The Revision Femur: A Potpourri of Options—Proximal Bone Loss: Distal Modular Fixation

Valle, 2003, Classification and an algorithmic approach to the reconstruction of femoral deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 85, 1, 10.2106/00004623-200300004-00001 Hamilton, 2007, Extensively porous-coated stems for femoral revision: A choice for all seasons, J Arthroplasty, 22, 106, 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.002 Weeden, 2002, Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 17, 134, 10.1054/arth.2002.32461 Bohm, 2001, Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83, 1023, 10.2106/00004623-200107000-00007 Bohm, 2004, The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery, Clin Orthop, 420, 148, 10.1097/00003086-200403000-00021 Gutierrez Del Alamo, 2007, Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: A 5-year to 12-year follow-up study, J Arthroplasty, 22, 515, 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.029 Lubinus, 2000, A modular option for proximal bone loss, Orthopedics, 23, 953, 10.3928/0147-7447-20000901-37 Sporer, 2004, Femoral fixation in the face of considerable bone loss: The use of modular stems, Clin Orthop, 429, 227, 10.1097/01.blo.0000150120.80409.0d Rodriguez, 2009, Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem, J Arthroplasty, 24, 751, 10.1016/j.arth.2008.09.011