The Resonance of Resonance: Critical Theory as a Sociology of World-Relations?
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adorno, T. W. (1973 [1966]). Negative dialectics. Trans. E. B. Ashton. London: Routledge.
Adorno, T. W. & Horkheimer, M. (1997 [1944/1969]). Dialectic of enlightenment. Trans. J. Cumming, London: Verso.
Allen, A., Forst, R., & Haugaard, M. (2014). Power and reason, justice and domination: A conversation. Journal of Political Power, 7(1), 7–33.
Bauman, Z. (1991). Modernity and ambivalence. Cambridge: Polity.
Bauman, Z., & Tester, K. (2007). On the postmodernism debate. In P. Goulimari (Ed.), Postmodernism. What moment? (pp. 22–31). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Beljan, J. (2017). Schule als Resonanzraum und Entfremdungszone. Eine neue Perspektive auf Bildung. Weinheim: Beltz.
Bloch, E. (1959). Das Prinzip Hoffnung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Boberski, H. (2004). Adieu, Spaßgesellschaft. Wollen wir uns zu Tode amüsieren? Eine Recherche. Wien/Klosterneuburg: Edition Va Bene.
Boltanski, L. (2008). Rendre la réalité inacceptable. À propos de “La production de l’idéologie dominante”. Paris: Demopolis.
Boltanski, L. (2011 [2009]). On critique. A sociology of emancipation. Trans. G. Elliott. Cambridge: Polity.
Boltanski, L., & Esquerre, A. (2017). Enrichissement. Une critique de la marchandise. Paris: Gallimard.
Boltanski, L., Rennes, J., & Susen, S. (2010). La fragilité de la réalité. Entretien avec Luc Boltanski. Propos recueillis par Juliette Rennes et Simon Susen. Mouvements, 64, 151–166.
Boltanski, L., Rennes, J., & Susen, S. (2014 [2010]). The fragility of reality: Luc Boltanski in conversation with Juliette Rennes and Simon Susen. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. Trans. S. Susen (pp. 591–610). London: Anthem Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). Language and symbolic power. Edited and introduced by John B. Thompson, translated by G. Raymond and M. Adamson. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P., & Boltanski, L. (2008 [1976]). La production de l’idéologie dominante. Paris: Demopolis/Raisons d'agir.
Breidbach, O., & Rosa, H. (Eds.). (2010). Laboratorium Aufklärung. München: Wilhelm Fink.
Coles, R., & Susen, S. (2018). The pragmatic vision of visionary pragmatism: The challenge of radical democracy in a neoliberal world order. Contemporary Political Theory, 17(2), 250–262.
Cusset, Y. (2003). Lutter pour la reconnaissance et/ou témoigner du différend. Le mépris, entre tort et reconnaissance. In E. Renault & Y. Sintomer (Eds.), Où en est la théorie critique ? (pp. 201–216). Paris: La Découverte.
Dörre, K., Lessenich, S., & Rosa, H. (2009). Soziologie-Kapitalismus-Kritik. Eine Debatte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Dörre, K., Lessenich, S., Rosa, H., Herrmann, J.-P., & Balhorn, L. (2015 [2010]). Sociology, capitalism, critique. Trans. J.-P Herrmann & Loren Balhorn. London: Verso.
Forst, R. (2012 [2007]). The right to justification. Elements of a constructivist theory of justice. Trans. J. Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press.
Forst, R. (2013 [2011]). Justification and critique. Towards a critical theory of politics. Trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Polity.
Forst, R. (2017). Noumenal alienation: Rousseau, Kant and Marx on the dialectics of self-determination. Kantian Review, 22(4), 523–551.
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. Trans. J. Golb, J. Ingram, & C. Wilke. London, Verso.
Grashoff, B. (2012). Entfremdung und Gattungswesen bei Marx (1843–1845). München: GRIN.
Grigull, S. (2014). Hartmut Rosa und Zygmunt Bauman im Vergleich. Zur Konzeptualisierung von Autonomie spätmoderner Subjekte. Münster: LIT.
Gunn, R. (1987). Ernst Bloch’s The Principle of Hope. Edinburgh Review, 76, 90–98.
Haber, S. (2013). Penser le néocapitalisme. Vie, capital et aliénation. Paris: Les Prairies Ordinaires.
Habermas, J. (1987a [1981]). The theory of communicative action. Volume 2: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Trans. T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (1987b [1981]). The theory of communicative action. Volume 1: Reason and the rationalization of society. Trans. T. McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (1988 [1963]). Dogmatism, reason, and decision: On theory and praxis in our scientific civilization. In J. Habermas, Theory and practice. Trans. J. Viertel (pp. 253–282). Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (1990 [1983]). Discourse ethics: Notes on a program of philosophical justification. In J. Habermas, Moral consciousness and communicative action. Trans. C. Lenhardt & S. Weber Nicholsen (pp. 43–115). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1996 [1992]). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge: Polity.
Habermas, J. (2001a). Kommunikatives Handeln und detranszendentalisierte Vernunft. Stuttgart: Reclam, Ditzingen.
Habermas, J. (2001b [1984]). Truth and society: The discursive redemption of factual claims to validity. In J. Habermas, On the pragmatics of social interaction: Preliminary studies in the theory of communicative action. Trans. B. Fultner, Cambridge: Polity, pp. 85–103.
Hammond, P. (2011). Simulation and dissimulation. Journal of War and Culture Studies, 3(3), 305–318.
Haugaard, M. (2018). Justification and the four dimensions of power. Journal of Political Power, 11(1), 93–114.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977 [1807]). Phenomenology of spirit. Trans. A. V. Miller, with analysis of the text and foreword by J. N. Findlay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Henning, C. (2015). Theorien der Entfremdung zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.
Honneth, A. (1991 [1986]). The critique of power. Reflective stages in a critical social theory. Trans. K. Baynes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Honneth, A. (Ed.). (1994). Pathologien des Sozialen. Die Aufgaben der Sozialphilosophie. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
Honneth, A. (1995 [1992]). The struggle for recognition. The moral grammar of social conflicts. Trans. J. Anderson. Cambridge: Polity.
Honneth, A. (2007a). Pathologien der Vernunft. Geschichte und Gegenwart der Kritischen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Honneth, A. (2007b). Recognition as ideology. In B. van den Brink & D. Owen (Eds.), Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory (pp. 323–347). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Iggers, G. G. (2005 [1997]). Historiography in the twentieth century: From scientific objectivity to the postmodern challenge. New Edition, Middletown, Con.: Wesleyan University Press.
Israel, J. (1972). Der Begriff der Entfremdung. Makrosoziologische Untersuchung von Marx bis zur Soziologie der Gegenwart. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.
Jacobsen, M. H., & Marshman, S. (2008). Bauman’s metaphors: The poetic imagination in sociology. Current Sociology, 56(5), 798–818.
Jaeggi, R. (2005). Entfremdung. Zur Aktualität eines sozialphilosophischen Problems. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Jaeggi, R. (2014). Kritik von Lebensformen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Jaeggi, R. (2018 [2014]). Critique of forms of life. Trans. C. Cronin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kellner, D. (2007). Reappraising the postmodern: Novelties, mapping and historical narratives. In P. Goulimari (Ed.), Postmodernism. What moment? (pp. 102–126). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Ketterer, H., & Becker, K. (Eds.). (2019). Was stimmt nicht mit der Demokratie? Eine Debatte zwischen Klaus Dörre, Nancy Fraser, Stephan Lessenich und Hartmut Rosa. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kläden, T., & Schüßler, M. (Eds.). (2017). Zu schnell für Gott? Theologische Kontroversen zu Beschleunigung und Resonanz. Verlag Herder: Freiburg im Breisgau.
Kodalle, K.-M., & Rosa, H. (Eds.). (2008). Rasender Stillstand. Beschleunigung des Wirklichkeitswandels: Konsequenzen und Grenzen. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Kögler, H.-H. (1997). Alienation as epistemological source: Reflexivity and social background after Mannheim and Bourdieu. Social Epistemology, 11(2), 141–164.
Kühnl, R. (1990 [1979]). Faschismustheorien. Ein Leitfaden. Aktualisierte Neuauflage. Heilbronn: Distel.
Kühnl, R. (1998 [1983]). Der Faschismus: Ursachen, Herrschaftsstruktur, Aktualität. Eine Einführung. 4., überarbeitete Auflage. Heilbronn: Distel.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984 [1979]). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi, foreword by F. Jameson. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Meijer, M. (2014). Strong evaluation and weak ontology. The predicament of Charles Taylor. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 75(5), 440–459.
Meijer, M. (2018). Charles Taylor’s doctrine of strong evaluation. Ethics and ontology in a scientific age. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Mulinari, D., & Sandell, K. (2009). A feminist re-reading of theories of late modernity: Beck, Giddens and the location of gender. Critical Sociology, 35(4), 493–508.
Pellizzoni, L. (2001). The myth of the best argument: Power, deliberation and reason. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(1), 59–86.
Peters, C. H., & Schulz, P. (Eds.). (2017). Resonanzen und Dissonanzen: Hartmut Rosas kritische Theorie in der Diskussion. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
Quicke, J. (1999). The postmodern turn: Problems and possibilities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(2), 281–284.
Rosa, H. (1998). Identität und kulturelle Praxis. Politische Philosophie nach Charles Taylor. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Rosa, H. (2005). Beschleunigung. Die Veränderung der Zeitstrukturen in der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2010). Alienation and acceleration. Towards a critical theory of late-modern temporality. Malmö: NSU Press.
Rosa, H. (2012). Weltbeziehungen im Zeitalter der Beschleunigung. Umrisse einer neuen Gesellschaftskritik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2013 [2010]). Beschleunigung und Entfremdung: Entwurf einer kritischen Theorie spätmoderner Zeitlichkeit. Trans. R. Celikates. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2015a). Die Vermessung des Glücks. Philosophie Magazin, 4, 18.
Rosa, H. (2015b [2005]). Social acceleration. A new theory of modernity. Trans. J. Trejo-Mathys. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rosa, H. (2016). Resonanz. Eine Soziologie der Weltbeziehung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Rosa, H. (2018 [2016]). Résonance. Une sociologie de la relation au monde. Traduit de l'allemand par S. Zilberfarb, avec la collaboration de S. Raquillet. Paris: La Découverte.
Rosa, H. (2019 [2016]). Resonance. A Sociology of Our Relationship to the World. Trans. J. Wagner, Cambridge: Polity.
Rosa, H., & Endres, W. (2016). Resonanzpädagogik. Wenn es im Klassenzimmer knistert. Weinheim: Beltz.
Rosa, H., & Henning, C. (Eds.). (2018). The good life beyond growth: New perspectives. London: Routledge.
Rosa, H., & Scheuerman, W. E. (Eds.). (2009). High-speed society: Social acceleration, power, and modernity. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Rosa, H., Meyn, K.-U., & Philipp, M. (Eds.). (2005). Bürgerbewusstsein und Demokratie in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Zum Zustand der politischen Kultur in den postsozialistischen Staaten. Jena: Glaux.
Rosa, H., Buhren, C. G., & Endres, W. (2016). Resonanzpädagogik & Schulleitung. Neue Impulse für die Schulentwicklung. Weinheim: Beltz.
Rosa, H., Gertenbach, L., Laux, H., & Strecker, D. (2018a [2010]). Theorien der Gemeinschaft zur Einführung. 2. vollständig überarbeitete Auflage. Hamburg: Junius.
Rosa, H., Strecker, D., & Kottmann, A. (2018b [2007/2013]). Soziologische Theorien. 3rd Edition. Konstanz: UVK.
Rosenfeld, M., & Arato, A. (Eds.). (1998). Habermas on law and democracy: Critical exchanges. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Saar, M. (2007). Genealogie als Kritik. Geschichte und Theorie des Subjekts nach Nietzsche und Foucault. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
Saar, M. (2013). Die Immanenz der Macht. Politische Theorie nach Spinoza. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Schacht, R. (1971 [1970]). Alienation. London: Allen and Unwin.
Schacht, R. (1994). The future of alienation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Schmitt, R. (2003). Alienation and freedom. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schmitt, R., & Moody, T. E. (Eds.). (1994). Alienation and social criticism. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press.
Smart, B. (1998). Facing modernity: Ambivalence, reflexivity and morality. London: SAGE.
Sörensen, P. (2016). Entfremdung als Schlüsselbegriff einer kritischen Theorie der Politik. Eine Systematisierung im Ausgang von Karl Marx, Hannah Arendt und Cornelius Castoriadis. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Susen, S. (2007). The foundations of the social: Between critical theory and reflexive sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.
Susen, S. (2008a). Poder y anti-poder (I-III). Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural, 10(1), 49–90.
Susen, S. (2008b). Poder y anti-poder (IV-V). Erasmus: Revista para el diálogo intercultural, 10(2), 133–180.
Susen, S. (2009). Between emancipation and domination: Habermasian reflections on the empowerment and disempowerment of the human subject. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 20, 80–110.
Susen, S. (2010a). Meadian reflections on the existential ambivalence of human selfhood. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 17, 62–81.
Susen, S. (2010b). Remarks on the concept of critique in Habermasian thought. Journal of Global Ethics, 6(2), 103–126.
Susen, S. (2012a). Une sociologie pragmatique de la critique est-elle possible? Quelques réflexions sur De la critique de Luc Boltanski. Revue Philosophique de Louvain, 110(4), 685–728.
Susen, S. (2012b). ‘Open Marxism’ against and beyond the ‘Great Enclosure’? Reflections on how (not) to crack capitalism. Journal of Classical Sociology, 12(2), 281–331.
Susen, S. (2013a). Bourdieusian reflections on language: Unavoidable conditions of the real speech situation. Social Epistemology, 27(3–4), 199–246.
Susen, S. (2013b). A reply to my critics: The critical spirit of Bourdieusian language. Social Epistemology, 27(3–4), 323–393.
Susen, S. (2014a [2012]). Is there such a thing as a ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’? Reflections on Luc Boltanski’s On critique. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘pragmatic sociology of critique’. Trans. S. Susen (pp. 173–210). London: Anthem Press.
Susen, S. (2014b). Reflections on ideology: Lessons from Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski. Thesis Eleven, 124(1), 90–113.
Susen, S. (2015a). The ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Susen, S. (2015b). Emancipation. In M. T. Gibbons, D. Coole, E. Ellis, & K. Ferguson (Eds.), The encyclopedia of political thought (Vol. 3, pp. 1024–1038). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Susen, S. (2016a). Further reflections on the ‘postmodern turn’ in the social sciences: A reply to William Outhwaite. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 29(4), 429–438.
Susen, S. (2016b). Scattered remarks on the concept of engagement: A socio-philosophical approach. Philosophy and Society, 27(2), 459–463.
Susen, S. (2016c). Towards a critical sociology of dominant ideologies: An unexpected reunion between Pierre Bourdieu and Luc Boltanski. Cultural Sociology, 10(2), 195–246.
Susen, S. (2017a). Hermeneutic Bourdieu. In L. Adkins, C. Brosnan, & S. Threadgold (Eds.), Bourdieusian prospects (pp. 132–159). London: Routledge.
Susen, S. (2017b). Between crisis and critique: The fragile foundations of social life à la Rodrigo Cordero. Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, 18(1), 95–124.
Susen, S. (2017c). Following the footprints of the ‘postmodern turn’: A reply to Gregor McLennan. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4(1), 104–123.
Susen, S. (2017d). Remarks on the nature of justification: A socio-pragmatic perspective. In C. Cloutier, J.-P. Gond, & B. Leca (Eds.), Justification, evaluation and critique in the study of organizations: Contributions from French Pragmatist Sociology. Book series: Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 52, pp. 349–381). Bingley: Emerald.
Susen, S. (2017e). Reflections on Patrick Baert’s The existentialist moment: The rise of Sartre as a public intellectual. In S. Susen & P. Baert, The sociology of intellectuals: After ‘The existentialist moment’ (pp. 1–122). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Susen, S. (2018a). The economy of enrichment: Towards a new form of capitalism? Berlin Journal of Critical Theory, 2(2), 5–98.
Susen, S. (2018b). The seductive force of ‘noumenal power’: A new path (or impasse) for critical theory? Journal of Political Power, 11(1), 4–45.
Susen, S. (2018c). Jürgen Habermas: Between democratic deliberation and deliberative democracy. In R. Wodak & B. Forchtner (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and politics (pp. 43–66). London: Routledge.
Taylor, C. (1976). Responsibility for self. In A. O. Rorty (Ed.), The identities of persons (pp. 281–299). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Taylor, C. (1985a). What is human agency? In C. Taylor, Human agency and language: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 15–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1985b). Self-interpreting animals. In C. Taylor, Human agency and language: Philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 45–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1985c). What’s wrong with negative liberty. In C. Taylor, Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers (Vol. 2, pp. 211–229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1995). Explanation and practical reason. In C. Taylor, Philosophical arguments (pp. 34–60). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (2011). Disenchantment-reenchantment. In C. Taylor, Dilemmas and connections: Selected essays (pp. 287–302). Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
van den Brink, B., & Owen, D. (Eds.). (2007). Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voirol, O. (2003). L’espace public et les luttes pour la reconnaissance. De Habermas à Honneth. In C. Barril, M. Carrel, J.-C. Guerrero, & A. Márquez (Eds.), Le public en action. Usages et limites de la notion d'espace public en sciences sociales (pp. 117–137). Paris: L’Harmattan.
Wils, J.-P. (Ed.). (2018). Resonanz. Im interdisziplinären Gespräch mit Hartmut Rosa. Baden-Baden: Nomos.