The Knowledge and Value Basis of Private Forest Management in Sweden: Actual Knowledge, Confidence, and Value Priorities
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aguilar FX, Cai Z, Butler B (2017) Proximal association of and management preferences: evidence from family forest owners. PLoS ONE 12(1):e0169667. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169667
Ajzen I (2002) Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Andersson E, Keskitalo C (2018) Adaptation to climate change? Why business-as-usual remains the logical choice in Swedish forestry. Glob Environ Change 48:76–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.004
Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27:14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Bellassen V, Luyssaert S (2014) Carbon sequestration: managing forests in uncertain times. Nature 506:153–155. https://doi.org/10.1038/506153a
Bergstèn S, Stjernström O, Pettersson Ö (2018) Experiences and emotions among private forest owners versus public interests: Why ownership matters. Land Use Policy 79:801–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.027
Bissonnette J-F, Dupras J, Doyon F, Chion C, Tardif J (2017) Perceptions of small private forest owner’s vulnerability and adaptive capacity to environmental disturbances and climate change: views from a heterogeneous population in Southern Quebec, Canada. Small-Scale For 16:367–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9361-y
Blennow K, Persson J, Tomé M, Hanewinkel M (2012) Climate Change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS ONE 7(11):e50182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050182
Bush T (2010) Biodiversity and sectoral responsibility in the development of Swedish forestry policy, 1988–1993. Scand J Hist 35:471–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2010.528249
Coté M-A, Gilbert D, Nadeau S (2016) Impact of changes in the sociological characteristics of small-scale forest owners on timber harvesting behavior in Quebec, Canada. Small-Scale For 15:375–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9328-z
Cruz-Alonso V, Ruiz-Benito P, Villar-Salvador P, Rey-Benayas JM (2019) Long-term recovery of multifunctionality in Mediterranean forests depends on restoration strategy and forest type. J Appl Ecol 56:745–757. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13340
De Groot JIM, Steg L (2008) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior. How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav 40:330–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506297831
Díaz-Siefer P, Neaman A, Salgado E, Celis-Diez JL, Otto S (2015) Human-environment system knowledge: a correlate of pro-environmental behavior. Sustainability 7:15510–15526. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71115510
Dietz T, Stern PC, Guagnano GA (1998) Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environ Behav 30:450–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000402
Drescher M, Warriner GK, Farmer JR, Larson BMH (2017) Private landowners and environmental conservation: a case study of socialpsychological determinants of conservation program participation in Ontario. Ecol Soc 22(1):44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09118-220144
Eggers J, Lämås T, Lind T, Öhman K (2014) Factors influencing the choice of management strategy among small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Forests 5:1695–1716. https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/5/7/1695/pdf
Eriksson L (2017) The importance of threat, strategy, and resource appraisals for long-term proactive risk management among forest owners in Sweden. J Risk Res 20:868–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2015.1121905
Eriksson L (2018a) Effects of policy measures and moderating factors on climate change adaptation among private forest owners in Sweden. Soc Nat Resour 31:409–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2017.1382629
Eriksson L (2018b) Explaining gender differences in private forest risk management. Scand J For Res 33:716–723. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2018.1453944
Eriksson L, Nordlund A, Westin K (2013) The general public’s support for forest policy in Sweden: a value belief approach. J Environ Plan Manag 56:850–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.708324
Eurostat (2017) Agriculture, forestry, and fishery statistics. Statistical books Eurostat, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2785/570022
Fabricius C, Cundill G (2014) Learning in adaptive management: insights from published practice. Ecol Soc 19(1):29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06263-190129
Ferraro R, Edson Escalas J, Bettman JR (2011) Our possessions, our selves: Domains of self-worth and the possession-self link. J Consum Psychol 21:169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.007
Ficko A, Lidestav G, Ní Dhubháin A, Karppinen H, Zivojinovic I, Westin K (2017) European private forest owner typologies: a review of methods and use. For Policy Econ 99:21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.09.010
Fischer AP (2019) Adapting and coping with climate change in temperate forests. Glob Environ Change 54:160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.10.011
Fischer AP, Charnley S (2012) Private forest owners and invasive plants: risk perception and management. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5:375–389. https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-12-00005.1
Floress K, Huff ES, Snyder SA, Koshollek A, Butler S, Allred SB (2019) Factors associated with family forest owner actions: a vote-count metaanalysis. Landsc Urban Plan 188:19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.024
Feliciano D, Bouriaud L, Brahic E, Deuffic P, Dobsinska Z, Jarsky V, Lawrence A, Nybakk E, Quiroga S, Suarez C, Ficko A (2017) Understanding private forest owners’ conceptualisation of forest management: evidence from a survey in seven European countries. J Rural Stud 54:162–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.016
Frick J, Kaiser FG, Wilson M (2004) Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior: exploring prevalence and structure in a representative sample. Personal Individ Differ 37:1597–1613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.015
Fulton DC, Manfredo MJ, Lipscomb J (1996) Wildlife value orientations: a conceptual and measurement approach. Hum Dimens Wildl 1:24–47
Gan J, Jarrett A, Johnson Gaither C (2015) Landowner response to wildfire risk: Adaptation, mitigation or doing nothing. J Environ Manag 159:186–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.014
Gatersleben B, Murtagh N, Cherry M, Watkins M (2017) Moral, wasteful, frugal, or thrifty? Identifying consumer identities to understand and manage pro-environmental behavior. Environ Behav 51:24–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517733782
Geiger SM, Geiger M, Wilhelm O (2019a) Environment-specific vs. general knowledge and their role in pro-environmental behavior. Front Psychol 10:718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00718/full
Geiger JL, Steg L, van der Werff E, Ünal AB (2019b) A meta-analysis of factors related to recycling. J Environ Psychol 64:78–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.05.004
Germain RH, Ellis B, Stehman SV (2014) Does landowner awareness and knowledge lead to sustainable forest management? A Vermont case study. J Ext 52:6RIB3
Hagerman SM, Pilai R (2018) Responding to climate change in forest management: two decades of recommendations. Front Ecol Environ 16:579–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1974
Hendee JT, Flint CG (2013) Managing private forestlands along the public–private interface of Southern Illinois: Landowner forestry decisions in a multi-jurisdictional landscape. For Policy Econ 34:47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.009
Hogl K, Pregernig M, Weiss G (2005) What is new about new forest owners? A typology of private forest ownership in Austria. Small–Scale Econ Manag Policy 4:325–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-005-0020-y
Huff ES, Leahy JE, Kittredge DB, Noblet CL, Weiskittel AR (2017) Psychological distance of timber harvesting for private woodland owners. For Policy Econ 81:48–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.04.007
Hurlbert M et al. (2019) Risk management and decision making in relation to sustainable development. In Shukla PR, et al. (eds) Climate change and land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems. In press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/4/2019/11/10_Chapter-7.pdf
IBM Corp (2016) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp
Ingemarson F, Lindhagen A, Eriksson L (2006) A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scand J Res 21:249–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580600662256
IPBES (2013) Decision IPBES-2/4: conceptual framework for the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/downloads/Decision%20IPBES_2_4.pdf
Jactel H, Bauhus J, Boberg J, Bonal D, Castagneyrol B, Gardiner B, Gonzalez-Olabarria JR, Koricheva J, Meurisse N, Brockerhoff EG (2017) Tree diversity drives forest stand resistance to natural disturbances. Curr Rep 3(3):223–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-017-0064-1
Johansson J, Keskitalo ECH (2014) Coordinating and implementing multiple systems for forest management: implications of the regulatory framework for sustainable forestry in Sweden. J Nat Resour Policy Res 6:117–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2014.913363
Joshi S, Arano KG (2009) Determinants of private forest management decisions: A study on West Virginia NIPF landowners. For Policy Econ 11:118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.10.005
Kaiser FG, Fuhrer U (2003) Ecological behavior’s dependency on different forms of knowledge. Appl Psychol Int Rev 52:598–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00153
Karppinen H (2005) Forest owners’ choice of reforestation method: an application of the theory of planned behaviour. For Policy Econ 7:393–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.06.001
Kelly EC, Gold GJ, Tommaso JD (2017) The willingness of nonindustrial private forest owners to enter California’s carbon offset market. Environ Manag 60:882–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0918-0
Keskitalo ECH, Bergh J, Felton A, Björkman C, Berlin M, Axelsson P, Ring E, Ågren A, Roberge J-M, Klapwijk MJ, Boberg J (2016) Adaptation to climate change in Swedish forestry. Forests 7:28. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7020028
Kreye MM, Adams DC, Ober HK (2018) Protecting imperiled wildlife species on private lands: forest owner values and response to government interventions. Ecol Econ 149:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.016
Lagergren F, Jönsson AM (2017) Ecosystem model analysis of multi-use forestry in a changing climate. Ecosyst Serv 26:209–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.007
Lähdesmäki M, Matilainen A (2014) Born to be a forest owner? An empirical study of the aspects of psychological ownership in the context of inherited forests in Finland. Scand J Res 29:101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.869348
Lawrence A, Dandy N (2014) Private landowners’ approaches to planting and managing forests in the UK: what’s the evidence? Land Use Policy 36:351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.002
Lidestav G, Berg Lejon S (2013) Harvesting and silvicultural activities in Swedish family forestry—behavior changes from a gender perspective. Scand J Res 28:136–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.701324
Lindner M, Fitzgerald JB, Zimmermann NE, Reyer C, Delzon S, van der Maaten E, Schelhaas M-J, Lasch P, Eggers J, van der Maaten-Theunissen M, Suckow F, Psomas A, Poulter B, Hanewinkel M (2014) Climate change and European forests: what do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? J Environ Manag 146:69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.030
Marzano M, Fuller L, Quine CP (2017) Barriers to management of tree diseases: framing perspectives of pinewood managers around Dothistroma Needle Blight. J Environ Manag 188:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.002
McFarlane BL, Boxall PC (2003) The role of social psychological and social structural variables in environmental activism: an example of the forest sector. J Environ Psychol 23:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00080-4
McFarlane BL, Watson DOT (2008) Perceptions of ecological risk associated with Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) infestations in Banff and Kootenay National Parks of Canada. Risk Anal 28:203–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01013.x
Ní Dhubháin AN, Cobanova R, Karppinen H, Mizaraite D, Ritter E, Slee B, Wall S (2007) The values and objectives of private forest owners and their influence on forestry behavior: the implication for entrepreneurship. Small-Scale For 6:347–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-007-9030-2
Nichiforel L, Keary K, Deuffic P et al. (2018) How private are Europe’s private forests? A comparative property rights analysis. Land Use Policy 76:535–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.034
Nguyen TPL, Seddaiu G, Roggero PP (2019) Declarative or procedural knowledge? Knowledge for enhancing farmers’ mitigation and adaptation behaviour to climate change. J Rural Stud 67:46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.02.005
Põllumäe P, Korjus H, Paluots T (2014) Management motives of Estonian private forest owners. For Policy Econ 42:8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.02.007
Roczen N, Kaiser FG, Bogner FX, Wilson M (2014) A competence model for environmental education. Environ Behav 46:972–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513492416
Rohan MJ (2000) A rose by any name? The values construct. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 4:255–277. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0403_4
Ruseva TB, Evans TP, Fischer BC (2014) Variations in the social networks of forest owners: The effect of management activity, resource professionals, and ownership size. Small-Scale For 13:377–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-014-9260-z
Sagor ES, Becker DR (2014) Personal networks and private forestry in Minnesota. J Environ Manag 132:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.001
Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 25:1–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 50:19–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb01196.x
Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M, Arvai J (2016) Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed. Nat Clim Change 6:759–762. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2997
Silver EJ, Leahy JE, Weiskittel AR, Noblet CL, Kittredge DB (2015) An evidence-based review of timber harvesting behavior among private woodland owners. J Forestry 113:490–499. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-089
Sousa-Silva R, Verbist B, Lomba Â, Valent P, Suškevičs M, Picard O, Hoogstra-Klein MA, Cosofret C-V, Bouriaud L, Ponette Q, Verheyen K, Muys B (2018) Adapting forest management to climate change in Europe: linking perceptions to adaptive responses. For Policy Econ 90:22–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.01.004
Steele J, Chandran RS, Grafton WN, Huebner CD, McGill DW (2006) Awareness and management of invasive plants among West Virginia Woodland owners. J For 104:248–253. https://doi.org/10.1093/jof/104.5.248
Steg L, Bolderdijk JW, Keizer K, Perlaviciute G (2014) An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. J Environ Psychol 38:104–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.01.002
Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175
Swedish Forest Agency (SFA) (2014) Skogsstatistisk årsbok 2014 [Swedish Statistical Yearbook of Forestry]. The Swedish Forest Agency, Jönköping
Swedish Gov Bill (2007) En skogspolitik i takt med tiden [A Forest Policy in Line with the Times]. Ministry of Agriculture, Stockholm. https://www.regeringen.se/49bba7/contentassets/80c43f4e251b43939c8bf4d3a54ebd01/en-skogspolitik-i-takt-med-tiden-prop.-200708108
Swedish University of Agricultural Science (SLU) (2018) Forest statistics 2018. SLU, Uppsala. https://www.slu.se/globalassets/ew/org/centrb/rt/dokument/skogsdata/skogsdata_2018_webb.pdf
Thompson DW, Hansen EN (2013) Carbon storage on non-industrial private forestland: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Small-Scale For 12:631–657. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-013-9235-5
Thompson JR, Canham CD, Morreale L, Kittredge DB, Butler B (2017) Social and biophysical variation in regional timber harvest regimes. Ecol Appl 27:942–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1497
Thorn C, Bogner FX (2018) How environmental values predict acquisition of different cognitive knowledge types with regard to forest conservation. Sustainability 10:2188. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072188
Thorn S, Leverkus AB, Thorn CJ, Beudert B (2019) Education and knowledge determine preference for bark beetle control measures in El Salvador. J Environ Manag 232:138–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.032
Trivino M, Pohjanmies T, Mazziotta A, Juutinen A, Podkopaev D, Le Tortorec E, Mönkkönen M (2017) Optimizing management to enhance multifunctionality in a boreal forest landscape. J Appl Ecol 54:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12790
Ünal AB, Steg L, Gorsira M (2017) Values versus environmental knowledge as triggers of a process of activation of personal norms for eco-driving. Environ Behav 50:1092–1118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517728991
United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. A/RES/70/1. United Nations, New York, NY
Vicente-Molina AA, Fernández-Sáinz A, Izagirre-Olaizola J (2013) Environmental knowledge and other variables affecting pro-environmental behaviour: comparison of university students from emerging and advanced countries. J Clean Prod 61:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
Vulturius G, André K, Geiger Swartling Å, Brown C, Rounsevell MDA, Blanco V (2018) The relative importance of subjective and structural factors for individual adaptation to climate change by forest owners in Sweden. Reg Environ Change 18:511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1218-1
Walton TN, Emmet Jones R (2018) Ecological identity: the development and assessment of a measurement scale. Environ Behav 50:657–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517710310
Weiss G, Lawrence A, Lidestav G, Feliciano D, Hujala T, Sarvašová Z, Dobšinská Z, Živojinović I (2019) Research trends: Forest ownership in multiple perspectives. For Policy Econ 99:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.006
White AM, Long JW (2019) Understanding ecological contexts for active reforestation following wildfires. New Forest 50:41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9675-z