The admissibility of scientific evidence in psychiatric malpractice: junk science and the Daubert case

293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923) 293 F. 1014 (D.C. Cir. 1923) Huber, 1991, Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom, 228 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 113 S.Ct. 2791 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 113 S.Ct. 2792 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 727 F.Supp. 570 (S.D. Cal. 1989) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 113 S.Ct. 1796 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 113 S.Ct. 2796–2797 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 113 S.Ct. 1797 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 113 S.Ct. 2797 (1993) Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc. 113 S.Ct. 2799 (1993) Tancredi, 1989, Psychiatric Malpractice Giannini, 1982, Neurology and the judicial system: Confrontation or conciliation?, Case and Comment, 87, 19 1991 Dreyfuss R C. Implications of Daubert v. Merrell Dow. (unpublished manuscript). 1993 McClintock, 1990, ‘Junk Science’ or Cutting-Edge Expert Testimony?, The Digest: A Medical Liability and Risk Management Newsletter, 21, 1