The Place of FDG PET/CT in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Value and Limitations

Yiyan Liu1
1Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Fletcher, 2008, Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology, J Nucl Med, 49, 480, 10.2967/jnumed.107.047787

Rohren, 2004, Clinical applications of PET in oncology, Radiology, 231, 302, 10.1148/radiol.2312021185

Kapoor, 2004, An introduction to PET-CT imaging, Radiographics, 24, 523, 10.1148/rg.242025724

Antoch, 2004, Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET, J Clin Oncol, 22, 4357, 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.120

Pelosi, 2004, Value of integrated PET/CT for lesion localization in cancer patients: a comparative study, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 31, 932, 10.1007/s00259-004-1483-3

Reinartz, 2004, Side-by-side reading of PET and CT scans in oncology: which patients might profit from integrated PET/CT?, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 31, 1456, 10.1007/s00259-004-1593-y

Delbeke, 2001, Positron emission tomography imaging in oncology, Radiol Clin North Am, 39, 883, 10.1016/S0033-8389(05)70319-5

Liu, 2010, Physiology and pathophysiology of incidental findings detected on FDG-PET scintigraphy, Semin Nucl Med, 40, 294, 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2010.02.002

Wang, 2012, Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of [18F] FDG-PET and PET/CT in renal cell carcinoma, Cancer Imaging, 12, 464, 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0042

Kamel, 2006, Forced diuresis improves the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in abdominopelvic malignancies, J Nucl Med, 47, 1803

Miyakita, 2002, Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) for detection of renal cell carcinoma and immunohistochemical glucose transporter 1 (GLUT-1) expression in the cancer, Int J Urol, 9, 15, 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2002.00416.x

Aide, 2003, Efficiency of [(18)F]FDG PET in characterizing renal cancer and detecting distant metastases: a comparison with CT, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 30, 1236, 10.1007/s00259-003-1211-4

Kang, 2004, Clinical use of fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 positron emission tomography for detection of renal cell carcinoma, J Urol, 171, 1806, 10.1097/01.ju.0000120241.50061.e4

Ozulker, 2011, A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the evaluation of indeterminate renal masses, Nucl Med Commun, 32, 265, 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283442e3b

Kumar, 2005, 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-glucose-positron emission tomography in characterization of solid renal masses, Mol Imaging Biol, 7, 431, 10.1007/s11307-005-0026-z

Nakhoda, 2013, Assessment of the diagnostic performance of (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for detection and characterization of solid renal malignancies, Hell J Nucl Med, 16, 19, 10.1967/s002449910067

Takahashi, 2015, Preoperative evaluation of renal cell carcinoma by using 18F-FDG PET/CT, Clin Nucl Med, 40, 936, 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000875

Namura, 2010, Impact of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) evaluated by 18-Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) on survival for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a preliminary report, BMC Cancer, 10, 667, 10.1186/1471-2407-10-667

Ferda, 2013, 18F-FDG-PET/CT in potentially advanced renal cell carcinoma: a role in treatment decisions and prognosis estimation, Anticancer Res, 33, 2665

Lee, 2014, Can initial (18)F-FDG PET-CT imaging give information on metastasis in patients with primary renal cell carcinoma?, Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 48, 144, 10.1007/s13139-013-0245-1

Figlin, 1999, Renal cell carcinoma: management of advanced disease, J Urol, 161, 381, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)61897-4

Majhail, 2003, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the evaluation of distant metastases from renal cell carcinoma, J Clin Oncol, 21, 3995, 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.073

Nakatani, 2011, The potential clinical value of FDG-PET for recurrent renal cell carcinoma, Eur J Radiol, 79, 29, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.11.019

Kumar, 2010, Role of FDG PET-CT in recurrent renal cell carcinoma, Nucl Med Commun, 31, 844, 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32833d6882

Bertagna, 2013, Role of F18-FDG-PET/CT in restaging patients affected by renal carcinoma, Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur, 16, 3, 10.5603/NMR.2013.0002

Fuccio, 2014, Restaging clear cell renal carcinoma with 18F-FDG PET/CT, Clin Nucl Med, 39, e320, 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000382

Win, 2015, Clinical effectiveness of (18)f-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in management of renal cell carcinoma: a single institution experience, World J Nucl Med, 14, 36, 10.4103/1450-1147.150535

Alongi, 2016, Recurrent renal cell carcinoma: clinical and prognostic value of FDG PET/CT, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 43, 464, 10.1007/s00259-015-3159-6

Sharma, 2012, Imaging thrombus in cancer patients with FDG PET-CT, Jpn J Radiol, 30, 95, 10.1007/s11604-011-0016-9

Sharma, 2011, 18F-FDG PET-CT in the diagnosis of tumor thrombus: can it be differentiated from benign thrombus?, Nucl Med Commun, 32, 782, 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32834774c8

Ravina, 2014, Tumor thrombus: ancillary findings on FDG PET/CT in an oncologic population, Clin Nucl Med, 39, 767, 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000451

Wu, 2002, Comparing whole body 18F-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methylene diphosphate bone scan to detect bone metastases in patients with renal cell carcinomas – a preliminary report, J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 128, 503, 10.1007/s00432-002-0370-1

Rodriguez Martinez de Llano, 2010, Clinical impact of (18)F-FDG PET in management of patients with renal cell carcinoma, Rev Esp Med Nucl, 29, 12, 10.1016/j.remn.2009.11.008

Park, 2009, Significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography for the postoperative surveillance of advanced renal cell carcinoma, BJU Int, 103, 615, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08150.x

Jonasch, 2010, Upfront, randomized, phase 2 trial of sorafenib versus sorafenib and low-dose interferon alfa in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: clinical and biomarker analysis, Cancer, 116, 57, 10.1002/cncr.24685

Procopio, 2011, Sorafenib with interleukin-2 vs sorafenib alone in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the ROSORC trial, Br J Cancer, 104, 1256, 10.1038/bjc.2011.103

Chen, 2013, FDG-PET as a predictive biomarker for therapy with everolimus in metastatic renal cell cancer, Cancer Med, 2, 545, 10.1002/cam4.102

Caldarella, 2014, The role of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating the response to tyrosine-kinase inhibitors in patients with metastatic primary renal cell carcinoma, Radiol Oncol, 48, 219, 10.2478/raon-2013-0067

Kayani, 2011, Sequential FDG-PET/CT as a biomarker of response to Sunitinib in metastatic clear cell renal cancer, Clin Cancer Res, 17, 6021, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-3309

Lyrdal, 2009, Evaluation of sorafenib treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma with 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography, Nucl Med Commun, 30, 519, 10.1097/MNM.0b013e32832cc220

Kakizoe, 2014, The early response of renal cell carcinoma to tyrosine kinase inhibitors evaluated by FDG PET/CT was not influenced by metastatic organ, BMC Cancer, 14, 390, 10.1186/1471-2407-14-390

Ljungberg, 2007, Renal cell carcinoma guideline, Eur Urol, 51, 1502, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.03.035

Boellaard, 2015, FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 42, 328, 10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x

Escudier, 2014, Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Ann Oncol, 25, iii49, 10.1093/annonc/mdu259

Bouchelouche, 2015, PET/computed tomography in renal, bladder, and testicular cancer, PET Clin, 10, 361, 10.1016/j.cpet.2015.03.002