The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound: evidence from token set size effects
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alcaini, 1994, Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory-evoked response, Psychophysiology, 31, 611, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02354.x
Baddeley, 1986, Working Memory, vol. 11
Banbury, 1997, Habituation and dishabituation to speech and office noise, J. Exp. Psychol., Appl., 3, 1, 10.1037/1076-898X.3.3.181
Banbury, 1998, The disruption of office-related tasks by speech and office noise, Br. J. Psychol., 89, 285, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1998.tb02699.x
Banbury, 2001, Auditory distraction short-term memory: phenomena and practical implications, Hum. Factors, 43, 12, 10.1518/001872001775992462
Beaman, 2000, Computational explorations of the irrelevant sound effect in serial short-term memory, 37
Berti, 2001, A comparison of auditory and visual distraction effects: behavioral and event-related indices, Cogn. Brain Res., 10, 265, 10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00044-6
Butler, 1968, Effects of changes in stimulus frequency and intensity on habituation of the human vertex potential, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 44, 945, 10.1121/1.1911233
Campbell, 1984, Aspects of hearing by eye, 300
Campbell, 2002, Auditory memory and the irrelevant sound effect: further evidence for changing-state disruption, Memory, 10, 199, 10.1080/09658210143000335
Cowan, 1990, Converging evidence about information-processing, Behav. Brain Sci., 13, 237, 10.1017/S0140525X00078456
Cowan, 1995
Ellermeier, 1997, Individual differences in susceptibility to the “irrelevant speech effect”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 102, 2191, 10.1121/1.419596
Escera, 1998, Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention switching to novelty and change in the acoustic environment, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 10, 590, 10.1162/089892998562997
Escera, 2001, Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching, Eur. J. Neurosci., 14, 877, 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01707.x
Escera, 2002, An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes, Cogn. Brain Res., 14, 325, 10.1016/S0926-6410(02)00135-0
Hjorth, 1980, Source derivation simplifies topographical EEG interpretation, Am. J. E.E.G. Technol., 20, 121, 10.1080/00029238.1980.11080015
Howard, 2000, Auditory cortex on the human posterior superior temporal gyrus, J. Comp. Neurol., 416, 79, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000103)416:1<79::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO;2-2
Hughes, 2001, The intrusiveness of sound: laboratory findings and their implications for noise abatement, Noise and Health, 13, 51
Jacobsen, 2001, Is there pre-attentive memory-based comparison of pitch?, Psychophysiology, 38, 723, 10.1111/1469-8986.3840723
Jones, 1993, Objects, streams and threads of auditory attention, 87
Jones, 1996, The object-oriented episodic record model, 209
Jones, 1999, Organizational factors in selective attention: the interplay of acoustic distinctiveness and auditory streaming in the irrelevant sound effect, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 25, 464, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.464
Jones, 2000, Interference from degraded auditory stimuli: linear effects of changing state in the irrelevant sequence, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 108, 1082, 10.1121/1.1288412
LeCompte, 1996, Irrelevant speech, serial rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness: a new approach to the irrelevant speech effect, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 22, 1154, 10.1037/0278-7393.22.5.1154
LeCompte, 1995, M.J. Watkins Grouping in primary memory—the case of the compound suffix, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 21, 96, 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.96
Lütkenhöner, 1998, High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex, Aud. Neuro-Otol., 3, 191, 10.1159/000013790
Macken, 1999, Explaining the irrelevant sound effect: temporal distinctiveness or changing state?, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 25, 810, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.810
Martı́n-Loeches, 1998, Testing models of the irrelevant speech effect on working memory with event-related potentials, Z. Psychol., 206, 1
Martı́n-Loeches, 1995, ERP correlates of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity in auditory–verbal working memory, Hum. Brain Mapp., 1, 275
Martı́n-Loeches, 1997, The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects, Mem. Cogn., 25, 471, 10.3758/BF03201123
Miles, 1991, Locus of the irrelevant speech effect in short-term memory, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 17, 578, 10.1037/0278-7393.17.3.578
Näätänen, 1990, The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function, Behav. Brain Sci., 13, 201, 10.1017/S0140525X00078407
Näätänen, 1992
Näätänen, 1987, The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic responses to sound: a review and analysis of the component structure, Psychophysiology, 24, 375, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x
Näätänen, 1999, The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience, Psychol. Bull., 125, 826, 10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.826
Näätänen, 1988, Frequency and location specificity of the human vertex N1 wave, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 69, 523, 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90164-2
Neath, 2000, Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory, Psychon. Bull. Rev., 7, 403, 10.3758/BF03214356
Page, 1998, The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall, Psychol. Rev., 105, 761, 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.761-781
Picton, 1978, Human auditory sustained potentials: I. The nature of the auditory response, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 45, 186, 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90003-2
Salamé, 1982, Disruptions of short-term memory by unattended speech: implications for the structure of working memory, J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav., 21, 150, 10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90521-7
Scherg, 1989, A source analysis of the late human auditory evoked potentials, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 1, 336, 10.1162/jocn.1989.1.4.336
Schröger, 1996, A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation, J. Cogn. Neurosci., 8, 527, 10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.527
Schröger, 1997, On the detection of auditory deviations: a pre-attentive activation model, Psychophysiology, 34, 245, 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02395.x
Schröger, 1998, Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials, Neuroreport, 9, 3355, 10.1097/00001756-199810260-00003
Schröger, 1998, Behavioral and electrophysiological effects of task-irrelevant sound change: a new distraction paradigm, Cogn. Brain Res., 7, 71, 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00013-5
Schröger, 2000, Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices, Clin. Neurophysiol., 111, 1450, 10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00337-0
Tremblay, 1998, Habituation versus changing state explanations of the irrelevant sound effect: evidence from the effects of token set size, J. Exp. Psychol. Learn., 24, 659, 10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.659
Virtanen, 1996, MEG-compatible multichannel EEG electrode array, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 99, 568, 10.1016/S0013-4694(96)96575-X
Virtanen, 1998, Replicability of MEG and EEG measures of the auditory N1/N1m-response, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 108, 291, 10.1016/S0168-5597(98)00006-9
Yago, 2001, Activation of the brain network of involuntary attention as a function of auditory frequency change, NeuroReport, 12, 4093, 10.1097/00001756-200112210-00046
Yago, 2001, Cerebral mechanisms underlying orienting of attention towards auditory frequency changes, NeuroReport, 12, 2583, 10.1097/00001756-200108080-00058
Zouridakis, 1998, Multiple bilaterally asymmetric cortical sources account for the auditory N1m component, Brain Topogr., 10, 183, 10.1023/A:1022246825461
