The Question of Questions: What is a Gene? Comments on Rolston and Griffths & Stotz
Tóm tắt
If the question “What is a gene?” proves to be worth asking it must be able to elicit an answer which both recognizes and address the reasons why the concept of the gene ever seemed to be something worth getting excited about in the first place as well analyzing and evaluating the latest develops in the molecular biology of DNA. Each of the preceding papers fails to do one of these and sufferrs the consequences. Where Rolston responds to the apparent failure of molecular biology to make good on the desideratum of the classical gene by veering off into fanciful talk about “cybernetic genes,” Griffiths and Stotz lose themselves in the molecular fine print and forget to ask themselves why “genes” should be of any special interst anyway.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Amundson R. (2005) The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Darwin C. (1998) The Descent of man. Prometheus Books, Amherst
Kant I. Critique of Judgment. Translated by W.S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co., 1987
Kirschner M., Gerhart J. (2005) The Plausibility of Life: Resolving Darwin’s Dilemma. Yale University Press, New Haven
Moss L. (2003) What Genes Can’t Do. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Nordenskiöld E. (1928) The History of Biology. Tudor Publishing Co., New York
Ospovat D. (1981) The Development of Darwin’s Theory: Natural History, Natural Theology, and Natural Selection, 1838–1859. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pinto-Correia C. (1997) The Ovary of Eye. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Shapiro, J. “Bacteria are Small but not Stupid: Cognition, Natural Genetic Engineering, and Sociobacteriology.” In Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences. (In Press)
Roe S.A. (1981) Matter, Life, and Generation: 18th century Embryology and the Haller-Wolff Debate. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
West-Eberhard M.J. (2003) Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford