The Performance of Administrative and Self‐Reported Measures for Risk Adjustment of Veterans Affairs Expenditures

Health Services Research - Tập 40 Số 3 - Trang 887-904 - 2005
Matthew L. Maciejewski1, Chuan‐Fen Liu2, Ann Derleth3, Mary B. McDonell3, Steven W. Anderson3, Stephan D. Fihn4
1Health Services Research and Development Northwest Center of Excellence, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
2Department of Health Services
3VA Puget Sound Health Care System
4University of Washington

Tóm tắt

Objective. To evaluate the performance of different prospective risk adjustment models of outpatient, inpatient, and total expenditures of veterans who regularly use Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care.Data Sources. We utilized administrative, survey and expenditure data on 14,449 VA patients enrolled in a randomized trial that gave providers regular patient health assessments.Study Design. This cohort study compared five administrative data‐based, two self‐report risk adjusters, and base year expenditures in prospective models.Data Extraction Methods. VA outpatient care and nonacute inpatient care expenditures were based on unit expenditures and utilization, while VA expenditures for acute inpatient care were calculated from a Medicare‐based inpatient cost function. Risk adjusters for this sample were constructed from diagnosis, medication and self‐report data collected during a clinical trial. Model performance was compared using adjusted R2 and predictive ratios.Principal Findings. In all expenditure models, administrative‐based measures performed better than self‐reported measures, which performed better than age and gender. The Diagnosis Cost Groups (DCG) model explained total expenditure variation (R2=7.2 percent) better than other models. Prior outpatient expenditures predicted outpatient expenditures best by far (R2=42 percent). Models with multiple measures improved overall prediction, reduced over‐prediction of low expenditure quintiles, and reduced under‐prediction in the highest quintile of expenditures.Conclusions. Prediction of VA total expenditures was poor because expenditure variation reflected utilization variation, but not patient severity. Base year expenditures were the best predictor of outpatient expenditures and nearly the best for total expenditures. Models that combined two or more risk adjusters predicted expenditures better than single‐measure models, but are more difficult and expensive to apply.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ash A. S. andS.Byrne‐Logan.1998. “How Well Do Models Work? Predicting Health Care Costs.”Proceedings of the Section on Statistics in Epidemiology American Statistical Association pp. 42–9.

Ash A. S., 2000, Using Diagnoses to Describe Populations and Predict Costs, Health Care Financing Review, 21, 7

10.1097/00005650-200108000-00013

10.1097/00005650-199904002-00009

10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01097-5

10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

10.1016/0895-4356(92)90133-8

Ellis R. P., 1996, Diagnosis‐Based Risk Adjustment for Medicare Capitation Payments, Health Care Financing Review, 17, 101

10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00493-0

10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.10.026

10.1001/jama.276.16.1316

10.1097/00005650-199809000-00005

10.1001/archinte.158.6.626

Kronick R., 1996, Diagnostic Risk Adjustment for Medicaid, Health Care Financing Review, 17, 7

Kronick R., 2000, Improving Health‐Based Payment for Medicaid Beneficiaries, Health Care Financing Review, 21, 29

10.1111/1475-6773.00179

Newhouse J. P., 1989, Adjusting Capitation Rates Using Objective Health Measures and Prior Utilization, Health Care Financing Review, 10, 41

Pope G. C., 1998, Evaluating Alternative Risk Adjusters for Medicare, Health Care Financing Review, 20, 109

10.1097/00005650-200107000-00006

10.1034/j.1600-0560.2002.67.x

10.1097/00005650-200306000-00008

10.1002/hec.661

10.1016/0895-4356(92)90016-G

10.1023/A:1011411713949

10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002

10.1001/jama.273.19.1503

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Health Services Research

Tập 40 Số 3

887-904

Thông tin tác giả