The Role of Defensive Confidence in Preference for Proattitudinal Information: How Believing That One Is Strong Can Sometimes Be a Defensive Weakness

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin - Tập 30 Số 12 - Trang 1565-1584 - 2004
Dolores Albarracín, Amy L. Mitchell1
1University of Florida

Tóm tắt

This series of studies identified individuals who chronically believe that they can successfully defend their attitudes from external attack and investigated the consequences of this individual difference for selective exposure to attitude-incongruent information and, ultimately, attitude change. Studies 1 and 2 validated a measure of defensive confidence as an individual difference that is unidimensional, distinct from other personality measures, reliable over a 2-week interval, and organized as a trait that generalizes across various personal and social issues. Studies 3 and 4 provided evidence that defensive confidence decreases preference for proattitudinal information, therefore inducing greater reception of counterattitudinal materials. Study 5 demonstrated that people who are high in defensive confidence are more likely to change their attitudes as a result of exposure to counterattitudinal information and examined the perceptions that mediate this important phenomenon.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Adorno, T. W., 1950, The authoritarian personality

10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80004-1

10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.453

Altemeyer, R. A., 1969, Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 4, 417

Aronoff, Y. S., 2001, Profiling political leaders: Cross-cultural studies of personality and behavior, 185

Bandura, A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control

10.1037/0022-3514.71.4.637

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1961.tb01666.x

10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1032

Cannon, L. K., 1964, Conflict, decision and dissonance, 83

Eagly, A. H., 1993, The psychology of attitudes

Festinger, L., 1957, A theory of cognitive dissonance, 10.1515/9781503620766

Festinger, L., 1964, Conflict, decision and dissonance

10.1037/h0022670

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60212-9

10.1080/00223980.1940.9917000

10.1016/0191-8869(95)00192-1

10.1037/0022-3514.70.1.172

Johnson, B. T., Resistance and persuasion

10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.19

10.1177/002190968201700104

10.1002/1097-4679(197507)31:3<402::AID-JCLP2270310304>3.0.CO;2-V

10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60052-0

10.1037/h0042026

10.1016/0022-1031(79)90014-3

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1982.tb00744.x

Paul, G. L., 1966, Insight vs. desensitization in psychotherapy

10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.722

10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1

10.1037/h0060752

10.1086/267337

10.1515/9781400876136

10.1037/h0092976

Rucker, D. D., meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association

Scheussler, K. F., 1982, Measuring social life feelings

10.1037/h0037039

Snyder, M., 1987, Public appearance/private realities: The psychology of self-monitoring

10.1111/1467-8721.00117

10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1298

10.1037/h0027806

10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049

Wechsler, D., 1955, Manual for theWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.36

10.4135/9781446279212.n10

10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00139.x