The International Court of Justice, Back to the Future: Keeping the Dream Alive
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akande D (2016) Selection of the International Court of Justice as a forum for contentious and advisory proceedings (including jurisdiction). J Int Disput Settl 7(2):320–344
Alvarez J (2014) What are international judges for? The main functions of international adjudication. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 158–178
Berman F (2013) The International Court of Justice as an ‘agent’ of legal development? In: Tams C, Sloan J (eds) The development of international law by the International Court of Justice. OUP, Oxford, pp 7–21
Brown C (2014) Inherent powers in international adjudication. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 828–847
Buchan R, French D (2013) Introduction. The International Court and restatement of fundamental principles. Int Community Law Rev 15:411–414
Cartier S, Hoss C (2014) The role of registries and legal secretariats in international judicial institutions. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 711–733
Couvreur P (1996) A propos de l’effectivité de la Cour Internationale de Justice dans le règlement pacifique des différends internationaux. Afr Yearb Int Law 4:103–134
Dupuy P-M (1995) The judicial policy of the International Court of Justice. In: Salerno F (ed) Il ruolo del Giudice Internazionale nell’evoluzione del diritto internazionale e communitario. Cedam, Milan, pp 61–82
Foster C (2014) New clothes for the emperor? Consultation of experts by the ICJ. J Int Disput Settl 5:139–173
Gelas H (2004) Procédure contentieuse internationale et souveraineté étatique. Mimeographed copy of doctoral thesis, Université Panthéon-Assas (Paris II)
Gowlland-Debbas V (2013) The role of the International Court of Justice in the development of the contemporary law of treaties. In: Tams C, Sloan J (eds) The development of international law by the International Court of Justice. OUP, Oxford, pp 25–52
Gray C (2013) The International Court of Justice and the use of force. In: Tams C, Sloan J (eds) The development of international law by the International Court of Justice. OUP, Oxford, pp 237–261
Helfer L (2014) The effectiveness of international adjudicators. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 464–482
Huneeus A (2014) Compliance with judgments and decisions. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 437–463
Keene A (2016) Outcome paper for the Seminar on the International Court of Justice at 70: in retrospect and in prospect. J Int Disput Settl 7(2):238–265
Kolb R (2013) The International Court of Justice. Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland
Kooijmans P (2007) The ICJ in the 21st century: judicial restraint, judicial activism or proactive judicial policy. Int Comp Law Q 56:741–753
Lachs M (1990) Thoughts on the recent jurisprudence of the International Court of Justice. Emory Int Law Rev 4:77–94
Lauterpacht H (1982) The development of international law by the International Court of Justice. CUP, Cambridge
Leonhardsen E (2014) Trials of ordeal in the International Court of Justice. Why States seek provisional measures when non-compliance is to be expected. J Int Disput Settl 5:306–343
Lowe V, Tzanakopoulos A (2013) The development of the law of the sea by the International Court of Justice. In: Tams C, Sloan J (eds) The development of international law by the International Court of Justice. OUP, Oxford, pp 177–193
Mahoney P (2008) The international judiciary—independence and accountability. Law Pract Int Courts and Tribunals 7:313–349
Miles C (2013) The origins of the law of provisional measures before international courts and tribunals. ZAöRV 73:615–672
Nollkaemper A (2014) Conversations among courts: domestic and international adjudicators. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 523–549
Oda S (1996) Provisional measures. The practice of the International Court of Justice. In: Lowe V, Fitzmaurice M (eds) Fifty years of the International Court of Justice. Essays in honour of Sir Robert Jennings. Grotius Publications CUP, Cambridge, pp 541–556
Palombino F (2010) Judicial economy and limitation of the scope of the decision in international adjudication. Leiden J Int Law 23:909–932
Pollack M (2014) Political science and international adjudication. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 357–387
Rosenne S (2006) The law and practice of the International Court of Justice 1920-2005, 4th edn. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden/Boston
Scobbie I (2012) ‘All right Mr. DeMille, I’m ready for my close-up’; some critical reflections on Professor Cassese’s ‘The International Court of Justice: it is high time to restyle the respected old lady’. Eur J Int Law 23:1071–1088
Shany Y (2014) Jurisdiction and admissibility. In: Romano R et al (eds) The Oxford handbook of international adjudication. OUP, Oxford, pp 779–805
Tams C (2013) The ICJ as a ‘law-formative agency’: summary and synthesis. In: Tams C, Sloan J (eds) The development of international law by the International Court of Justice. OUP, Oxford, pp 377–396
Thirlway H (2002) Judicial activism and the International Court of Justice. In: Ando Nisuke et al (eds) Liber amicorum Judge Sigheru Oda. Kluwer Law International, The Hague/London/New York, pp 75–105
Thirlway H (2014) Peace, justice, and provisional measures. In: Gaja G, Grote Stoutenburg J (eds) Enhancing the rule of law through the International Court of Justice. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston, pp 75–86
Thirlway H (2016a) The International Court of Justice. OUP, Oxford
Thirlway H (2016b) The International Court of Justice: cruising ahead at 70. Leiden J Int Law 29:1103–1119
Trindade C (2014) Reflections on a century of international justice and prospects for the future. In: Gaja G, Grote Stoutenburg J (eds) Enhancing the rule of law through the International Court of Justice. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/Boston, pp 1–32
Worster W (2016) Unilateral diplomatic assurances as an alternative to provisional measures. Law Pract Int Courts Trib 15:445–471
Zarbiyev F (2012) Judicial activism in international law—a conceptual framework for analysis. J Int Disput Settl 3:247–278