The (alleged) environmental and social benefits of dynamic pricing

Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization - Tập 205 - Trang 574-593 - 2023
Matthew Harding1, Kyle Kettler1, Carlos Lamarche2, Lala Ma2
1Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, Social Science Plaza B, Irvine, CA 92697, United States
2Department of Economics, University of Kentucky, Gatton College of Business and Economics, Lexington, KY 40506-0034, United States

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allcott, 2011, Rethinking real-time electricity pricing, Resour. Energy Econ., 33, 820, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2011.06.003 Andersen, L. M., Hansen, L. G., Jensen, C. L., & Wolak, F. A. (2017). Using real-time pricing and information provision to shift intra-day electricity consumption: evidence from Denmark. Department of Economics, Stanford University. Banzhaf, 2019, Environmental justice: the economics of race, place, and pollution, J. Econ. Perspect., 33, 185, 10.1257/jep.33.1.185 Bollinger, 2020, Information vs. automation and implications for dynamic pricing, Manag. Sci., 66, 290, 10.1287/mnsc.2018.3225 Borenstein, 2022, Do two electricity pricing wrongs make a right? Cost recovery, externalities, and efficiency, Am. Econ. J., 14, 80 Burkhardt, 2019, Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Information and Pricing on Residential Electricity Consumption Burtraw, 1999, Environmental effects of SO2 trading and banking, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 3489, 10.1021/es9902726 Burtraw, 2009, The incidence of US climate policy: alternative uses of revenues from a cap-and-trade auction, Natl. Tax J., 62, 497, 10.17310/ntj.2009.3.09 Bushnell, 2021, Setting with the sun: the impacts of renewable energy on conventional generation, J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ., 8, 759 Callaway, 2018, Environmental location, location, location: the variable value of renewable energy and demand-side efficiency resources, J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ., 5, 39 Chan, 2018, The impact of trading on the costs and benefits of the acid rain program, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 88, 180, 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.11.004 Clay, 2019, The external costs of shipping petroleum products by pipeline and rail: evidence of shipments of crude oil from North Dakota, Energy J., 40, 73, 10.5547/01956574.40.1.kcla Cullen, 2013, Measuring the environmental benefits of wind-generated electricity, Am. Econ. J., 5, 107 Cullen, 2017, Inferring carbon abatement costs in electricity markets: a revealed preference approach using the shale revolution, Am. Econ. J., 9, 106 Deschenes, 2017, Defensive investments and the demand for air quality: evidence from the NOx budget program, Am. Econ. Rev., 107, 2958, 10.1257/aer.20131002 EPA, Environmental Protection Agency U.S. (2011). Clean air markets - emissions monitoring. https://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/clean-air-markets-emissions-monitoring. Faruqui, 2013, Dynamic pricing of electricity for residential customers: the evidence from Michigan, Energy Effic., 6, 571, 10.1007/s12053-013-9192-z Fell, 2018, The fall of coal: joint impacts of fuel prices and renewables on generation and emissions, Am. Econ. J., 10, 90 FERC, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (2011). Form no. 714 - annual electric balancing authority area and planning area report. https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/forms/form-714/data.asp. Fowlie, 2012, What do emissions markets deliver and to whom? Evidence from southern California’s NOx trading program, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 965, 10.1257/aer.102.2.965 Fowlie, 2021, Default effects and follow-on behaviour: evidence from an electricity pricing program, Rev. Econ. Stud., 88, 2886, 10.1093/restud/rdab018 Gillingham, 2018, The cost of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, J. Econ. Perspect., 32, 53, 10.1257/jep.32.4.53 Graff-Zivin, 2014, Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 107, 248, 10.1016/j.jebo.2014.03.010 Grainger, 2010, Who pays a price on carbon?, Environ. Resour. Econ., 46, 359, 10.1007/s10640-010-9345-x Hagemann, 2017, Cluster-robust bootstrap inference in quantile regression models, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 112, 446, 10.1080/01621459.2016.1148610 Harding, 2016, Empowering consumers through data and smart technology: experimental evidence on the consequences of time-of-use electricity pricing policies, J. Policy Anal. Manag., 35, 906, 10.1002/pam.21928 Harding, 2017, Household response to time-varying electricity prices, Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 9, 337, 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053437 Hassett, 2009, The incidence of a US carbon tax: a lifetime and regional analysis, Energy J., 30, 155, 10.5547/ISSN0195-6574-EJ-Vol30-No2-8 Holladay, 2017, The impact of cheap natural gas on marginal emissions from electricity generation and implications for energy policy, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 85, 205, 10.1016/j.jeem.2017.06.004 Holland, 2008, Is real-time pricing green? The environmental impacts of electricity demand variance, Rev. Econ. Stat., 90, 550, 10.1162/rest.90.3.550 Holland, 2016, Are there environmental benefits from driving electric vehicles? The importance of local factors, Am. Econ. Rev., 106, 3700, 10.1257/aer.20150897 Holland, 2019, Distributional effects of air pollution from electric vehicle adoption, J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ., 6, S65 Holland, 2020, Decompositions and policy consequences of an extraordinary decline in air pollution from electricity generation, Am. Econ. J., 12, 244 Ito, 2018, Moral suasion and economic incentives: field experimental evidence from energy demand, Am. Econ. J., 10, 240 Jessoe, 2014, Knowledge is (less) power: experimental evidence from residential energy use, Am. Econ. Rev., 104, 1417, 10.1257/aer.104.4.1417 Joskow, 2012, Dynamic pricing of electricity, Am. Econ. Rev., 102, 381, 10.1257/aer.102.3.381 Knittel, 2015, Natural Gas Prices and Coal Displacement: Evidence from Electricity Markets Koenker, 2005 Koenker, 2017, Quantile regression: 40 years on, Annu. Rev. Econ., 9, 155, 10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103651 Linn, 2018, The heterogeneous impacts of low natural gas prices on consumers and the environment, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 89, 1, 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.02.002 Metcalf, 1999, A distributional analysis of green tax reforms, Natl. Tax J., 52, 655, 10.1086/NTJ41789423 Ramanathan, 1997, Short-run forecasts of electricity loads and peaks, Int. J. Forecast., 13, 161, 10.1016/S0169-2070(97)00015-0 Robinson, 1985, Who pays for industrial pollution abatement?, Rev. Econ. Stat., 67, 702, 10.2307/1924819 Roth, S. (2019). Socal edison’s new rates will vary with the time of day. Some customers may not benefit much - or at all. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-time-use-electricity-rates-20190103-story.htmlhttps://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-time-use-electricity-rates-20190103-story.html. Thill, D. (2019). Illinois groups split on how to balance risk, reward for comed time-of-use rates. The Energy News Network. Retreived from https://www.energynews.us/2019/06/26/midwest/illinois-groups-split-on-how-to-balance-risk-reward-for-comed-time-of-use-rateshttps://www.energynews.us/2019/06/26/midwest/illinois-groups-split-on-how-to-balance-risk-reward-for-comed-time-of-use-rates. Wolak, F. A. (2010). An experimental comparison of critical peak and hourly pricing: the powercentsDC program. Department of Economics Stanford University.