The capability approach and the ‘medium of choice’: steps towards conceptualising information and communication technologies for development
Tóm tắt
Amartya Sen’s capability approach has become increasingly popular in development studies. This paper identifies controllability and operationalisability as two key stumbling blocks which prevent the capability approach from being used even more widely in development practice. It discusses the origins and application of the Choice Framework, a conceptual tool designed to help operationalise the approach. The framework can be used to deconstruct embedded ideologies and analyse the appropriateness of development goals, to map development as a systemic process, and to plan interventions which can result in increased freedom of choice for people. Three examples of the application of the Choice Framework in the field of information and communication for development (ICT4D) are given. The three technologies which are examined, telecentres (Infocentros), Chilecompra and Fair Tracing, can be placed at different places of a determinism continuum, some reducing the spectrum of choices a user has. The paper argues that while frameworks such as the Choice Framework can be developed further to increase the operationalisability of the capability approach, it is up to development funders to accept the fact that people’s choices are never fully predictable and thus Sen’s ‘development as freedom’ will inevitably be a dynamic and open-ended process.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alsop, R., & Heinsohn, N. (2005). Measuring empowerment in practice—Structuring analysis and framing indicators. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Bebbington, A. J. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analysing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021–2044.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.
Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society and culture: The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Chambers, R., & Conway, G. R. (1992). ‘Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century’. Discussion Paper 296. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.
Clark, D. (2002). Visions of development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
DFID. (1999). Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. London: Department for International Development.
Duncombe, R. (2006). Using the livelihoods framework to analyse ict applications for poverty reduction through microenterprise. Information Technologies and International Development, 3(3), 81–100.
Garnham, N. (2000). Amartya Sen’s “Capabilities” approach to the evaluation of welfare and its applications to communications. In B. Cammaerts & J. C. Burgelmans (Eds.), Beyond competition: Broadening the scope of telecommunications policy (pp. 25–36). Brussels: VUB University Press.
Gerster, R., & Zimmermann, S. (2003). Information and communication technologies (ICTs) for poverty reduction? Discussion Paper. Bern: Swiss Agency for Development Cooperation.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gigler, B.-S. (2004). Including the excluded—Can ICTs empower poor communities? Towards an alternative evaluation framework based on the capability approach, Paper presented at Fourth International Conference on the Capability Approach, Pavia, Italy (5–7 September).
Harriss, J. (2001). Depoliticizing development—The World Bank and social capital. London: Anthem Press.
Heeks, R. (1999). Information and communication technologies, poverty and development. Development Informatics Working Paper No. 5. Manchester: IDPM.
Johnstone, J. (2007). Technology as empowerment: A capability approach to computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 73–87.
Kleine, D. (2007). Empowerment and the limits of choice: Microentrepreneurs, information and communication technologies and state policies in Chile, (unpublished PhD thesis). Department of Geography and Environment, London, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Kleine, D. (2008). Negotiating partnerships, understanding power: Doing action research on Chilean Fairtrade wine value chains. The Geographical Journal, 174(2), 95–191.
Kleine, D. (2009). The ideology behind the technology—Chilean microentrepreneurs and public ICT policies. Geoforum, 40, 171–183.
Kleine, D. (2010). ICT4What? Using the Choice Framework to operalitionalise the capability approach to development. Journal of International Development, 22(5), 674–692.
Lessig, L. (2000). Code and other laws of cyberspace. New York: Basic Books.
Light, A., Kleine, D., & Vivent, M. (2009). Performing Charlotte: A tool to bridge cultures in participatory design. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 2(1), 36–58. (forthcoming).
Mansell, R. (2002). From digital divides to digital entitlements in knowledge societies. Current Sociology, 50(3), 407–426.
Mansell, R. (2006). Ambiguous connections: Entitlements and responsibilities of global networking. Journal of International Development, 18(6), 901–913.
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide–Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oosterlaken, I. (2008). Product innovation for human development; A capability approach to designing for the bottom of the pyramid. Working Paper of the 3TU.Centre for Ethics and Technology. Delft: Delft University of Technology.
Robeyns, I. (2003a). Sen’s capabilities approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(2/3), 61–92.
Robeyns, I. (2003b). The capabilities approach: An interdisciplinary introduction. Department of Political Science and Amsterdam School of Social Sciences Research Working Paper, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Sen, A. (1980). Equality of what? In S. McMurrin (Ed.), The Tanner Lectures on human values (Vol. 1, pp. 197–220). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
Sen, A. (1984). Resources, values and development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wajcman, J. (2004). Technofeminism. Oxford: Polity Press.
Zheng, Y. (2007). Exploring the value of the capability approach for e-development’. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Social Implications of Computers in Developing Countries. Sao Paulo, Brazil, (28–30 May).