The Susceptibility of Monocotyledons to Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Journal of Phytopathology - Tập 113 Số 1 - Trang 81-89 - 1985
Marcel De Cleene1
1Laboratorium voor Microbiologie en microbiële Genetica, Laboratorium voor Plantenfysiologie, Rijksuniversiteit te Gent, België

Tóm tắt

AbstractThe susceptibility of 257 monocotyledon species belonging to 139 genera and 27 families, has been tested and the literature on this subject reviewed. In contrast with dicotyledons and gymnosperms, monocotyledons are much less susceptible to Agrobacterium tumefaciens: only 3 % of the species of monocotyledons tested were host plants, whereas 60 % of the dicotyledons and gymnosperms were susceptible. Only the closely related monocotyledon orders Liliales (6 families) and Arales (1 family) contained species that were susceptible. These results are consistent with a proposed taxonomic relationship between the Liliales and the dicotyledons. A correlation between host biochemical capabilities and susceptibility to crown gall is suggested.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Amormino G., 1927, Richerche sull'azione del Bacterium tumefaciens negli animali, Boll. D. Soc. di Biol. Sper., 2

Anonymous, 1976, The Staff of the University of the Liberty Hyde Bailey Hortorium

Braun A. C., 1958, Morphology and physiology of plant tumors. Protoplasmatologia X, Pathologie des protoplasmas, 5, 1

Brown N. A., 1937, Crown gall of the fasciated type on Asparagus sprengeri, Plant Disease Reporter, 21, 31

10.1038/2141029a0

Chamberlain C. J., 1935, Methods in plant histology

10.1139/cjr50c-015

DeCleene M. 1975:Bijdragen tot de waardplanten de inductie en de karyologie van crown gall.Doctoral thesis Rijksuniversiteit Gent (Belgium).

Cleene M., 1973, Het voorkomen van Agrobacterium kanker (crown gall) bij economisch belangrijke plantegeslachten, De Belg. Tuinbouw, 54, 196

10.1007/BF02860827

10.1007/BF02868853

Ley J., 1972, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Pl. Path. Bacteria, 251

Elliott C., 1930, Manual of bacterial plant pathogens

Englfr A., 1964, H. Melchior und E. Werdermann

Gadgil V. N., 1961, Studies on crown gall tumour. I Host susceptibility of the causal organism, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, strain B‐23, Trans. Bose Res. Inst., 24, 141

Gal L, 1963, Über die Wirkung von Monokotyledonen‐Extrakten auf Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Zentralbl. Bakt., 116, 246

10.1007/BF01185602

10.1002/j.1460-2075.1984.tb02254.x

Hoerner G. R., 1945, Crown gall of hops, Plant Disease Reporter, 29, 98

INDEX KEWENSIS

Jakowsra S., 1949, Effects of Bacterium tumefaciens on Allium cepa, Phytopathology, 39, 683

Johansen D. A., 1940, Plant microtechniques

10.1086/400904

Kupila S., 1963, Crown gall as an anatomical and cytological problem, a review. Cancer Res., 23, 497

10.1016/B978-1-4831-9954-2.50006-9

Lopatin M. I., 1936, The susceptibility of plants to Bacterium tumefaciens, the causative agent of the root‐cancer of plants, Mikrobiologia (Moskwa, 5, 716

McLean R. C., 1962, Textbook of theoretical Botany

Montemartini L., 1938, II. Bacterium tumefaciens, Boll. Ist. Sieroter. Milanese, 17, 551

10.2307/2437836

10.1038/nbt0483-175

Smith E. F., 1911, Crown gall of plants: its cause and remedy. U.S. Dept. Agric., Bur, Plant Industr. Bull., 213, 13

Smith E. F., 1926, A Begonia immune to crown gall: with observations on other immune or semi‐immune plants, Phytopathology, 16, 491

Stapp C., 1938, Der Pflanzenkrebs und sein Erreger Pseudomonas tumefaciens. VI. Asparagus sprengeri Rgl. und Phaseolus vulgaris L. als Wirtspflanzen, Zentralbl. Bakt., Abt, 116

Strauss J., 1954, Maize endosperm tissue grown in vitro, Amer. J. Bot., 41, 487

Takhtajan A., 1969, Origin and dispersal

10.1007/BF02861558

10.2307/2440606

10.1038/2121472a0

Zander R., 1979, Handwörterbuch der Pflanzennamen