The National Mastitis Council: A Global Organization for Mastitis Control and Milk Quality, 50 Years and Beyond
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Halasa T, Hujips K, Osteras O, Hogeveen H. Economic effects of bovine mastitis and mastitis management: A review. Vet Q. 2007;29:18–31.
Pol M, Ruegg PL. Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:249–61.
USDA. Dairy 2007, Part III: Reference of dairy cattle health and management practices in the United States, 2007. Fort Collins, Colorado: USDA-APHIS-VS, CEAH. #N482.0908; 136.
Microbiological procedures for use in the diagnosis of bovine udder infection and determination of milk quality. 4th ed. Verona, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2004.
Barnes-Pallesen FD, Blackmer P, Britten A, Bushnell RB, Van Damme DM, Welcome F. Laboratory and field handbook on bovine mastitis. Arlington: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 1987.
Hogan JS, Gonzalez RN, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW, et al. Laboratory handbook on bovine mastitis. Madison: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 1999.
The modern way to efficient milking. Chicago, Illinois: Milking Machine Manufacturers Council of the Farm Equipment Institute; 1964.
Procedures for evaluating vacuum levels and airflow in milking systems. Verona, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2012.
Troubleshooting cleaning problems in milking systems. Madison, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2004.
Mein GA, Neijenhuis F, Morgan WF, Reinemann DJ, Hillerton JE, Baines JR, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 1. Non-infectious factors. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 347–51.
Hillerton JE, Morgan WF, Farnsworth R, Neijenhuis F, Baines RJ, Mein GA, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 2. Infectious factors and infections. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 352–6.
Reinemann DJ, Rasmussen MD, LeMire S, Neijenhuis F, Mein GA, Hillerton JE, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 3. Getting the numbers right. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 357–61.
Neijenhuis F, Mein GA, Britt JS, Reinemann DJ, Hillerton JE, Farnsworth R, et al. Evaluation of bovine teat condition in commercial dairy herds: 4. Relationship between teat-end callosity or hyperkeratosis and mastitis. Vancouver: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality; 2001. p. 362–6.
Dodd FH, Westgarth DR, Neave FK, Kingwill RG. Mastitis – the strategy of control. J Dairy Sci. 1969;52:689–95.
Neave FK, Dodd FH, Kingwell RG, Westgarth DR. Control of mastitis in the dairy herd by hygiene and management. J Dairy Sci. 1969;52:696–707.
Human Health Risks Associated with High Somatic Cell Count Milk. Madison, Wisconsin: National Mastitis Council, Inc.; 2005. http://nmconline.org/docs/SCChealthrisks.pdf
Hogan JS, Galton DM, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW. Protocols for evaluating efficacy of postmilking teat dips. J Dairy Sci. 1990;73:2580–5.
Nickerson SC, Saxon A, Fox LK, Hemling T, Hogan JS, Morelli J, Oliver SP, Owens WE, Pawlak M, Petersson L. Recommended protocols for evaluating efficacy of postmilking teat germicides. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. 2004:379–99.
Hogan JS, Eberhart RJ, Galton DM, Harmon RJ, Nickerson SC, Oliver SP, Pankey JW. Protocol for determining efficacy of pre-milking teat dips. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the National Mastitis Council. Reno, Nevada. 1991:157–9
Schukken YH, Rauch BJ, Morelli J. Defining standardized protocols for determining the efficacy of a postmilking teat disinfectant following experimental exposure of teats to mastitis pathogens. J Dairy Sci. 2013;99:2694–704.
Pankey JW, Eberhart RJ, Cuming AL, Daggett RD, Farnsworth RJ, McDuff CK. Update on post-milking teat antisepsis. J Dairy Sci. 1984;67:1336–53.