The antinomies of sovereigntism, statism and liberalism in European democratic responses to the COVID-19 crisis: a comparison of Britain and France
Tóm tắt
This paper argues that the current COVID-19 pandemic reveals and in a sense crystallizes a series of long-standing tensions about sovereignty that have become increasingly salient in the advanced capitalist democracies of the European Union. The spread of the pandemic led first to the activation of a conflict between a ‘sovereigntist reflex’ privileging the expression of national capacities and national self-reliance and a more ‘perforated’ understanding of sovereignty stressing the interdependence of peoples and states, both geographically and institutionally. As the response to COVID itself became more politicized we see the emergence of a second tension, between a libertarian ‘reflex’ supporting a residual state protecting liberties and facilitating individual choice and a sovereign-statist ‘instinct’, calling for an empowered guardian of the public good capable of ensuring collective security. A third tension relates to the seemingly growing opposition between a conception of sovereignty founded (and contingent) upon the will of the people and one in which the sovereign is, simultaneously, the discerner, defender and ultimate guarantor of the public good. After having mapped out these interwoven tensions and their main fault lines in general terms, the paper proceeds comparatively, tracking and tracing their (differential and specific) presence in governmental responses in two advanced capitalist democracies, France and Britain.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anderson, M., M. Mckee, and E. Mossialos. 2020. Covid-19 exposes weaknesses in European response to outbreaks. British Medical Journal 368: m1075.
Becher, M., Stegmueller, D., Brouard, S. et al. 2020. Comparative experimental evidence on compliance with social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic. Citizens’ Attitudes Under the Covid-19 Pandemic Working Paper.
Béland, D., B. Cantillon, R. Hick, and A. Moreira. 2021. Social Policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the Covid-19 crisis. Social Policy & Administration 55 (2): 249–260.
Benoît, C. 2020. Réguler l’accès aux medicaments. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
Benziman, Y. 2020. “Winning” the “Battle” and “Beating” the Covid-19 “Enemy”: Leaders’ use of war frames to define the pandemic. Peace and Conflict-Journal of Peace Psychology 26 (3): 247–256.
Betz, H-G. 2020b. Will France’s Marine Le Pen be a profiteer or victim of the pandemic?. In: T. Bar-On, and B. Molas eds. Radical right-wing responses to COVID-19. Stuttgart: Ibidem.
Brack, N., R. Coman, and A. Crespy. 2019. Unpacking old and new conflicts of sovereignty in the European polity. Journal of European Integration 41 (7): 817–832.
Capano, G., M. Howlett, D. Jarvis, et al. 2020. Mobilizing policy (In)capacity to fight COVID-19: Understanding variations in state responses. Policy and Society 39 (3): 285–308.
Cole, A. 2020. Emmanuel Macron and the two years that changed France. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Desson, Z., E. Weller, P. McMeekin, et al. 2020. An analysis of the policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in France, Belgium, and Canada. Health Policy and Technology 9 (4): 430–446.
Dinan, D., Nugent, N. and Paterson, W., eds. 2017. The European Union in crisis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Duchacek, I.D. 1987. Toward a typology of new subnational governmental actors in international relations. University of California Berkeley Working Paper. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/62s9g8km.
Ferhani, A., and S. Rushton. 2020. The international health regulations, COVID-19, and bordering practices: Who gets in, what gets out, and who gets rescued? Contemporary Security Policy 41 (3): 458–477.
Gonsalves, G., and G. Yamey. 2020. Political interference in public health during Covid-19. British Medical Journal 371: m3878.
Greer, S., and A. de Ruijter. 2020. EU health law and policy in and after the COVID-19 crisis. European Journal of Public Health 30 (4): 623–624.
Hale, T., N. Angrist, B. Kira, et al. 2021. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature Human Behaviour 5: 529–538.
Hay, C. 1999. Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: Interrogating the process of change. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 1 (3): 317–344.
Hay, C. 2020. Brexistential angst and the paradoxes of populism: On the contingency, predictability and intelligibility of seismic shifts. Political Studies 68 (1): 187–206.
Hay, C. and Benoit, C. 2018. Postnéolibéralisme. In C. Hay, and A. Smith, eds. Dictionnaire d’économie politique. Presses de Sciences Po.
Hay, C. (2013) The Failure of Angloliberal capitalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Heald, D., and R. Hodges. 2020. The accounting, budgeting and fiscal impact of COVID-19 on the United Kingdom. Journal of Public Budget Accounting & Financial Management 32 (5): 785–795.
Hunter, D. 2020. Covid-19 and the stiff upper lip—the pandemic response in the United Kingdom. New England Journal of Medicine 382 (16): e31.
Jabko, N., and M. Luhman. 2019. Reconfiguring sovereignty: Crisis, politicization, and European integration. Journal of European Public Policy 26 (7): 1037–1055.
Jones, D. 2020. History in a crisis—Lessons for Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine 382 (18): 1681–1683.
Lavazza, A., and M. Farina. 2020. The role of experts in the Covid-19 pandemic and the limits of their epistemic authority in democracy. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 356.
Mahase, E. 2020. Covid-19: UK starts social distancing after new model points to 260 000 potential deaths. British Medical Journal 368: m1089.
Middleton, J., H. Lopes, K. Michelson, et al. 2020. Planning for a second wave pandemic of Covid-19 and planning for winter. International Journal of Public Health 65 (9): 1525–1527.
Ortega, F., and M. Orsini. 2020. Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: Ignorance, neoliberal authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership. Global Public Health 15 (9): 1257–1277.
Pollock, A., P. Roderick, and B. Pankhania. 2020. Covid-19: Why is the UK government ignoring WHO’s advice? British Medical Journal 368: m1284.
Scally, G., B. Jacobson, and K. Abbasi. 2020. The UK’s public health response to Covid-19. British Medical Journal 369: m1932.
Sibony, A.-L. 2020. The UK Covid-19 response: A behavioural irony? European Journal of Risk Regulation 11: 350–357.
Wise, J. 2020. Experts divide into two camps of action—shielding versus blanket policies. British Medical Journal 370: m3702.
Wolff, S., and S. Ladi. 2020. European Union responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: Adaptability in times of permanent emergency. Journal of European Integration 42 (8): 1025–1040.
Yan, B., X. Zhang, L. Wu, et al. 2020. Why do countries respond differently to COVID-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan. American Review of Public Administration 50 (6–7): 762–769.