The Rise and Fall of the Science Advisor to the President of the United States
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Anonymous. 1945. Middlebury gives Killian honorary doctor’s degree. The Tech 65: 4, June 1. http://www-tech.mit.edu/archives/VOL_065/TECH_V065_S0085_P004.pdf .
Anonymous. 1957. Degree for Killian. The Tech 77: 1, April 26.
Blanpied, William A. 1995. Introduction to impacts of the early Cold War on the formulation of U.S. science policy. Washington, DC: AAAS. http://www.aaas.org/spp/cstc/pne/pubs/golden/golden.pdf .
Broad, William. 2001. Government reviving ties to scientists. The New York Times, November 20.
Bromley, David. 1994. The president’s scientists: Reminiscences of a White House science advisor. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Bronk, Detlev. 1974. Science advice in the White House: The genesis of the president’s science advisers and the National Science Foundation. Science 186: 116–121. doi: 10.1126/science.186.4159.116 .
Brumfiel, Geoff. 2004. US science policy: Mission impossible? Nature 428: 250–251. doi: 10.1038/428250a .
Damms, Richard. 2000. James Killian, the technological capabilities panel, and the emergence of President Eisenhower’s “scientific-technological elite”. Diplomatic History 24: 57–78. doi: 10.1111/1467-7709.00198 .
Doel, Ronald, and Kristine Harper. 2006. Prometheus unleashed: Science as a diplomatic weapon in the Lyndon B. Johnson administration. Global Power Knowledge: Science and Technology in International Affairs 21: 66–85.
Dupree, A.Hunter. 1963. Central scientific organization in the United States government. Minerva 1: 453–469. doi: 10.1007/BF01107188 .
Eisenhower, Dwight. 1957. Text of address by the President delivered from the oval office in the White House on “science in national security”. November 7: 6. http://www.eisenhower.utexas.edu/dl/Sputnik/PresidentialAddressNov71957pg6.pdf .
Finney, John. 1957. Killian takes the oath as U.S. scientific coordinator. The New York Times, November 16: 1.
GAO (Government Accountability Office). 2004. Federal advisory committees: Additional guidance could help agencies better ensure independence and balance. GAO-04-328.
Glanz, James. 2001. The nation: Blue sky; sure, it’s rocket science, but who needs scientists? The New York Times, June 17.
Glanz, James. 2004a. At the center of the storm over Bush and science. The New York Times, March 30.
Glanz, James. 2004b. Scientists say administration distorts facts. The New York Times, February 19.
Godin, Benoît. 2006. The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology & Human Values 31: 631–667. doi: 10.1177/0162243906291865 .
Golden, William. 1950a. Conversation with Dr. Lee A. DuBridge, president of California Tech, Dr. James R. Killian, Jr., president of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Irvin Stewart, president of the University of West Virginia. October 25. http://archives.aaas.org/golden/pdf/049_19501025.pdf .
Golden, William T. 1950b. Mobilizing science for war: The science advisor to the president, memorandum for the president. December 18. http://archives.aaas.org/golden/pdf/393_19501218.pdf .
Greenberg, Daniel. 2001. Science, money, and politics: Political triumph and ethical erosion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Greene, Benjamin. 2007. Eisenhower, science advice, and the nuclear test-ban debate, 1945–1963. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Grossberg, Israel. 1974. The special assistant to the president for science and technology, 1957–1968. Doctoral dissertation, New York University.
Guston, David. 2009. Science, politics, and two unicorns: An academic critique of science advice. In Presidential science advisors: Perspectives and reflections on science, policy and politics, eds. Pielke Jr., Roger, and Roberta, Klein (in press).
Hart, David. 1998. Forged consensus: Science, technology, and economic policy in the United States, 1921–1953. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kevles, Daniel. 1977. The National Science Foundation and the debate over postwar research policy, 1942–1945. Isis 68: 5–26. doi: 10.1086/351711 .
Killian, James. 1982. Sputnik, scientists, and Eisenhower: A memoir of the first special assistant to the president for science and technology. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 1994. Layers of interests, layers of influence: Business and the genesis of the National Science Foundation. Science, Technology & Human Values 19: 259–282. doi: 10.1177/016224399401900301 .
Kleinman, Daniel Lee. 1995. Politics on the endless frontier: Postwar research policy in the United States. Durham: Duke University Press.
Krige, John, and K. Kai-Henrik Barth. 2006. Introduction: Science, technology, and international affairs. In Global power knowledge. Science and technology in international affairs. Osiris, Second Series, vol. 21. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lamson, Robert. 1955. The present strains between science and government. Social Forces 33: 360–367. doi: 10.2307/2573008 .
Lawton, Fred. 1950. Letter to William T. Golden. September 19. http://archives.aaas.org/golden/pdf/405_19500919.pdf .
Leiserson, Avery. 1965. Scientists and the policy process. The American Political Science Review 59: 408–416. doi: 10.2307/1953058 .
Marburger, John. 2004. Statement of the honorable John H. Marburger, III on scientific integrity in the Bush administration April 2, 2004. http://www.ostp.gov/html/ucs/ResponsetoCongressonUCSDocumentApril2004.pdf .
Miller, Clark. 2006. An effective instrument of peace: Scientific cooperation as an instrument of U.S. foreign policy, 1938–1950. Global power knowledge. Science and technology in international affairs. Osiris, Second Series 21: 133–160.
Mooney, Chris. 2005. The republican war on science. New York: Basic Books.
Mullins, Nicholas. 1981. Power, social structure, and advice in American science: The United States national advisory system, 1950–1972. Science, Technology & Human Values 7: 4–19. doi: 10.1177/016224398100600402 .
Neumann, Frank, and Harry Keaton. 1953–1954. Congress and the faithful execution of laws. Should legislators supervise administrators? California Law Review 41: 565–595. doi: 10.2307/3478195 .
Pielke Jr., Roger. (ed.). 2004. Report on the misuse of science in the administrations of George H.W. Bush (1989–1993) and William J. Clinton (1993–2001). By the Students in ENVS 4800: Maymester, University of Colorado, June.
Pielke Jr., Roger, and Roberta, Klein (eds.). 2009. Presidential science advisors: Perspectives and reflections on science, policy and politics (in press).
Pielke, Roger. 2007. The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Press, Frank, and Philip M. Smith. 2009. Science and technology in the Carter Presidency. In Presidential science advisors: Perspectives and reflections on science, policy and politics, eds. Pielke Jr., Roger, and Roberta, Klein (in press).
Raloff, Janet. 1981. Mr. Keyworth goes to Washington. Science News 120: 45–46. doi: 10.2307/3966032 .
Rigden, John. 2007. Eisenhower, scientists, and sputnik. Physics Today (June): 49.
Sarewitz, Daniel. 2007. Does science policy matter? Issues in Science and Technology (Summer): 31–38.
Sherwood, Morgan. 1968. Federal policy for basic research: Presidential staff and the National Science Foundation 1950–1956. The Journal of American History 55: 599–615. doi: 10.2307/1891016 .
UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). 2004a. Scientific integrity in policy making: An investigation into the Bush administration’s misuse of science. Union of Concerned Scientists. March. http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/RSI_final_fullreport_1.pdf .
UCS (Union of Concerned Scientists). 2004b. Scientific integrity in policy making: Further investigation of the Bush administration’s misuse of science. Union of Concerned Scientists. July. http://www.ucsusa.org/assets/documents/scientific_integrity/Scientific_Integrity_in_Policy_Making_July_2004_1.pdf .
Waxman, Henry. 2003. Politics and science in the Bush administration. U.S. House of Representatives, Committee of Government Reform. Political Science (Wellington, N.Z.) (November): 13. http://democrats.reform.house.gov/features/politics_and_science/pdfs/pdf_politics_and_science_rep.pdf .
Wiesner, Jerome. 1963. The role of science in universities, government, and industry: Science and public policy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 50: 1201–1207. doi: 10.1073/pnas.50.6.1201 .
Woolley, John, and Gerhard Peters. 2007a. The American presidency project. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California (hosted), Gerhard Peters (database). http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=5968 . Accessed 10 August 2007.
Woolley, John, and Gerhard Peters. 2007b. The American presidency project. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California (hosted), Gerhard Peters (database). http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=30416 . Accessed 10 August 2007.
Yankelovich, Daniel. 2003. Winning greater influence for science. Issues in Science and Technology 19 (Summer).