The audit review process: A characterization from the persuasion perspective
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ajzen, 1980
Alba, 1987, Dimensions of consumer expertise, Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 411, 10.1086/209080
American Accounting Association, 1988, Research opportunities in auditing: the second decade
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 1979, Systems of quality control for a CPA firm, 149, 103
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 1995
Anderson, 1981, Integration theory applied to cognitive responses and attitudes
Ashton, 1991, Experience and error frequency knowledge as potential determinants of audit expertise, The Accounting Review, 66, 218
Ashton, 1988, Audit decision making, 95
Bamber, 1983, Expert judgment in the audit team: a source reliability approach, Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 396, 10.2307/2490781
Bamber, 1982, The audit team and the audit review process: an organizational approach, Journal of Accounting Literature, 1, 33
Bamber, 1987, The effects of the planning memorandum, time pressure and individual auditor characteristics on audit managers' review time judgments, Contemporary Accounting Research, 4, 127, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1987.tb00659.x
Bamber, 1988, A descriptive study of audit managers' working paper review, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 7, 137
Biggs, 1988, Auditor's use of analytical review in audit program design, The Accounting Review, 63, 148
Bonner, 1990, Experience effects in auditing: the role of task-specific knowledge, The Accounting Review, 65, 72
Bonner, 1994, The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge, The Accounting Review, 69, 157
Bonner, 1996, Using decision aids to improve auditors' conditional probability judgments, The Accounting Review, 71, 221
Boritz, 1985, The effect of information presentation structures on audit planning and review judgments, Contemporary Accounting Research, 1, 193, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1985.tb00376.x
Brumfield, 1983, Business risk and the audit process, Journal of Accountancy, 155, 60
Butt, 1988, Frequency judgments in an auditing-related task, Journal of Accounting Research, 26, 315, 10.2307/2491106
Cacioppo, 1983, Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall and persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805, 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805
Cacioppo, 1979, Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall and persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97
Cacioppo, 1980, Persuasiveness of communications is a affected by exposure frequency and message quality: a theoretical and empirical analysis of persisting attitude change
Chaiken, 1980, Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752, 10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
Chaiken, 1987, The heuristic model of persuasion, volume 5
Choo, 1991, The relationship between knowledge structure and judgments for experienced and inexperienced auditors, The Accounting Review, 66, 464
Cushing, 1986, Comparison of audit methodologies of large accounting firms, 26
Eagly, 1984, Cognitive theories of persuasion, Vol. 17
Einhorn, 1977, Quality of group judgment, Psychological Bulletin, 84, 158, 10.1037/0033-2909.84.1.158
Emby, 1988, Good judgments in public accounting: quality and justification, Contemporary Accounting Research, 4, 287, 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1987.tb00668.x
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 1975
Fishbein, 1980, A theory of reasoned action: some applications and implications
Frederick, 1994, The structure of auditors' knowledge of financial statement errors, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13, 1
Friestad, 1994, The persuasion knowledge model: how people cope with persuasion attempts, Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1, 10.1086/209380
Gibbins, 1984, Propositions about the psychology of professional judgment in public accounting, Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 103, 10.2307/2490703
Gibbins, 1985, Evidence on the nature of professional judgment in public accounting
Greenwald, 1968, Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change
Hackenbrack, 1996, Auditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards, The Accounting Review, 71, 43
Ismail, 1995, The impact of the review process in hypothesis generation tasks, Accounting, Organization and Society, 20, 345, 10.1016/0361-3682(95)00002-Q
Johnson, 1992, Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgment, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10, 96
Johnson-Laird, 1982, Thinking as a skill, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 34, 1, 10.1080/14640748208400855
Johnson-Laird, 1983
Kennedy, 1993, Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: a framework and experimental results, Journal of Accounting Research, 31, 231, 10.2307/2491272
Kennedy, 1995, Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment, The Accounting Review, 70, 249
Kida, 1984, The impact of hypothesis testing strategies on auditors' use of judgment data, Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 332, 10.2307/2490714
Knapp, 1993
Koonce, 1995, Justification of decisions in auditing, Journal of Accounting Research, 33, 369, 10.2307/2491493
Libby, 1985, Availability and the generation of hypotheses in analytical review, Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 646, 10.2307/2490831
Libby, 1995, The role of knowledge and memory in audit judgment
Libby, 1990, Experience and the ability to explain audit findings, Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 348, 10.2307/2491154
Libby, 1993, Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: ability. Knowledge, motivation, environment, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 425, 10.1016/0361-3682(93)90040-D
Libby, 1993, The review process as a control for differential recall of evidence in auditor judgments, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 559, 10.1016/0361-3682(93)90003-O
Libby, 1987, Member variation, recognition of expertise, and group performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 81, 10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.81
McGuire, 1964, Inducing resistance to persuasion: some contemporary approaches, Vol. 1
Mautz, 1961
Messier, 1994, Recency effects in belief revision: the impact of audit experience and the review process, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 13, 57
Milliron, 1981, The Audit review process — a survey of big eight CPA firm partners
Miner, 1984, Group versus individual decision making: an investigation of performance measures, decision strategies and process losses/gains, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 112, 10.1016/0030-5073(84)90014-X
Nelson, 1993, The effects of error frequency and accounting knowledge on error diagnosis in analytical review, The Accounting Review, 68, 803
Nelson, 1994, The learning and application of frequency knowledge in audit judgment, Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 185
Nelson, 1995, Knowledge structure and the estimation of conditional probabilities in audit planning, The Accounting Review, 70, 27
Peat, 1976
Peecher, 1996, The influence of auditors' justification process on their decisions: a cognitive model and experimental evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 125, 10.2307/2491335
Petty, 1986
Petty, 1983, Group size effects on cognitive effort and attitude change, Vol. 1, 165
Petty, 1981, Historical foundation of the cognitive response approach to attitudes and persuasion
Petty, 1976, Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: thought disruption versus effort justification, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874, 10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.874
Ramsay, 1994, Senior/manager differences in audit workpaper review performance, Journal of Accounting Research, 32, 127, 10.2307/2491391
Rhode, 1977, Survey on the Influence of selected aspects of the auditors' work environment on professional performance of certified public accountants
Ricchiute, 1992, Working paper order effects and auditors' going concern decisions, The Accounting Review, 67, 46
Roebuck, 1992, A field study of the review process: research note, Abacus, 28, 200, 10.1111/j.1467-6281.1992.tb00280.x
Schlenker, 1980
Sherman, 1987, Cognitive processes in the formation, change and expression of attitudes, volume 5
Solomon, 1987, Multi-auditor judgment decision making research, Journal of Accounting Literature, 6, 1
Tan, 1995, Effects of expectation and prior involvement and review awareness on memory for audit evidence and judgment, Journal of Accounting Research, 33, 113, 10.2307/2491295
Tetlock, 1989, Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability, conformity, complexity, and bolstering, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 632, 10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.632
Trotman, 1985, The review process and the accuracy of auditor judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 740, 10.2307/2490836
Trotman, 1985, The effect of the review process on auditor judgments, Journal of Accounting Research, 23, 256, 10.2307/2490918
Trotman, 1983, Internal and group judgments of internal control systems, Journal of Accounting Research, 21, 286, 10.2307/2490948
Tubbs, 1992, The effect of experience on the auditor's organization and the amount of knowledge, The Accounting Review, 67, 452
Watson, 1975, The structure of project teams facing differential environments: an exploratory study in public accounting firms, The Accounting Review, 50, 259
Yetton, 1982, Individual versus group problem solving: an empirical test of a best member strategy, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 29, 307, 10.1016/0030-5073(82)90248-3