Chế độ Kuhn trong Lịch sử và Triết học Khoa học (HPS)

Bloor, D. (1999). Anti-latour. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 30(1), 81–112. Brössel, P., Eder, A.-M. A., & Huber, F. (2013). Evidential support and instrumental rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (forthcoming). Burian, R. M. (1977). More than a marriage of convenience: On the inextricability of history and philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 44, 1–42. Burian, R. M. (1990). Review: Andrew pickering, constructing quarks. Synthese, 82, 163–174. Burian, R. M. (2001). The dilemma of case studies resolved: The virtues of using case studies in the history and philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 9(4), 383–404. Cartwright, N. (1999). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chang, H. (2004). Inventing temperature: Measurement and scientific progress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chang, H. (2011). Beyond case-studies: History as philosophy. In S. Mauskopf & T. Schmaltz (Eds.), Integrating history and philosophy of science. Heidelberg: Springer. Collins, H. M., & Pinch, T. J. (1998). The golem: What you should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Donovan, A., Laudan, L., & Laudan, R. (1992). Scrutinizing science: Empirical studies of scientific change (Vol. 193). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press. Doppelt, G. (1986). Relativism and the reticulational model of scientific rationality. Synthese, 69(2), 225–252. Dupré, J. (1995). The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard: Harvard University Press. Earman, J., & Glymour, C. (1980). Relativity and eclipses: The British eclipse expeditions of 1919 and their predecessors. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 11(1), 49–85. Einstein, A. (1982). Ideas and opinions. New York: Crown Publishers Inc. Feigl, H. (1970). Beyond peaceful coexistence. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 5, 3–11. Giere, R. N. (1973). History and philosophy of science: Marriage of convenience or intimate relationship. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 24, 282–297. Giere, R. N. (1985). Philosophy of science naturalized. Philosophy of Science, 52, pp. 331–356. Giere, R. N. (1989). Scientific rationality as instrumental rationality. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 20(3), 377–384. Giere, R. N. (1990). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Giere, R. N. (2011). History and philosophy of science: Thirty-Five years later. In S. Mauskopf & T. Schmaltz (Eds.), Integrating history and philosophy of science. Problems and prospects. Heidelberg: Springer. Hanson, N. R. (1962). The irrelevance of history of science to philosophy of science to philosophy of science. The Journal of Philosophy, 59(21), 574–586. Harker, D. (2013). How to split a theory: Defending Selective Realism and Convergence without Proximity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64(1), 79–106. Kaiser, M. (1991). Progress and rationality: Laudan’s attempt to divorce a happy couple. Inquiry, 34(4), 433–455. Kelly, T. (2003). Epistemic rationality as instrumental rationality: a critique. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 66(3), 612–640. Kennefick, D. (2009). Testing relativity from the 1919 eclipse—a question of bias. Physics Today, 62(3), 37–42. Kuhn, T. S. (1970a). Logic of discovery or psychology of research. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, proceedings of the international colloquium in the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, T. S. (1970b). Notes on lakatos. In PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association 1970 (pp. 137–146). Kuhn, T. S. (1970c). Reflections on my critics. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge, proceedings of the international colloquium in the philosophy of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, T. S. (1977). Objetivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The essential tension. Chicago: Chicago University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lakatos, I. (1970). History of science and its rational reconstructions. In PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association 1970 (pp. 91–136). Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Towards a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press. Laudan, L. (1986). Science and values: The aims of science and their role in scientific debate. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Laudan, L. (1987a). Progress or rationality? The prospects for normative naturalism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 24(1), 19–31. Laudan, L. (1987b). Relativism, naturalism and reticulation. Synthese, 71(3), 221–234. Laudan, L. (1989). If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 40(3), 369–375. Laudan, L. (1990a). Aim-less epistemology? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(2), 315–322. Laudan, L. (1990b). Normative naturalism. Philosophy of Science, 57, 44–59. Leite, A. (2007). Epistemic instrumentalism and reasons for belief: A reply to Tom Kelly’s “epistemic rationality as instrumental rationality: A critique”. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 75(2), 456–464. Magnus, P. D., & Callender, C. (2004). Realist ennui and the base rate fallacy. Philosophy of Science, 71(3), 320–338. McMullin, E. (1970). The history and philosophy of science: A taxonomy. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, 5, 12–67. McMullin, E. (1974). History and philosophy of science: a marriage of convenience? In PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association 1974 (pp. 585–601). Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing quarks: A sociological history of particle physics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pitt, J. C. (2001). The dilemma of case studies: Toward a Heraclitian philosophy of science. Perspectives on Science, 9(4), 373–382. Popper, K. R. (1970). Normal science and its dangers. Criticism and the growth of knowledge, 4, 51–58. Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. London: Routledge. Schindler, S. (2013a). Theory-laden experimentation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1), 89. Schindler, S. (2013b). History and philosophy of science: Coherent programme at last? Metascience. doi:10.1007/s11016-012-9728-4. Schindler, S. (2013c). Novelty, coherence, and Mendeleev’s periodic table of chemical elements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A special volume (forthcoming). Siegel, H. (1990). Laudan’s normative naturalism. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 21(2), 295–313. van Fraassen, B. C. (1980). The scientific image. USA: Oxford University Press. Worrall, J. (1988). The value of a fixed methodology. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 39(2), 263–275. Worrall, J. (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds? Dialectica, 43(1–2), 99–124.