The assessment of quality in higher education: A critical review of the literature and research

Abbott, Walter F. (1972). University and departmental determinants of the prestige of sociology departments.American Sociologist 7 (November): 14–15. Abbott, Walter F., and Henry M. Barlow (1972). Stratification theory and organizational rank: resources, functions and university prestige in the United States.Pacific Sociological Review 15 (October): 401–424. Astin, Alexander W. (1962). Productivity of undergraduate institutions.Science 136: 129–135. —— (1985).Achieving Educational Excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Astin, Alexander W., and James W. Henson (1977). New measures of college selectivity.Research in Higher Education 6: 1–8. Astin, Alexander W., and Lewis C. Solmon (1979). Measuring academic quality: an interim report.Change 11: 48–51. —— (1981). Are reputational ratings needed to measure quality?Change 13 (October): 14–19. Axelson, Leland J. (1960). Graduate schools and the productivity of their graduates.American Journal of Sociology 66 (September): 171–175. Blackburn, Robert T., and Paul E. Lingenfelter (1973).Assessing Quality in Doctoral Programs: Criteria and Correlates of Excellence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1973. Blau, Peter M., and Rebecca Z. Margulies (1974). The reputations of American professional schools.Change 6 (Winter): 42–47. Bowker, Albert H. (1965). Quality and quantity in higher education.Journal of the American Statistical Association 60 (March): 1–15. Brown, David G. (1967).The Mobile Professors. Washington, D.C.: The American Council on Education. Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education (1976).A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Berkeley, Calif.: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Carpenter, Ray L., and Patricia A. Carpenter (1970). The doctorate in librarianship and an assessment of graduate library education.Journal of Education for Librarianship 11: 3–45. Cartter, Allan M. (1966).An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: The American Council on Education. Cartter, Allan M., and Lewis C. Solmon (1977). The Cartter report on the leading schools of education, law, and business.Change 9: 44–48. Clark, Mary J., Rodney T. Harnett, and Leonard L. Baird (1976).Assessing Dimensions of Quality in Doctoral Education: A Technical Report of a National Study in Three Fields. Princeton: The Educational Testing Service, 1976. Clemente, Frank, and Richard Sturgis (1974). Quality of department of doctoral training on research productivity.Sociology of Education 47: 287–299. Cole, Jonathan R. and James A. Lipton (1977). The reputation of American medical schools.Social Forces 55: 662–684. Conrad, Clifton F. and Robert T. Blackburn (1985a). Program quality in higher education: a review and critique of literature and research. InHigher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. I, pp. 283–308. New York: Agathon Press. —— (1985b). Correlates of departmental quality in regional colleges and universities.American Educational Research Journal 22 (Summer): 279–295. -- (1986). Current views of departmental quality: an empirical examination.Review of Higher Education, 9 (Spring), forthcoming. Cox, W. Miles, and Viola Catt (1977). Productivity ratings of graduate programs in psychology based on publication in the journals of the American Psychological Association.American Psychologist 32: 793–813. Crane, Diana (1970). Scientists at major and minor universities: a study of productivity and recognition.American Sociological Review 30 (October): 699–714. Dolan, W. Patrick (1976).The Ranking Game: The Power of the Academic Elite. Lincoln, Neb.: The University of Nebraska Printing and Duplicating Service. Drew, David E. (1975).Science Development: An Evaluation Study. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy of Sciences. Drew, David E., and Ronald S. Karpf (1981). Ranking academic departments: empirical findings and a theoretical perspective.Research in Higher Education 14: 305–320. Dubé, W. F. (1974). Undergraduate origins of U.S. medical students.Journal of Medical Education 49: 1005–1010. Elton, Charles F., and Samuel A. Rodgers (1971). Physics department ratings: another evaluation.Science 174 (November): 565–568. Elton, Charles F., and Harriett A. Rose (1972). What are the ratings rating?American Psychologist 27: 197–201. Gallant, Jonathan, and John W. Prothero (1972). Weight-watching at the university: the consequences.Science 175 (no. 381): 385–386. Gill, W. N. (1975).Rankings of Graduate Engineering Departments. Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo. Glenn, Novales D., and Wayne Villimez (1970). The productivity of sociologists at 45 American universities.American Sociologist 5 (August): 244–252. Glower, Donald D. (1980). A rational method for ranking engineering programs.Engineering Education 70: 788–794; 842. Gourman, Jack (1967).The Gourman Report: Ratings of American Colleges. Phoenix, Arizona: The Continuing Research Institute. —— (1977a).The Gourman Report: A Rating of Undergraduate Programs in American and International Universities. Los Angeles: The National Education Standards. —— (1977b).The Gourman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities. Los Angeles: The National Education Standards. —— (1982).The Gourman Report: A Rating of Undergraduate Programs in American and International Universities. Los Angeles: The National Education Standards. —— (1983).The Gourman Report: A Rating of Graduate and Professional Programs in American and International Universities, rev. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: The National Education Standards. Gregg, Russell T., and Paul D. Sims (1972). Quality of faculties and programs of graduate departments of educational administration.Educational Administration Quarterly 8: 67–92. Guba, Egon G., and David L. Clark (1978). Levels of R & D productivity in schools of education.Educational Researchers 7: 3–9. Hagstrom, Warren O. (1971). Inputs, outputs, and the prestige of university science departments.Sociology of Education 44 (Fall): 375–397. House, Donald R., and James H. Yeager, Jr. (1978). The distribution of publication success within and among top economics departments: a disaggregate view of recent evidence.Economic Inquiry 16 (October): 593–598. Hughes, Raymond M. (1925).A Study of Graduate Schools of America. Oxford, Ohio: The Miami University Press, 1925. —— (1934). Report of the Committee on Graduate Instruction.Educational Record 15 (1934): 192–234. Jones, R. W. (1969). The student faculty ratio in graduate programs of selected departments of sociology.American Sociologist 4: 123–127. Johnson, Richard R. Leadership among American colleges.Change 10 (November): 50–51. Jones, Lyle V., Gardner Lindzey, and Porter E. Coggeshall, eds. (1982a).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Humanities. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. —— (1982b).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Social and Behavioral Sciences. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. —— (1982c).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Biological Sciences. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. —— (1982d).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Mathematical and Physical Sciences. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. —— (1982c).An Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States: Engineering. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. Jordan, Robert T. (1963). Library characteristics of colleges ranking high in academic excellence.College and Research Libraries 24: 369–376. Juris Doctor Magazine (1976). The popular vote: rankings of top schools. Vol. 6: 17–18, 21. Kelso, Charles D. (1975). How does your law school measure up?Student Lawyer 4: 20–24. Keniston, Hayward (1959).Graduate Study in Research in the Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press. Knapp, R. H., and J. J. Greenbaum (1953).The Younger American Scholar: His Collegiate Origins. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Knapp, R. H. and H. B. Goodrich (1952).Origins of American Scientists. New York: Russell and Russell. Knudsen, Dean D., and Ted R. Vaughan (1969). Quality in graduate education: a reevaluation of the rankings of sociology departments in the Cartter report.American Sociologist 4 (February): 12–19. Krause, Ervin D. and Loretta Krause (1970). The colleges that produce our best scientists: a study of the academic training grounds of a large group of distinguished American scientists.Science Education 54: 133–140. Kuh, George D. (1981).Indices of Quality in the Undergraduate Experience. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 4. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education. Lavender, A. D., R. A. Mathers, and J. Pease (1971). The student-faculty ratio in graduate programs of selected departments of sociology: a supplement to the Janes report.American Sociologist 6: 29–30. Lawrence, Judith K., and Kenneth C. Green (1980).A Question of Quality: The Higher Education Ratings Game. AAHE-ERIC/Higher Education Research Report No. 5. Washington, D.C.: American Association for Higher Education. Lewis, Lionel S. (1968). On subjective and objective rankings of sociology departments.American Sociologist 3 (May): 129–131. Liu, Helen C. (1978). Faculty citation and quality of graduate engineering departments.Engineering Education 68 (April): 739–741. Magoun, H. W. (1966). The Cartter report on quality in graduate education.Journal of Higher Education 37 (December): 481–492. Margulies, Rebecca Z., and Peter M. Blau (1973). America's leading professional schools.Change, (November): 21–27. MBA Magazine (1974). The 15 top-ranked business schools in the United States. December, 21–25. -- (1975). The top 15: The MBA survey of graduate business schools. December, 33–35. Morgan, David L., Richard C. Kearney, and James L. Regens (1976). Assessing quality among graduate institutions of higher education in the United States.Social Science Quarterly 57 (December): 670–679. Munson, C. Eric, and Pat Nelson (1977). Measuring the quality of professional schools.UCLA Educator 19: 41–52. National Science Board (1969).Graduate Education: Parameters for Public Policy. Washington, D.C.: The National Science Foundation. Oromaner, Mark J. (1970). A note on analytical properties and prestige of sociology departments.American Sociologist 5 (August): 240–244. Perkins, Dexter, and John L. Snell (1962).The Education of Historians in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill. Petrowski, William R., Evan L. Brown, and John A. Duffy (1973). National universities and the ACE ratings.Journal of Higher Education 44 (October): 495–513. Pirsig, Robert M. (1974).Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. New York: Morrow. Roose, Kenneth D., and Charles J. Andersen (1970).A Rating of Graduate Programs. Washington, D.C.: The American Council on Education. Scully, Malcolm G. The well-known universities lead in rating of faculties' reputations.Chronicle of Higher Education, Jan. 15, 1979, pp. 6–7. Shichor, David. “Prestige of Sociology Departments and the Placing of New Ph.D.'s”American Sociologist 5 (May 1970): 157–160. Smith, Richard, and Fred E. Fiedler (1971). The measurement of scholarly work: a critical review of the literature.Educational Record 52 (Summer): 225–232. Solmon, Lewis, and Alexander W. Astin (1981). Departments without distinguished graduate programs.Change 13 (October): 23–28. Somit, Alfred, and Joseph Tanenhaus (1964).American Political Science: A Profile of a Discipline. New York: Atherton Press. Tidball, M. Elizabeth, and V. Kristiakowski (1976). Perspective on academic women and affirmative action.Educational Record 54: 130–135. Webster, David S. (1981). Methods of assessing quality.Change 13 (October): 20–24. -- (1983). America's highest ranked graduate schools, 1925–1982.Change (May/June): 14–24. -- (1984). Who is Jack Gourman and why is he saying all these things about my college?Change (Nov./Dec.): 14–19. Wispe, Lauren G. (1969). The bigger the better: productivity, size, and turnover in a sample of psychology departments.American Psychologist 24: 662–668.