studies 38(2): 323–343.
Strange, S. (1988). States and markets. London: Pinter.
Strange, S. (1998). Who are EU? Ambiguities in the concept of competitiveness, Journal of Common Market Studies 36(1): 101–114.
Torreblanca, J.I. (1998). Overlapping games and cross-cutting coalitions in the European Union, West European Politics 21(2): 134–153.
Tranholm-Mikkelsen, J. (1991). Neo-functionalism: Obstinate or obsolete? A reappraisal in light of the new dynamism of the EC. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 20: 1–22.
van Buitenen, P. (2000). Blowing the whistle. London: Politico's Publishing.
Wallace, H. (1997). Introduction, in H. Wallace & A. Young (eds.), Participation and policymaking in the European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Wallace, H. (1999). Piecing the integration jigsaw together, Journal of European Public Policy 6(1): 155–159.
Wallace, H. (2000). Analysing and explaining policies, in H. Wallace & W. Wallace (eds.), Policy-making in the European Union, 4th edn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Webber, D. (1999). The Franco-German relationship and Economic andMonetary Union, West European Politics 22(1): 45–67.
Weiler, J.H.H. (1999). The constitution of Europe. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zito, A. (1995). Integrating the environment into the European Union: The history of the controversial Carbon Tax, in C. Rhodes & S. Mazey (eds.), The State of the European Union, Vol. 3: Building a European polity? Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Address for correspondence: John Peterson, Department of Politics, University of Glasgow, Adam Smith Building, Glasgow G12 8RT, Scotland Phone: UK + 141 330 5076; Fax: UK + 141 330 5067: E-mail:
[email protected]