Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Động thái Thời gian của Nhược điểm Khu dân cư trong Thời thơ ấu và Hành vi Vấn đề tiếp theo trong Tuổi vị thành niên
Tóm tắt
Nghiên cứu về tác động của khu dân cư đã ngày càng tập trung nhiều hơn vào khoảng thời gian mà trẻ em sống ở một khu dân cư nghèo trong thời ấu thơ (thời lượng), nhưng thường bỏ qua việc khi nào trong thời thơ ấu mà sự phơi nhiễm này xảy ra (thời điểm) cũng như liệu điều kiện khu dân cư đang được cải thiện hay tồi tệ đi (trình tự). Trong bài báo này, các tác giả đã áp dụng phân tích chuỗi để đồng thời ghi nhận thời lượng, thời điểm, và trình tự của sự phơi nhiễm với tình trạng của khu dân cư (kém) ưu đãi trong thời thơ ấu. Phân tích hồi quy logistic sau đó được sử dụng để kiểm tra cách mà các mô hình phơi nhiễm khác nhau có liên quan đến tình trạng làm cha mẹ ở tuổi vị thành niên, bỏ học, và hành vi phạm tội. Sử dụng dữ liệu đăng ký từ Hà Lan, một toàn bộ nhóm đã được theo dõi từ khi sinh ra vào năm 1995 cho đến 19 tuổi vào năm 2014 (N = 168.645, 48,8% là nữ, 83,2% là người Hà Lan bản địa). So với trẻ em đã sống ở một khu dân cư nghèo suốt thời thơ ấu, trẻ em chỉ bị phơi nhiễm với sự suy thoái của khu dân cư trong độ tuổi vị thành niên có khả năng tương đương trở thành cha mẹ tuổi vị thành niên và thậm chí có khả năng bỏ học cao hơn. Điều không ngờ tới, trẻ em đã sống trong một khu dân cư thịnh vượng suốt thời thơ ấu lại có khả năng cao nhất tham gia vào hành vi phạm tội. Các giải thích và ý nghĩa có thể được thảo luận.
Từ khóa
#khu dân cư nghèo #thời điểm #thời lượng #trình tự #hành vi vấn đề #tuổi vị thành niên #phân tích chuỗi #Hà LanTài liệu tham khảo
Aassve, A., Billari, F. C., & Piccarreta, R. (2007). Strings of adulthood: a sequence analysis of young British women’s work-family trajectories. European Journal of Population, 23(3-4), 369–388.
Abbott, A., & Tsay, A. (2000). Sequence analysis and optimal matching methods in Sociology. Sociological Methods & Research, 29(1), 3–33.
Anderson, A., Leventhal, T., & Dupéré, V. (2014). Exposure to neighborhood affluence and poverty in childhood and adolescence and academic achievement and behavior. Applied Developmental Science, 18(3), 123–138.
Bakker, B., van Rooijen, J., & van Toor, L. (2014). The system of social statistical datasets of Statistics Netherlands: An integral approach to the production of register-based social statistics. Journal of the International Association for Official Statistics, 30(1), 1–14.
Beyers, J. M., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Neighborhood structure, parenting processes, and the development of youth’s externalizing behaviors: a multilevel analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 35–53.
Billari, F. C. (2001). Sequence analysis in demographic research. Canadian Studies in Population, 28(2), 439–458.
Brooks-Gunn, J., Duncan, G. J., Klebanov, P. K., & Sealand, N. (1993). Do neighborhoods influence child and adolescent development? American Journal of Sociology, 99(2), 353–395.
Caughy, M. O., Nettles, S. M., & O’Campo, P. J. (2008). The effect of residential neighborhood on child behavior problems in first grade. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42, 39–50.
Cheshire, P. (2012). Are mixed community policies evidence based? A review of the research on neighbourhood effects. In M. Van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. (pp. 267–294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: new evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106(4), 855–902.
Coren, S. A., & Luthar, S. S. (2014). Pursuing perfection: distress and interpersonal functioning among adolescent boys in single-sex and co-educational independent schools. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 931–946.
Coulton, C. J., Jennings, M. Z., & Chan, T. (2013). How big is my neighborhood? Individual and contextual effects on perceptions of neighborhood scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 140–150.
Crane, J. (1991). The epidemic theory of ghettos and neighborhood effects on dropping out and teenage childbearing. American Journal of Sociology, 96(5), 1226–1259.
Crowder, K., & South, S. J. (2011). Spatial and temporal dimensions of neighborhood effects on high school graduation. Social Science Research, 40(1), 87–106.
Damm, A. P., & Dustmann, C. (2014). Does growing up in a high crime neighborhood affect youth criminal behavior? American Economic Review, 104(6), 1806–1832.
Elder, G. H. (1998). The life course as developmental theory. Child Development, 69, 1–12.
Firth, D. (1993). Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Biometrika, 80, 27–38.
Friedrichs, J. R., & Blasius, J. R. (2003). Social norms in distressed neighbourhoods: testing the Wilson hypothesis. Housing Studies, 18(6), 807–826.
Gaias, L.M., Lindstrom Johnson, S., White, R.M.B., Pettigrew, J., & Dumka, L. (2017). Understanding school–neighborhood mesosystemic effects on adolescent development. Adolescent Research Review (published online).
Galster, G. (2012). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, L. Simpson, N. Bailey & D. Maclennan (eds.), Neighbourhood effect research. (pp. 23–56). Dordrecht: Springer.
Heckman, J. J. (2006). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312(5782), 1900–1902.
Ingoldsby, E. M., Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E., Schonberg, M., Gilliom, M., & Criss, M. M. (2006). Neighborhood disadvantage, parent-child conflict, neighborhood peer relationships, and early antisocial behavior problem trajectories. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 303–319.
Karlson, K., Holm, A., & Breen, R. (2012). Comparing regression coefficients between same-sample nested models using logit and probit: a new method. Sociological Methodology, 42, 286–313.
Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. (1990). Finding groups in data. New York: Wiley.
Kiesner, J., Poulin, F., & Nicotra, E. (2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74, 1328–1343.
King, G., & Zeng, L. (2001). Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis, 9(2), 137–163.
Kleinepier, T., & van Ham, M. (2017). The temporal stability of children’s neighborhood experiences: a follow-up from birth to age 15. Demographic Research, 36(59), 1813–1826.
Kleinepier, T., van Ham, M., & Nieuwenhuis, J. (2018). Ethnic differences in timing and duration of exposure to neighborhood disadvantage during childhood. Advances in Life Course Research, 36, 92–104.
Kleinhans, R. (2004). Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: a review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 367–390.
Kling, J. R., Ludwig, J., & Katz, L. F. (2005). Neighborhood effects on crime for female and male youth: evidence from a randomized housing voucher experiment . Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 87–130.
Kulis, S., Marsiglia, F. F., Sicotte, D., & Nieri, T. (2007). Neighborhood effects on youth substance use in a Southwestern city. Sociological Perspectives, 50(2), 273–301.
Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309–337.
Levels, M., Need, A., Nieuwenhuis, R., Sluiter, R., & Ultee, W. (2010). Unintended pregnancy and induced abortion in the Netherlands 1954-2002. European Sociological Review, 28(3), 301–318.
Ludwig, J., Duncan, G. J., Gennetian, L. A., Katz, L. F., Kessler, R. C., Kling, J. R., & Sanbonmatsu, L. (2013). Long-term neighborhood effects on low-income families: evidence from Moving to Opportunity. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 103(3), 226–231.
Luthar, S. S., Barkin, S. H., & Crossman, E. J. (2013). “I can, therefore I must”: Fragility in the upper middle classes. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1529–1549.
McCulloch, A., & Joshi, H. E. (2001). Neighbourhood and family influences on the cognitive ability of children in the British National Child Development Study. Social Science & Medicine, 53(5), 579–591.
Miltenburg, E. (2017). A different place to different people: conditional neighbourhood effects on residents’ socio-economic status. PhD thesis.
Moore, K. A., Glei, D. A., Driscoll, A. K., Zaslow, M. J., & Redd, Z. (2002). Poverty and welfare patterns: implications for children. Journal of Social Policy, 31(2), 207–227.
Morris, T., Manley, D., & van Ham, M. (2018). Context or composition: how does neighbourhood deprivation impact upon adolescent smoking behaviour? PLoS ONE, 3(2), e0192566.
Nieuwenhuis, J., & Hooimeijer, P. (2016). The association between neighbourhoods and educational achievement, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(2), 321–347.
Nieuwenhuis, J., van Ham, M., Yu, R., Branje, S., Meeus, W., & Hooimeijer, P. (2017). Being poorer than the rest of the neighborhood: relative deprivation and problem behavior of youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(9), 1891–1904.
OECD (2013). Adjusting household incomes; equivalence scales. OECD Project on Income Distribution and Poverty. http://www.oecd.org/eco/growth/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf.
Plybon, L. E., & Kliewer, W. (2001). Neighborhood types and externalizing behavior in urban school-age children: tests of direct, mediated, and moderated effects. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 10, 419–437.
Prinstein, M. J., & Dodge, K. A. (2008). Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.
Schwartz, A. (2006). Housing policy in the United States: an introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
Sharkey, P., & Faber, J. W. (2014). Where, when, why and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 559–579.
South, S. J., & Crowder, K. (2010). Neighborhood poverty and nonmarital fertility: spatial and temporal dimensions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(1), 89–104.
Sucoff, C. A., & Upchurch, D. M. (1998). Neighborhood context and the risk of childbearing among metropolitan-area Black adolescents. American Sociological Review, 63(4), 571–585.
Tunstall, H., Cabieses, B., & Shaw, R. (2012). The characteristics of mobile families with young children in England and the impact of their moves on neighbourhood inequalities in maternal and child health. Health Place, 18(3), 657–670.
Varano, S. P., Schafer, J. A., Cancino, J. M., & Swatt, M. L. (2009). Constructing crime: neighborhood characteristics and police recording behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(6), 553–563.
Wagmiller, R. L., Lennon, M. C., Kuang, L., Alberti, P. M., & Aber, J. L. (2006). The dynamics of economic disadvantage and children’s life chances. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 847–866.
Wheaton, B., & Clarke, P. (2003). Space meets time: integrating temporal and contextual influences on mental health in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 68(5), 680–706.
Wodtke, G. T. (2013). Duration and timing of exposure to neighborhood poverty and the risk of adolescent parenthood. Demography, 50(5), 1765–1788.
Wodtke, G. T., Harding, D. J., & Elwert, F. (2011). Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective: the impact of long-term exposure to concentrated disadvantage on high school graduation. American Sociological Review, 76(5), 713–736.
Wodtke, G. T., Elwert, F., & Harding, D. J. (2016). Neighborhood effect heterogeneity by family income and developmental period. American Journal of Sociology, 121(4), 1168–1222.
Zwiers, M., Bolt, G., van Ham, M., & van Kempen, R. (2016). The global financial crisis and neighborhood decline. Urban Geography, 37(5), 664–684.