The QUICK scheme is a third‐order finite‐volume scheme with point‐valued numerical solutions
Tóm tắt
In this paper, we resolve the ever‐present confusion over the Quadratic Upwind Interpolation for Convective Kinematics (QUICK) scheme: it is a second‐order scheme or a third‐order scheme. The QUICK scheme, as proposed in the original reference (B. P. Leonard, Comput. Methods. Appl. Mech. Eng., 19, (1979), 59‐98), is a third‐order (not second‐order) finite‐volume scheme for the integral form of a general nonlinear conservation law with point‐valued solutions stored at cell centers as numerical solutions. Third‐order accuracy is proved by a careful and detailed truncation error analysis and demonstrated by a series of thorough numerical tests. The QUICK scheme requires a careful spatial discretization of a time derivative to preserve third‐order accuracy for unsteady problems. Two techniques are discussed, including the QUICKEST scheme of Leonard. Discussions are given on how the QUICK scheme is mistakenly found to be second‐order accurate. This paper is intended to serve as a reference to clarify any confusion about third‐order accuracy of the QUICK scheme and also as the basis for clarifying economical high‐order unstructured‐grid schemes as we will discuss in a subsequent paper.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Nishikawa Hiroaki, 2020, A truncation error analysis of third‐order MUSCL scheme for nonlinear conservation laws, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
BurgC. O. E. Higher order variable extrapolation for unstructured finite volume RANS flow solvers. AIAA Paper 2005‐4999;2005.
Van Leer B, 1985, Upwind‐difference methods for aerodynamic problems governed by the Euler equations, Fluid Mech Lect Appl Math, 22, 327
YeeH. C. On the implementation of a class of upwind schemes for system of hyperbolic ConselVation laws. NASA TM‐86839;1985.
Versteeg HK, 1995, An Introduction to Computational Computational Fluid Dynamics
Roache PJ, 1998, Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics
Song B, 2011, Computational Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer: Emerging Topics, 3
Sengupta TK, 2004, Fundamentals of Computational Fluid Dynamics
Jing H, 2006, A hybrid five‐point finite difference scheme for convection‐diffusion equations, Proc ECCOMAS CFD, 2006
Hirsch C, 2007, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows
Wesseling P, 2000, Principles of Computational Fluid Dynamics
Aprovitola A, 2015, SParC‐LES: enabling large eddy simulations with parallel sparse matrix computation tools, Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 70, 2688
EymannT.A RoeP.L. Active flux schemes for systems. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the 20th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference AIAA Paper 2011‐3840;2011; Hawaii.
Nishikawa H. Beyond interface gradient: a general principle for constructing diffusion schemes. Paper presented at: Proceedings of the of 40th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit AIAA Paper 2010‐5093;2010; Chicago.
vanLeerB Private Communication May;2020.
Zienkiewicz OC, 1994, The Finite Element Method, Volume 1
DiskinB.ThomasJ.L. Accuracy analysis for mixed‐element finite‐volume discretization schemes. NIA Report No 2007‐08;2007.
Nishikawa H. A face‐averaged nodal gradient cell‐centered finite‐volume method for mixed grids. AIAA aviation 2020 forum AIAA Paper 2020‐3049;2020.
Nishikawa H, 2004, Equations Computational Fluid Dynamics 2004, 799