The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams

Group Decision and Negotiation - Tập 30 Số 4 - Trang 945-982 - 2021
Atif Açıkgöz1, Irem Demirkan2, Gary P. Latham3, Cemil Kuzey4
1Department of Management, Vistula University, 3 Stoklosy Str., 02-787, Warsaw, Poland
2Sellinger School of Business, Loyola University Maryland, Baltimore, USA
3Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
4Computer Science/Information Systems, Murray State University, Murray, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractPrevious research has suggested that unlearning is not linked to performance improvements in a team setting. Further, unlearning may have deleterious effects on performance outcomes because when it happens, teams are likely to lose the way they perform tasks and the reasons for their operational existence. In contrast, this study predicts that teams can conduct exploitative and exploratory activities in a balanced manner predicated on unlearning practices to improve new product development (NPD) performance. We hypothesized that while unlearning allows NPD teams to balance exploitative and exploratory learning activities, simultaneous yet balanced exploitation and exploration at high levels, namely innovation ambidexterity, links unlearning practices to NPD performance. This occurs by providing task-relevant knowledge for the replacement of outdated routines and beliefs during NPD processes. Data were collected from 198 NPD teams (i.e., 464 individual participants). The examination of ordinary least squares regression-based path analyses revealed that innovation ambidexterity mediates the relationship of unlearning with NPD performance, operationalized as product development speed, cost, and product success. Overall, this study shows that the unlearning-performance relationship occurs through simultaneous exploitative and exploratory learning activities in a balanced manner.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Açıkgöz A, Latham GP, Acikgoz F (2020) Mediation of scenario planning on the reflection-performance relationship in new product development teams. J Bus Ind Market 35:256–268

Ali A, Krapfel R Jr, LaBahn D (1995) Product innovativeness and entry strategy: impact on cycle time break-even time. J Prod Innov Manag 12:54–69

Argyris C, Schön DA (1974) Theory in practice: increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey-Bass

Argyris C (2004) Reasons and rationalizations: the limits to organizational knowledge. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Akgün AE, Lynn GS, Byrne JC (2006) Antecedents and consequences of unlearning in new product development teams. J Prod Innov Manag 23:73–88

Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103:411–423

Atuahene-Gima K (2003) The effects of centrifugal and centripetal forces on product development speed and quality: how does problem solving matter? Acad Manag J 46:359–373

Bagozzi R, Yi Y, Phillips LW (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q 36:421–458

Baker WE, Sinkula JM (1999) The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J Acad Mark Sci 27:411–427

Becker K (2019) Organizational unlearning: the challenges of a developing phenomenon. Learn Organ 26:534–541

Bicchi A (2000) Hands for dextrous manipulation and robust grasping: a difficult road towards simplicity. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 16:652–662

Bliese PD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation. In: Klein KJ, Kozlowski SWJ (eds) Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 349–381

Brislin RW (1986) The wording and translation of research instruments. In: Lonner WJ, Berry JW (eds) Field methods in cross-cultural research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 137–164

Brix J (2019) Ambidexterity and organizational learning: revisiting and reconnecting the literatures. Learn Organ 26:337–351

Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organ Sci 2:40–57

Cao Q, Gedajlovic E, Zhang H (2009) Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organ Sci 20:781–796

Cegarra-Navarro J, Wensley A (2019) Promoting intentional unlearning through an unlearning cycle. J Organ Chang Manag 32:67–79

Chandrasekaran A, Linderman K, Schroeder R (2012) Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations. J Oper Manag 30:134–151

Chen J, Damanpour F, Reilly RR (2010) Understanding antecedents of new product development speed: a meta-analysis. J Oper Manag 28:17–33

Cool K, Dierickx I, Almeida CL (2016) Diseconomies of time compression. In: Augier M, Teece DJ (eds) The Palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management. Palgrave Macmillan, London

Cooper RG, Kleinschmidt EJ (1987) Success factors in product innovation. Ind Mark Manag 16:215–223

Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE (1999) An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev 24:522–537

Daft RL (1982) Bureaucratic vs. nonbureaucratic structure and the process of innovation and change. In: Bacharach S (ed) Research in the sociology of organizations, vol 1. JAI, Greenwich, pp 129–166

Dickson PR (1992) Toward a general theory of competitive rationality. J Mark 56:69–83

Edmondson AC (2002) The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: a group-level perspective. Organ Sci 13:128–146

Edmondson AC, Dillon JR, Roloff KS (2007) Three perspectives on team learning. Acad Manag Ann 1:269–314

Eisenhardt KM, Tabrizi BN (1995) Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry. Adm Sci Q 40:84–110

Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J 21:1105–1121

Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–51

Gibson CB, Birkinshaw J (2004) The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad Manag J 47:209–226

Gisi U (1996) Synergistic interaction of fungicides in mixtures. Symposium: synergism, antagonism, and additive of fungicides in mixtures. Phytopathology 86:1273–1279

Glick WH (1985) Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: pitfalls in multilevel research. Acad Manag Rev 10:601–616

Gorsuch RL (1983) Factor analysis, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale

Grisold T, Kaiser A, Hafner J (2017) Unlearning before creating new knowledge: a cognitive process. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 4614–4623

Gupta AK, Souder WE (1998) Key drivers of reduced cycle time. Res Technol Manag 41:38–43

Gupta AK, Smith KG, Shalley CE (2006) The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Acad Manag J 49:693–706

Ha AY, Porteus EL (1995) Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Manag Sci 41:1431–1447

Hair G, Black B, Babin B, Anderson R, Tatham R (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Pearson, Upper Saddle River

Harman HH (1960) Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS® system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, Cary

Hauptman O, Hirji KK (1996) The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: an empirical study of cross-functional teams. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 43:153–164

Hayes AF (2017) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford Publications, New York

He ZL, Wong PK (2004) Exploration vs. exploitation: an empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ Sci 15:481–494

Hedberg B (1981) How organizations learn and unlearn. In: Nystrom P, Starbuck WH (eds) Handbook of organizational design. Cambridge University Press, London, pp 1–27

Hoppmann J, Rebentisch E, Dombrowski U, Zahn T (2011) A framework for organizing lean product development. Eng Manag J 23:3–15

Horwitz SK, Horwitz IB (2007) The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: a meta-analytic review of team demography. J Manag 33:987–1015

James LR (1982) Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. J Appl Psychol 67:219–229

James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1984) Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J Appl Psychol 69:85–98

James LR, Demaree RG, Wolf G (1993) rwg: an assessment of within group inter-rater agreement. J Appl Psychol 78:306–339

Jansen JJP, van den Bosch FAJ, Volberda HW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manag Sci 52:1661–1674

Jansen JJP, Kostopoulos KC, Mihalache OR, Papalexandris A (2016) A socio-psychological perspective on team ambidexterity: the contingency role of supportive leadership behaviours. J Manag Stud 53:939–965

Jayaram J, Malhotra MK (2010) The differential and contingent impact of concurrency on new product development project performance: a holistic examination. Decis Sci 41:147–196

Katila R, Ahuja G (2002) Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Acad Manag J 45:1183–1194

Kessler EH (2000) Tightening the belt: methods for reducing development costs associated with new product innovation. J Eng Tech Manag 17:59–92

Klammer A, Gueldenberg S (2019) Unlearning and forgetting in organizations: a systematic review of literature. J Knowl Manag 23:860–888

Kline RB (2016) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. The Guilford Press, New York

Kock N (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int J e-Collab 11:1–10

Kostopoulos KC, Bozionelos N, Syrigos E (2015) Ambidexterity and unit performance: intellectual capital antecedents and cross-level moderating effects of human resource practices. Hum Resour Manag 54:S111–S132

Kozlowski WJ, Hattrup K (1992) A disagreement about within group agreement: disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. J Appl Psychol 77:161–167

Kumar N, Stern LW, Anderson JC (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad Manag J 36:1633–1651

Lee LTS, Sukoco BM (2011) Reflexivity, stress, and unlearning in the new product development team: the moderating effect of procedural justice. R&D Manag 41:410–423

Levinthal DA, March JG (1993) The myopia of learning. Strateg Manag J 14:95–112

Lewis MW, Welsh MA, Dehler GE, Green SG (2002) Product development tensions: exploring contrasting styles of project management. Acad Manag J 45:546–564

Li C-R (2013) Disentangling the effect of exploratory learning and exploitative learning in product innovation process. Can J Adm Sci 30:101–114

Lin HE, McDonough EF III (2014) Cognitive frames, learning mechanisms, and innovation ambidexterity. J Prod Innov Manag 31:170–188

Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol 86:114–121

March JG (1988) The pursuit of organizational intelligence. Blackwell Business, Malden

March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2:71–87

Marks MA, Mathieu JE, Zaccaro SJ (2001) A conceptual framework and taxonomy of team processes. Acad Manag Rev 26:356–376

McDonough EF III (1993) Faster new product development: investigating the effects of technology and characteristics of the project leader and team. J Prod Innov Manag 10:241–250

Merchant B (2017) The secret origin story of the iPhone. Retrieved from https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/13/15782200/one-device-secret-history-iphone-brian-merchant-book-excerpt

Meyers PW, Wilemon D (1989) Learning in new technology development teams. J Prod Innov Manag 6:79–88

Miller D (1981) Toward a new contingency approach: the search for organizational gestalts. J Manage Stud 18:1–26

Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Nilsson A (2010) Balancing the management control package of small, rapidly growing firms in turbulent environments. Int J Entrep Small Bus 11:3–24

Nosella A, Cantarello S, Filippini R (2012) The intellectual structure of organizational ambidexterity: a bibliographic investigation into the state of the art. Strateg Organ 10:450–465

Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH (1984) To avoid organizational crises, unlearn. Organ Dyn 12:53–65

O’Reilly CA III, Tushman ML (2007) Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: resolving the innovator’s dilemma. Res Organ Behav 28:185–206

O’Reilly CA III, Tushman ML (2013) Organizational ambidexterity: past, present, and future. Acad Manag Perspect 27:324–338

Osborn CS (1998) Systems for sustainable organizations: emergent strategies, interactive controls and semi-formal information. J Manag Stud 35:481–510

Peschl MF (2019) Unlearning towards an uncertain future: on the back end of future-driven unlearning. Learn Organ 26:454–469

Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903

Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harv Bus Rev 68:79–91

Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42:185–227

Raghavan P (2007) The nature of hand motor impairment after stroke and its treatment. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 9:221–228

Ruíz MDA, Gutiérrez JO, Martínez-Caro E, Cegarra-Navarro JG (2017) Linking an unlearning context with firm performance through human capital. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ 23:16–22

Rupcic N (2019) Learning-forgetting-unlearning-relearning—the learning organization’s learning dynamics. Learn Organ 26:542–548

Schumpeter JA (1934) The theory of economic development: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest and the business cycle. Translated from the German by Opie R (2008). New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers

Shea K, Cagan J (1999) The design of novel roof trusses with shape annealing: assessing the ability of a computational method in aiding structural designers with varying design intent. Des Stud 20:3–23

Sher PJ, Yang PY (2005) The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Technovation 25:33–43

Simsek Z (2009) Organizational ambidexterity: towards a multilevel understanding. J Manag Stud 46:597–624

Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1997) A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Manag Sci 43:1104–1120

Suhr DD (2006) Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

Sutcliffe KM, Sitkin SB, Browning LD (2000) Tailoring process management to situational requirements: beyond the control and exploration dichotomy. In: Cole R, Scott WR (eds) The quality movement and organization theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 315–330

Swink ML, Sandvig JC, Mabert VA (1996) Customizing concurrent engineering processes: five case studies. J Prod Innov Manag 13:229–244

Tatikonda MV, Montoya-Weiss MM (2001) Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: the influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Manag Sci 47:151–172

Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K (2000) The psychology of survey response. Cambridge University Press

Trombly CA, Scott AD (1989) Evaluation of motor control. In: Tromobly CA (eds) Occupational therapy for physical disfunction, 3rd edn. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore

Tsang EWK, Zahra SA (2008) Organizational unlearning. Hum Relat 61:1435–1462

Tushman ML, O’Reilly C (1996) Ambidextrous organization: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif Manag Rev 38:8–30

Úbeda-García M, Claver-Cortés E, Marco-Lajara B, Zaragoza-Sáez P (2020) Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations. J Bus Res

Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manag Rev 14(3):423–444

Venugopal A, Krishnan TN, Upadhyayula RS, Kumar N (2020) Finding the microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity - Demystifying the role of top management behavioural integration. J Bus Res 106:1–11

Vince R (2008) Learning-in-action and learning inaction: advancing the theory and practice of critical action learning. Act Learn Res Pract 5:93–104

Wenngren J, Ericson A, Parida P (2016) Improving team activities in the concept development stages: addressing radical development and open-ended problems. J Promot Manag 22:496–510

Wong PSP, Cheung SO, Yiu RLY, Hardie M (2012) The unlearning dimension of organizational learning in construction projects. Int J Project Manag 30:94–104

Yang KP, Chou C, Chiu YC (2014) How unlearning affects radical innovation: the dynamics of social capital and slack resources. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 87:152–163

Zhou KZ, Wu F (2010) Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation. Strateg Manag J 31:547–561

Zhou J, Yi J, Chen X, Liu Z, Wang Z (2018) BCL-13: A 13-DOF soft robotic hand for dexterous grasping and in-hand manipulation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 3:3379–3386