The Psychological Distance of Climate Change

Risk Analysis - Tập 32 Số 6 - Trang 957-972 - 2012
Alexa Spence1, Wouter Poortinga2, Nick Pidgeon3
1Horizon Digital Economy Research/School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
2Welsh School of Architecture/School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
3Understanding Risk Research Group, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK

Tóm tắt

Avoiding dangerous climate change is one of the most urgent social risk issues we face today and understanding related public perceptions is critical to engaging the public with the major societal transformations required to combat climate change. Analyses of public perceptions have indicated that climate change is perceived as distant on a number of different dimensions. However, to date there has been no in‐depth exploration of the psychological distance of climate change. This study uses a nationally representative British sample in order to systematically explore and characterize each of the four theorized dimensions of psychological distance—temporal, social, and geographical distance, and uncertainty—in relation to climate change. We examine how each of these different aspects of psychological distance relate to each other as well as to concerns about climate change and sustainable behavior intentions. Results indicate that climate change is both psychologically distant and proximal in relation to different dimensions. Lower psychological distance was generally associated with higher levels of concern, although perceived impacts on developing countries, as an indicator of social distance, was also significantly related to preparedness to act on climate change. Our findings clearly point to the utility of risk communication techniques designed to reduce psychological distance. However, highlighting the potentially very serious distant impacts of climate change may also be useful in promoting sustainable behavior, even among those already concerned.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Brechin SR, 2010, The Routledge Handbook of Climate Change and Society

10.1080/00139150903337217

American Psychological Association.Psychology and Global Climate Change. APA 2010.

10.1126/science.1161958

Milfont TL, 2010, Psychological Approaches to Sustainability: Current Trends in Theory, Research and Practice

10.1038/36975

10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z

10.1038/nclimate1059

2006, Attitudes to Climate Change—Wave 3

PoortingaW PidgeonNF LorenzoniI.Public Perceptions of Nuclear Power Climate Change and Energy Options in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted During October and November 2005. Technical Report(Understanding Risk Working Paper 06–02). Norwich :Centre for Environmental Risk 2006.

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005

LeiserowitzA MaibachE Roser‐RenoufC SmithN.Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in January 2010. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven CT : Yale Project on Climate Change Communication 2010.

Department for Transport. Public Attitudes Towards Climate Change and the Impact of Transport: 2006 2007 2008 and 2009 (January 2010 report) 2010. Available at:http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/trsnstatsatt/climatechngeandtranport1 Accessed on 13th May 2010.

2009, Europeans attitudes towards climate change (Special Eurobarometer 332)

BBC News.UN body wants probe of climate e‐mail row 2009. Available at:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8394483.stm Accessed on 12th May 2010.

BBC News.Himalayan glaciers melting deadline “a mistake ” 2009. Available at:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/8387737.stm. Accessed on 12th May 2010.

EDF/YouGov.YouGov/EDF energy survey results 2010. Available at:http://www.today.yougov.co.uk/sites/today.yougov.co.uk/files/YG‐Archives‐Pol‐EDF‐energy‐130510.pdf. Accessed on 4th June 2010.

2007, Energy Saving Trust. Green barometer: Measuring environmental attitudes

10.3354/cr011075

10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610

10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.177

10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.641

10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578

10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.009

Liberman MD, 2002, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 199

10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705

Locke EA, 1990, A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance

10.1016/0749-5978(89)90053-8

10.1037/0022-0663.71.3.310

10.1037/h0024566

10.1016/0030-5073(70)90042-5

Wood R, 1990, Research in Organizational Behaviour, 73

10.1080/14792779343000059

10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.004

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002

Confalonieri UB, Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007.

10.1080/00139157.1993.9929122

10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001

10.1006/jevp.2000.0175

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.05.001

10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004

10.1037/0096-3445.131.3.364

10.1037/h0076860

Loewenstein G, 1992, Choice Over Time

10.1002/wcc.41

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.x

10.1348/014466608X401875

10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.001

Social MORI., 2007, Marketing and Climate Change: Tipping Point or Turning point?

LangerG.ABC News/Planet Green/Stanford Poll: Environment/Energy 2008. Available athttp://woods.stanford.edu/research/surveys.html Accessed 4 November 2009.

10.1016/j.crte.2004.10.004

10.2307/1914185

10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00061-3

10.1177/0146167205284006

SpenceA VenablesD PidgeonN PoortingaW DemskiC.Public Perceptions of Climate Change and Energy Futures in Britain: Summary Findings of a Survey Conducted in January–March 2010. Technical Report(Understanding Risk Working Paper 10–01). Cardiff :School of Psychology 2010.

10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00092.x

10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

PreacherKJ HayesAF.SPSS macro for multiple mediation 2008. Available athttp://www.comm.ohio‐state.edu/ahayes Accessed on 3 March 2010.

10.1037/a0023253

10.1038/nclimate1080

10.1080/09644010903156976

DEFRA., 2009, Adapting to Climate Change: UK Climate Projections

10.1007/s10584-010-9938-y