The Moving Home Effect: A Quasi Experiment Assessing Effect of Home Location on the Offence Location

Journal of Quantitative Criminology - Tập 28 - Trang 587-606 - 2012
Andrew Wheeler1
1School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany, SUNY, Albany, USA

Tóm tắt

This study aims to test whether the home location has a causal effect on the crime location. To accomplish this the study capitalizes on the natural experiment that occurs when offender’s move, and uses a unique metric, the distance between sequential offenses, to determine if when an offender moves the offense location changes. Using a sample of over 40,000 custodial arrests from Syracuse, NY between 2003 and 2008, this quasi-experimental design uses t test’s of mean differences, and fixed effects regression modeling to determine if moving has a significant effect on the distance between sequential offenses. This study finds that when offenders move they tend to commit crimes in locations farther away from past offences than would be expected without moving. The effect is rather small though, both in absolute terms (an elasticity coefficient of 0.02), and in relation to the effect of other independent variables (such as the time in between offenses). This finding suggests that the home has an impact on where an offender will choose to commit a crime, independent of offence, neighborhood, or offender characteristics. The effect is small though, suggesting other factors may play a larger role in influencing where offenders choose to commit crime.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bernasco W (2010a) A sentimental journey to crime: effects of residential history on crime location choice. Criminology 48:389–416 Bernasco W (2010b) Modeling micro-level crime location choice: application of the discrete choice framework to crime at places. J Quant Criminol 26:113–138 Bernasco W, Block R (2009) Where offenders choose to attack: a discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology 47:93–130 Bernasco W, Block R (2011) Robberies in Chicago: a block-level analysis of the influence of crime generators, crime attractors, and offender anchor points. J Res Crime Delinq 48:33–57 Bernasco W, Kooistra T (2010) Effects of residential history on commercial robbers’ crime location choices. Euro J Criminol 7:251–265 Brantingham PL, Brantingham PJ (1993) Nodes, paths and edges: considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. J Environ Pyschol 13:3–28 Cahill M, LaVigne N (2008) Residential mobility and drug use among parolees in San Diego, California and implications for policy. In: Thomas YF, Richardson D, Cheung I (eds) Geography and drug addiction. Springer, Netherlands, pp 85–115 Capone DL, Nichols WW (1976) Urban structure and criminal mobility. Am Behav Sci 20:199–213 Clare J, Fernandez J, Morgan F (2009) Formal evaluation of the impact of barriers and connectors on residential burglars’ macro-level offending location choices. Aust New Zealand J Criminol 42:139–158 Cohen LE, Felson M (1979) Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. Am Sociol Rev 44:588–608 Davies A, Dale A (1996) Locating the stranger rapist. Med Sci Law 36:146–156 Gonzalez MC, Hidalgo CA, Barabasi A (2008) Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453:779–782 Goodwill AM, Alison LJ (2005) Sequential angulation, spatial dispersion and consistency of distance attack patterns from home in serial murder, rape and burglary. Pyschol Crime Law 11:161–176 Gould W (2001) Interpreting the intercept in the fixed-effects model. StataCorp LP. Obtained from http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/stat/xtreg2.html on 12/20/2010 Hesseling RBP (1992) Using data on offender mobility in ecological research. J Quant Criminol 8:95–112 Hipp JR (2007) Block, tract, and levels of aggregation: neighborhood structure and crime and disorder as a case in point. Am Sociol Rev 72:659–680 Jacobs BA (2010) Serendipity in robbery target selection. Br J Criminol 50:514–529 Johnson SD, Bernasco W, Bowers KJ, Elffers H, Ratcliffe J, Rengert G, Townsley M (2007) Space-time patterns of risk: a cross national assessment of residential burglary victimization. J Quant Criminol 23:201–219 Johnson SD, Summers L, Pease K (2009) Offender as forager? A direct test of the boost account of victimization. J Quant Criminol 25:181–200 Levine N (2007) CrimeStat: a spatial statistics program for the analysis of crime incident locations (v 3.1). Ned Levine & Associates, Houston Pettiway LE (1985) The internal structure of the ghetto and the criminal commute. J Black Stud 16:189–211 Quigley JM, Weinberg DH (1977) Intra-urban residential mobility: a review and synthesis. Int Reg Sci Rev 2:41–66 R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna Ratcliffe JH, Rengert G (2008) Near-repeat patterns in Philadelphia shootings. Security J 21:58–76 Rengert GF (2004) Journey to Crime. In: Bruisma GJN, Elffers H, de Keijser JW (eds) Punishment, places and perpetrators: developments in criminology and criminal justice research. Willan Press, Portland, pp 169–181 Rengert GF, Wasilchick J (2000) Suburban Burglary: a tale of two suburbs. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield Rengert GF, Piquero AR, Jones PR (1999) Distance decay reexamined. Criminology 37:427–446 Rossmo DK (2000) Geographic profiling. CRC Press, Boca Raton Short MB, D’Orsogna MR, Brantingham PJ, Tita GE (2009) Measuring and modeling repeat and near-repeat Burglary effects. J Quant Criminol 25:325–339 Simmons JW (1968) Changing residence in the city: a review of intraurban mobility. Geograph Rev 58:622–651 Smith TS (1976) Inverse distance variations for the flow of crime in urban areas. Soc Forces 54(802):815 StataCorp (2009) Stata statistical software: release 11. StataCorp LP, College Station Tita G, Griffiths E (2005) Traveling to violence: the case for a mobility-based spatial typology of homicide. J Res Crime Delinq 42:275–308 Townsley M, Sidebottom A (2010) All offenders are equal, but some are more equal than others: variation in journeys to crime between offenders. Criminology 48:897–917 van Koppen PJ, de Keijser JW (1997) Desisting distance decay: on the aggregation of individual crime trips. Criminology 35:505–515 Warre J, Reboussin R, Hazelwood RR, Cummings A, Gibbs N, Trumbetta S (1998) Crime scene and distance correlates of serial rape. J Quant Criminol 14:35–59 Wiles P, Costello A (2000) Road to nowhere: the evidence for travelling criminals. Great Britain Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate Information and Publications Group, UK