The Patient’s Responsibility for Optimum Healthcare
Tóm tắt
Although clinicians have an obligation to act in patients’ best interests, patients frequently choose to act in ways that adversely affect health. Consequently, clinicians are often left questioning where the responsibility for optimum care lies. The criteria for determining responsibility (the Jonas criteria) are as follows: causality, control and foresight. Two types of choices lead to health problems — lifestyle and noncompliance. Patients are responsible to themselves and society for unhealthy lifestyles. Patients are subject to the consequences of unhealthy lifestyles in the form of suffering; society’s consequence is increased costs. Providers are not justified to increase an individual’s consequences because the degree of responsibility cannot be specified, and clinicians should not be deciding who deserves care. Society is justified in setting prospective consequences in the form of taxes, education and prevention. Noncompliance challenges the clinician’s duty to respect patient autonomy. Respect for autonomy requires clinicians to actively assist patients in making reasoned decisions about treatment and then to accept such decisions. The clinician must simultaneously assess patients’ competence to make decisions, and take increased responsibility for decisions when competence is impaired. Factors that need to be considered in determining an appropriate level of coercion include: the nature and degree of potential harm to the patient and to society from noncompliance; the likelihood of the harm’s occurrence; the intrusiveness of the planned coercive activity and; the degree to which the intervention is likely to be effective.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Jonas H. The imperative of responsibility: in search of an ethics for a technological age. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press, 1984
Olsen D. When the patient causes the problem: the effect of patient responsibility on the nurse-patient relationship. J Adv Nurs 1997; 26: 515–22
McGinnis J, Foege W. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA 1993; 270: 2207–12
US Department of Health and Human Services. The health benefits of smoking cessation: a report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1990
Underwood M, Bailey J. Should smokers be offered coronary bypass surgery? BMJ 1993; 306: 1047–50
Gilliland FD, Samet JM. Lung cancer. Cancer Surv 1994; 19–20: 175–95
Kabat G. Recent developments in the epidemiology of lung cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 1993; 9(2): 73–9
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorder. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1994
Kant I. Lectures of ethics (Louis Infield, trans.). Indianapolis (IN): Hackett Publishing, 1963
US Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing to bacco use among young people: a report of the surgeon general. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994
Robinson TN, Killen JD. Do cigarette warning labels reduce smoking? Paradoxical effects among adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adoles Med 1997 Mar; 151(3): 267–72
Morreim H. Lifestyles of the risky and infamous: from managed care to managed lives. Hastings Center Rep 1995; 25(6): 5–12
Frankena WK. Ethics. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall, 1963
Stephenson B, Rowe B, Haynes B, et al. Is the patient taking the treatment as prescribed? JAMA 1993; 269: 2779–81
Richardson JL, Shelton DR, Krailo M, et al. The effect of compliance with treatment on survival among patients with hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1990 Feb; 8(2): 356–64
Rizzo J, Abbott T, Pashko S. Labour productivity effects of prescribed medicines for chronically ill workers. Health Econ 1996; 5(3): 249–65
Mill JS. On liberty. New York: Penguin, 1985
Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1971
Kant I. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals (L. Beck, trans.). New York: Macmillan, 1959
Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Office for protection from research risk reports. Appendix 6, A6–7 — A6–14, 1979. Department of Health, Education and Welfare publ. no. (OS) 780012. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1979 [online]. Available from: URL: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/oprr/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.htm [Accessed 2000 Jan 20]
Cassell E. What is the function of medicine? In: Gorovitz R, Macklin A, Jameton J, et al., editors. Moral problems in medicine. 2nd. ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall, 1976: 73–8
Miller BL. Autonomy and the refusal of lifesaving treatment. Hastings Center Rep 1981 Aug; 11(4): 22–8
Burman WJ, Dalton CB, Cohn DL, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of directly observed therapy vs self-administered therapy for treatment of tuberculosis. Chest 1997; 112(1): 63–70
Dennis D, Monahan J, editors. Coercion and aggressive com munity treatment. New York: Plenum, 1996
Alexander V, Bursztajn H, Brodsky A, et al. Involuntary commitment. In: Gutheil T, Bursztajn H, Brodsky A, et al., editors. Decision making in psychiatry and the law. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins, 1991: 89–107