The aesthetic dimension of scientific discovery: finding the inter-maxillary bone in humans

Amrine, F., Zucke, F. J., & Wheeler, H. (Eds.). (1987). Goethe and the sciences: A reapraisal. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Andersen, H. (2009). Unexpected discoveries, graded structures, acceptance and neglect. In J. Meheus & T. Nickles (Eds.), Models of discovery and creativity. Dordrecht: Springer. Ashley-Montagu, M. (1935). The premaxilla in the primates. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 10, 181–208. Barnouw, J. (1987). Goethe and helmholtz: Science and sensation. In F. Amrine, et al. (Eds.), Goethe and the sciences: A reapraisal. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Barteczko, K., & Jakob, M. (2004). A re-evaluation of the premaxillary bone in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 207, 417–437. Campbell, J. K., O'Rourke, M., & Slater, M. H. (2011). Carving nature at its joints: Natural kinds in metaphysics and science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Camper, P., (1779). Account of the organs of speech of the orang outang. By Peter Camper, M. D. Late Professor of Anatomy, &c. in the University of Groningen, and F. R. S. in a Letter to Sir John Pringle, F. R. S Camper, P Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (1776–1886). 1779-01-01. 69:139–159. Camper, P. (1791). Dissertation physique… sur les différences réelles que présentent les traits du visage chez les hommes de différents pays et de différents âges. Utrecht: B. Wild et J. Altheer. Camper, P., (1792). Dissertation sur les variétés naturelles qui caractérisent la physionomie des hommes des divers climats et des différens ages: Suivie de réflexions sur la beauté, particulièrement sur celle de la tête : avec une manière nouvelle de dessiner toute sorte de têtes avec la plus grande exactitude. A Paris: Chez Francart, libraire. Camper, P., & Camper, A. G. (1803). Oeuvres de Pierre Camper, qui ont pour objet l’histoire naturelle, la physiologie et l’anatomie comparée (Vol. 1-3). Paris: Jansen. Camper, P., & Camper, A. G., & Schaz, G. (1793). Peter Campers Vorlesungen, gehalten in der Amsterdammer Zeichen-Akademie, über den Ausdruck der verschiedenen Leidenschaften durch die Gesichtszüge: Über die Bewundernswürdge Ähnlichkeit im bau des Menschen, der vierfüssigen Thiere, der Vögel un Fischè, und über die schonheit der Formen. Berlin: In der Vossischen Buchandlung. Camper, P., Camper, A. G., Quatremère-Disjonval, Vinkeles, R. & B. Wild en J. Altheer (Firm). (1792). Discours prononçés par feû Mr. Pierre Camper, en l’Acadêmie de dessein d’Amsterdam. A Utrecht: Chez B. Wild et J. Altheer. Camper, P., Cogan, T., St. Thomas’s Hospital., & King’s College London. (1821). The works of the late Professor Camper: On the connexion between the science of anatomy and the arts of drawing, painting, statuary &c. &c.; containing a treatise on the natural difference of features in persons of different countries and periods of life, and on beauty, as exhibited in ancient sculpture; with a new method of sketching heads, national features, and portraits of individuals, with accuracy, &c. &c. (Medical Heritage Library.) London: Sold by J. Hearne,…; Priestley and Weale,…; E. Butler,..; W. Mason. Cassirer, E. (1950). The problem of knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press. Di Gregorio, M. (2008). Zoology. In P. Bowler & J. Pickstone (Eds.), The Cambridge history of science (Vol. 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Dupré, J. (1993). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Foucault, M., (1966). Les mots et les choses, Paris: Gallimard. Translated as The Order of Things, Alan Sheridan (trans.), New York: Vintage, 1973. Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Vintage Books. Frank, P. (1957). Philosophy of science: The link between science and philosophy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-HalI. Gambarotto, A. (2018). Vital Forces, Teleology and Organization. Cham: Springer. Ghiselin, B. (1974). Creativity in the arts and sciences: The basic parallels. The Michigan Quarterly Review, 13, 93–98. Ghiselin, M. T. (1976). Poetic biology: A defense and manifesto. New Literary History, 7, 493–504. Goethe, J. W., (1948–1963). Gedankausgabe der Werke, Briefe und Gespräche, ed. E. Bueutler. Zürich: ArtemisVerlag. Goethe, J. W. (2009). The metamorphosis of plants. United Kingdom: MIT Press. Goethe, J. W. (2016). The Essential Goethe, ed. by M. Bell, Princeton University Press. Goethe, J. W. (1952) Goethe’s Botanical Writings (ed. and trans. Bertha Mueller), Univ. of Hawaii Press, Honolulu. Goethe, J. W., & Eastlake, C. L. (1970). Theory of colors. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press. Goethe, J. W., & Miller, D. (1988). Scientific studies. New York: Suhrkamp. Goodman, N. (2013). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett. Gould, S. J., (1987/1992). Petrus Camper’s angle. Natural History 96 (7): 12–18. Grindle, N. (1997). Our own imperfect knowledge: Petrus Camper and the search for an ‘ideal form’. Anthropology and Aesthetics, 31, 139–148. Guilbert, S. F., & Faber, M. (1997). Looking at embryos: The visual and conceptual aesthetics of emerging form. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 125–151). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hanson, N. R., & Humphreys, W. C. (1969). Perception and discovery: An introduction to scientific inquiry. San Francisco: Freeman, Cooper & Company. Helmholtz, H. von (1971). Philosophische Vorträge und Aufsätze (ed. by H. Harz and S.Wollgast). Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Henel, H. (1956). Type and proto-phenomenon in Goethe’s science. PMLA, 71, 651–658. Hobson, M. (2004). Measuring statues, or, special neutrality. Paragraph, 27, 33–49. Kantorovich, A. (1993). Scientific discovery: Logic and tinkering., Suny Series in Philosophy and Biology Albany: State University of New York Press. Kuhn, T., (1962/1970), The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. (1977). The essential tension. Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lenoir, T. (1987). The eternal laws of form: Morphotypes and the conditions of existence in Goethe’s biological thought. In F. Amrine, F. J. Zucker, & H. Wheeler (Eds.), In Goethe and the sciences (pp. 17–28). Dordrecht: D.Reidel. Lloyd, D. (2019). Under representation: The racial regime of aesthetics. New York: Fordham University Press. Lovejoy, A. O. (1936). The Great Chain of Being. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Magnani, L. (2000). Abduction, reason, and science: Processes of discovery and explanation. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Magnani, L. (2009). Creative abduction and hypothesis withdrawal. In J. Meheus & T. Nickles (Eds.), Models of discovery and creativity. Dordrecht: Springer. McAllister, J. W. (1989). Truth and beauty in scientific reason. Synthese, 78, 25–51. McAllister, J. W. (1996). Beauty and revolution in science. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Meijer Miriam, C. (1999). Race and aesthetics in the anthropology of Petrus Camper (1722–1789)., Studies in the history of ideas in the low countries Amsterdam-Atlanta: Rodopi Editions. Nickles, T. (1984). Positive science and discoverability. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1984, 13–27. Nickles, T. (1985). Beyond divorce: Current status of the discovery debate. Philosophy of Science, 52, 177–206. Nickles, T. (1989). Truth or consequences? Generative versus consequential justification in science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1988, 393–405. Niekerk, C. (2004). “Man and orangutan in eighteenth-century thinking: Retracing the early history of Dutch and German anthropology. Monatshefte, 96, 477–502. Nisbet, H. S. (1972). Goethe and the scientific tradition. London: Univ. of London Institute of Germanic Studies. North, J. H. (2012). Winckelmann “Philosophy of Art”: A Prelude to German Classicism (p. 2012). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Opitz, J. M. (2004). Goethe’s bone and the beginnings of morphology. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 126A, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.20619. Popper, K. R. (2014). The logic of scientific discovery. Mansfield Centre: Martino Publishing. Potts, A. (1994). Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History. New Haven: Yale University Press. Pugliese, J. (2004). Demonstrative evidence: A genealogy of racial iconography of forensic art and illustration. Law and Critique, 15, 287–320. Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Richards, R. (2004). The romantic conception of life: Science and philosophy in the age of Goethe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1984). On paradigms and revolutions in science and art: The challenge of interpretation. Art Journal, 44, 109–118. Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1985). Visual thinking: The art of imagining reality. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 75(6), 50–67. Schaffner, K. (1980). Discovery in the biomedical sciences: Logic or irrational institution. In T. Nickles & L. Guy (Eds.), Scientific discovery: Case studies, Leonard Memorail conference in philosophy (p. 195). Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Schaffner, K. (1993). Discovery and explanation in biology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Schickore, J. (2018). “Scientific discovery”, The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2018 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Schmitt, S. (2001). Type et métamorphose dans la morphologie de Goethe, entre classicisme et romantisme. Revue d’histoire des Sciences, 54, 495–521. Steigerwald, J. (2002). Goethe’s morphology: Urphänomene and aesthetic appraisal. Journal of the History of Biology, 35, 291–328. Tauber, A. (1997). The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Tautz, B. (2007). Reading and seeing ethnic differences in the enlightenment. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Tyson, E. (1699). Orang-Outang, sive homo sylvestris: Or, the anatomy of a pygmie compared with that of a monkey, an ape, and a man. London: Bennet. Visser, R. W. (1985). The zoological work of Petrus Camper (1722–1789). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Rodopi. von Mücke, D. (2006). Goethe's metamorphosis: Changing forms in nature, the life sciences, and authorship. Representations, 95, 27–53. Wartofsky, M. (1980). Scientific judgment: Creativity and discovery in scientific thought. In T. Nickles & L. Guy (Eds.), Scientific discovery: Case studies, Leonard Memorail conference in philosophy. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Wells, G. A. (1967). Goethe and the Inter maxillary bone. The British Journal for the History of Science, 3(4), 348–361. Whewell, W., 1996 [1840], The philosophy of the inductive sciences (Volume II), London: Routledge/Thoemmes. Wilkins, J. S., & Ebach, M. (2014). The nature of classification: Relationships and kinds in the natural sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Winckelmann, J. J., & Lodge, G. H. (1850). The history of ancient art among the Greeks. London: John Chapman. (Original work published 1764). Winckelmann, J. J., & Lodge, G. H. (1880). The history of ancient art. Boston: J. R. Osgood and Company. (Original work published 1764). Zammito, J. H. (2018). The gestation of German biology: Philosophy and physiology from Stahl to schelling. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.