Nội dung được dịch bởi AI, chỉ mang tính chất tham khảo
Cuộc chiến giành sự chắc chắn: An ninh tồn tại, sự gia tăng chủ nghĩa dân tộc và căng thẳng Australia-Trung Quốc sau COVID-19
Tóm tắt
Quan hệ Australia-Trung Quốc đã tương đối ổn định trong vòng một thập kỷ qua. Tuy nhiên, ngay sau khi bùng phát COVID-19, Australia đã có một lập trường ngày càng quyết đoán đối với Trung Quốc, thậm chí còn mạnh mẽ hơn cả các đồng minh phương Tây của mình. Điều gì đã thúc đẩy Australia áp dụng chính sách cứng rắn hơn đối với Trung Quốc? Bài viết này lập luận rằng COVID-19 đã mang lại sự bất định đáng kể cho hệ thống quốc tế và do đó, cho môi trường bên ngoài của Australia, điều này đã ảnh hưởng đến việc ra quyết định của nước này, thúc đẩy sự hình thành của một chính sách cứng rắn đối với Trung Quốc. Một yếu tố góp phần vào chính sách này là sự tìm kiếm an ninh tồn tại của Australia, điều này, trong bối cảnh của COVID-19, đã kích thích sự gia tăng tâm lý chống Trung Quốc. Đồng thời, chiến lược này đã phản tác dụng khi gặp phải chủ nghĩa dân tộc của Trung Quốc, làm tăng thêm sự chia rẽ chính trị, kéo hai nước vào một cuộc đối đầu ngoại giao chưa từng có. Cốt lõi của an ninh tồn tại nằm ở việc duy trì sự ổn định của bản sắc cần thiết cho việc hình thành chính sách nhất quán. Những bất định do đại dịch COVID-19 đã làm thay đổi môi trường bên ngoài quen thuộc và thách thức khả năng của Australia để diễn giải môi trường mới này và điều chỉnh theo nó, từ đó gây ra sự không an toàn tồn tại. Bằng cách phân tích bản sắc của Australia như một cường quốc trung gian trong bối cảnh an ninh khu vực đang thay đổi và cam kết với một số giá trị nhất định, bài viết cho thấy cách mà COVID-19 đã thúc đẩy cuộc tìm kiếm an ninh tồn tại của Australia, điều đã làm thay đổi chính sách của nước này đối với Trung Quốc.
Từ khóa
#Australia #Trung Quốc #COVID-19 #an ninh tồn tại #chủ nghĩa dân tộc #quan hệ quốc tếTài liệu tham khảo
Albertoni, Nicolás, and Carol Wise. 2020. International trade norms in the age of Covid-19 nationalism on the rise? Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00288-1.
Allen, John, Nicholas Burns, Laurie Garrett, Richard N. Haass, G. John Ikenberry, Kishore Mahbubani, Shivshankar Menon, Robin Niblett, Joseph S. Nye Jr, Shannon K. O’neil, Kori Schake, Stephen M. Walt 2020. How the world will look after the coronavirus pandemic. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/20/world-order-after-coroanvirus-pandemic/. Accessed 16 June 2020.
Associated Press 2020. Australia prime minister supports changes to World Health Organization. 24 April. Retrieved from https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1264158/australia-prime-minister-supports-changes-to-world-health-organization. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Australian Department of Defence. 2013. Defence White Paper 2013: 25. Retrieved from https://www.defence.gov.au/whitepaper/2013/docs/WP_2013_web.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Australian Government. 2017. 2017 Foreign Policy White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/2017-foreign-policy-whitepaper.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Bagshaw, Eryk. 2020. No longer a joke: Why Australia’s COVID-19 inquiry campaign won the day. Sydney Morning Herald. 20 May. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/no-longer-a-joke-how-australia-s-covid-19-inquiry-campaign-won-the-day-20200520-p54uoa.html. Accessed 20 Oct 2020.
Berenskoetter, Felix. 2014. Parameters of a national biography. European journal of international relations 20 (1): 262–288.
Bisley, Nick. 2016. Australia’s strategic culture and asia’s changing regional order. NBR Special Report 60. Retrieved from https://www.nbr.org/wpcontent/uploads/pdfs/publications/special_report_60_australias_strategic_culture_december2016.pdf. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Blakkarly, Jarni and Goncalves, Ricardo. 2020. Australia is in recession for the first time in 29 years - here’s what it means for you. SBS News. 3 June. Retrieved from https://www.sbs.com.au/news/australia-is-in-recession-for-the-first-time-in-29-years-here-s-what-it-means-for-you. Accessed 15 June 2020.
Bloomfield, Alan. 2015. To balance or to bandwagon? Adjusting to China’s rise during Australia’s Rudd-Gillard ear. The Pacific Review 29 (2): 259–282.
Boylan, Brandon M., Jerry McBeath, and Bo Wang. 2020. US–China Relations: Nationalism, the trade war, and COVID-19. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-020-00302-6.
Carr, Andrew. 2014. Is Australia a middle power? A systemic impact approach. Australian Journal of International Affairs 68 (1): 70–84.
Chang, Yung-Yung. 2020. The Post-Pandemic World: between Constitutionalized and Authoritarian Orders – China’s Narrative-Power Play in the Pandemic Era. Journal of Chinese Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09695-3.
Chaudhury, Dipanjan Roy. 2019. India’s fine balancing act with Quad and BRICS meet in New York, Economic Times, 28 Sept. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/indias-fine-balancing-act-with-quad-and-brics-meet-in-new-york/articleshow/71338616.cms?from=mdr. Accessed 10 Oct 2020.
Chong, Alan, and Quang Minh Pham. 2019. Critical Reflections on China’s Belt & Road Initiative, 151. New York: Springer.
Australia, House of representatives. 1964. Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates. 11 March: 486. Retrieved from http://historichansard.net/hofreps/1964/19640311_reps_25_hor41/. Accessed 11 Nov 2020.
Dalzell, Stephanie. 2020. Scott Morrison says Australia won’t respond to Chinese ‘coercion’ over warning about universities. ABC News. 12 June. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-11/australia-morrison-china-respond-coercion-on-universities/12342924. Accessed 15 Aug 2020.
Helen Davidson. 2020. Hong Kong using Covid-19 crisis as ‘golden opportunity’ for crackdown, says arrested leader. The Guardian. 20 April. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/20/hong-kong-using-covid-19-crisis-as-golden-opportunity-for-crackdown-says-arrested-leader. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Department of Defence, Australian Government 2020. 2020 Defence Strategic Update. July 1. Retrieved from https://www1.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/2020-11/2020_Defence_Strategic_Update.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2020.
Department of Defence, Australian Government 2020. 2020 Defence Strategic Update and 2020 Force Structure Plan. Retrieved from https://www.defence.gov.au/StrategicUpdate-2020/. Accessed 12 June.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 2020. Statement on Hong Kong. 10 April. Retrieved from https://www.dfat.gov.au/news/news/statement-hong-kong. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Downer, Alexander. 2019. A strategy for Morrison to succeed in Washington. Financial Review. 14 July. Retrieved from https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/a-strategy-for-morrison-to-succeed-in-washington-20190714-p5270n. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Stephen Dziedzic. 2020. Australia reaffirms American alliance but resists push for further exercises in South China Sea. ABC News. 20 July. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-07-29/ausmin-talks-defence-south-china-sea-darwin-fuel-reserve/12501548. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Evans, Gareth. 1990. Foreign Policy and Good International Citizenship. 6 March. Retrieved from http://www.gevans.org/speeches/old/1990/060390_fm_fpandgoodinternationalcitizen.pdf. Accessed 15 October 2020.
Geoff, Raby. 2020. Australia resolves China contradictions at last. Financial Review. 10 July. Retrieved from https://www.afr.com/world/asia/australia-resolves-china-contradictions-at-last-20200709-p55alr.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. University Press: 37.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and self-identity: 55.
Giddens, Anthony. 2013. The consequences of modernity. Hoboken. John Wiley & Sons.
Gilbert, Kieran, and Bishop, Julie. 2018. Interview with Kieran Gilbert, Sky News. Retrieved from https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/julie-bishop/transcript-eoe/interview-kieran-gilbert-sky-news-1. Accessed 11 June 2020.
Givens, John Wagner, and Evan Mistur. 2020. The Sincerest Form of Flattery: Nationalist Emulation during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Chinese Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09702-7.
Grant, Stan. 2020. Coronavirus has sped up changes to global order and sovereignty is making a comeback. ABC News. 13 April. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-13/coronavirus-changes-to-global-order-us-china/12139216. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Greene, Andrew, and La, Xavier. 2018. US military to send large aircraft contingent to Darwin as part of troop rotation. ABC News. 24 January 2017. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-01-24/us-military-aircraft-marines-darwin-stars-and-stripes-australia/8206768. Accessed 15 June 2020.
Hiko, Aly and Wang, Austin. 2020. COVID-19 Pandemic and Nationalism. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3660002. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Huang, Qingming. 2020. The pandemic and the transformation of liberal international order. Journal of Chinese Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09698-0.
Hurst, Daniel. 2020. Australia making its presence felt at WHO while backing calls for major reform. The Guardian. 17 May. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/16/australia-making-its-presence-felt-at-who-while-backing-calls-for-major-reform. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Hurst, Daniel. 2020. Australia hails global support for independent coronavirus investigation. The Guardian. 18 May. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/18/australia-wins-international-support-for-independent-coronavirus-inquiry. Accessed 21 Oct 2020.
Huysmans, Jef. 1998. Security! What do you mean? From concept to thick signifier. European journal of international relations 4 (2): 242.
Kinnvall, Catarina. 2004. Globalization and religious nationalism: Self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political Psychology 25 (5): 741–767.
Kinnvall, Catarina, and Jennifer Mitzen. 2020. Anxiety, fear, and ontological security in world politics: thinking with and beyond Giddens. International Theory 12 (2): 244.
Korolev, Alexander. 2019. Shrinking room for hedging: system-unit dynamics and behavior of smaller powers. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 19: 419–452.
Kuo, Lily. 2020. Australia called ‘gum stuck to China’s shoe’ by state media in coronavirus investigation stoush. The Guardian. 28 April, 2020. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/28/australia-called-gum-stuck-to-chinas-shoe-by-state-media-in-coronavirus-investigation-stoush. Accessed 9 July 2020.
Laing, Robert. 2010. The divided self: An existential study in sanity and madness. London: Penguin U.K.
Lang, Anthony F., Jr. 2012. Agency and ethics: the politics of military intervention, 13. Albany: SUNY Press.
Lindemann, Thomas. 2011. Causes of war: The struggle for recognition. Vol. 25. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Lindemann, Thomas, and Eric Ringmar. 2011. International politics of recognition, 6. Abingdon: Routledge.
Macmillan, Jade, and Greene, Andrew. 2020. Australia to spend $270b building larger military to prepare for ‘poorer, more dangerous’ world and rise of China. ABC News, June 30. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-06-30/australia-unveils-10-year-defence-strategy/12408232. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Makarychev, Andrey, and Tatiana Romashko. 2020. Precarious sovereignty in a post-liberal Europe: The COVID-19 emergency in Estonia and Finland. Chinese Political Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-020-00165-y.
Manicom, James, and Jeffrey Reeves. 2014. Locating middle powers in international relations theory and power transition. In Middle Power and the Rise of China, ed. Bruce Gilley and Andrew O’Neil, 23–44. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Medcalf, R. 2015. The Temperature in Canberra as the South China Sea Boils. Asia maritime transparency initiative. 4 June. Retrieved from https://amti.csis.org/the-temperature-in-canberra-as-the-south-china-sea-boils/. Accessed 8 June 2020.
Megalogenis, George. 2020. Beware the bully who is supposed to be watching Australia’s back. Sydney Morning Herald. 21 May. Retrieved from https://www.smh.com.au/national/beware-the-bully-who-is-supposed-to-be-watching-australia-s-back-20200521-p54v72.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2020.
Mitzen, Jennifer. 2006. Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European journal of international relations 12 (3).
Nadkarni, Vidya. 2010. Strategic partnerships in Asia: Balancing without alliances. London: Routledge.
Natasha, Kassam. 2020. COVIDPOLL: lowy institute polling on Australian attitudes to the coronavirus pandemic. Retrieved from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/covidpoll-lowy-institute-polling-australian-attitudes-coronavirus-pandemic. Accessed 21 Oct 2020.
Marise Payne. 2020. “Statement on arrests of pro-democracy figures in Hong Kong”. 19 April. Retrieved from https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/marise-payne/media-release/statement-arrests-pro-democracy-figures-hong-kong. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Marise Payne. 2020. “Statement on Hong Kong”. 1 July. Retrieved from https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/marise-payne/media-release/statement-hong-kong-0. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Reuters. 2020. Vietnam protests Beijing’s expansion in disputed South China Sea as world remains occupied with coronavirus. ABC News. 20 April. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-20/vietnam-protests-beijings-expansion-in-disputed-south-china-sea/12165646. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Ringmar, Erik. 1996. On the ontological status of the state. European Journal of International Relations 2 (4): 439–466.
Ringmar, Eric. 1996. Identity, interest and action a cultural explanation of Sweden’s intervention in the thirty years’ war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steele, Brent J. 2007. Making words matter: The Asian tsunami, Darfur, and “reflexive discourse” in international politics. International Studies Quarterly 51 (4): 901–925.
Steele, Brent J. 2008. Ontological security in international relations: Abingdon: Routledge: 16.
Ungerer, Carl. 2007. The “middle power” concept in Australian foreign policy. Australian Journal of Politics & History 53 (4): 538–551.
Ungerer, Carl. 2018. Whose rules? In which order? Australian Institute of international affairs. 25 May. Retrieved from http://www.internationalaffairs.org.au/australianoutlook/whose-rules-in-which-order/ Accessed 16 Oct 2020.
van Nieuwenhuizen, Simone. 2019. Australian and People’s Republic of China government conceptions of the international order. Australian Journal of International Affairs 73 (2): 181–197.
Wang, Zhaohui, and Zhiqiang Sun. 2020. From Globalization to Regionalization: The United States, China, and the Post-Covid-19 World Economic Order. Journal of Chinese Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09706-3.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 224.
Wendt, Alexander. 2004. The state as person in international theory. Review of international studies 30 (2): 290.
Wheeler, Nicholas J., and Tim Dunne. 1998. Good international citizenship: a third way for British foreign policy. International Affairs 74 (4): 847–870.
White, Hugh. 2017. Without America: Australia in the New Asia. Quarterly Essay 68: 45.
White, Hugh. 2017. America or China? Australia is fooling itself that it doesn’t have to choose. The Guardian. 27 November. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/nov/27/america-or-china-were-fooling-ourselves-that-we-dont-have-to-choose Accessed 20 Oct 2020.
White, Hugh. 2017. Without America: Australia in the New Asia. Quarterly Essay 68: 45.
Wilkins, Thomas. 2017. Australia and middle power approaches to Asia Pacific regionalism. Australian Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 110–125.
Worthington, Brett. 2020. Marise Payne calls for global inquiry into China’s handling of the coronavirus outbreak. ABC News. 19 April. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-19/payne-calls-for-inquiry-china-handling-of-coronavirus-covid-19/12162968. Accessed 10 Nov 2020.
Yang, Yifan, and Xuechen Chen. Globalism or nationalism? The Paradox of Chinese Official Discourse in the Context of the COVID-19 Outbreak. Journal of Chinese Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-020-09697-1.