The Influence of Structural Complexity on Fish–zooplankton Interactions: A Study Using Artificial Submerged Macrophytes
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aksnes, D.L. & J. Giske. 1993. A theoretical model of aquatic visual feeding. Ecol. Modelling 67: 233–250.
Anderson, O. 1984. Optimal foraging by largemouth bass in structured environments. Ecology 65: 851–861.
Beklioglu, M. & B. Moss. 1996. Existence of a macrophytedominated clear water state over a very wide range of nutrient concentrations in a small shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 337: 93–106.
Breck, J.E. 1993. Foraging theory and piscivorous fish: are forage fish just big zooplankton? Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 122: 902–911.
Browman, H.I. & W.J. O'Brien. 1992. The ontogeny of search behavior in the white crappie, Pomoxis annularis. Env. Biol. Fish. 34: 181–195.
Brown, J.S. 1992. Patch use under predation risk: I. Models and predictions. An. Zool. Fenn. 29: 301–309.
Brown, J.S. 1997. Game theory and habitat selection. pp. 188–220. In: L. Dugatkin & K. Reeves (ed.) Game Theory and Animal Behaviour, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Carpenter, S.R. & D.M. Lodge. 1986. Effects of submersed macrophytes on ecosystem processes. Aquat. Bot. 26: 341–370.
Confer, J.L. & P.I. Blades. 1975. Omnivorous zooplankton and planktivorous fish. Limnol.Oceanogr. 20: 571–579.
Cooks, W.L. & F.A. Streams. 1984. Fish predation on Notonecta (Hemiptera): relationship between prey risk and habitat utilization. Oecologia 64: 177–183.
Crowder, L.B. & W.E. Cooper. 1979. Structural complexity and fish-prey interactions in ponds: a point of view. pp. 2–10. In: D.L. Johnson & R.A. Stein (ed.), Response of Fish to Habitat Structure in Standing Water, Special publication number 6, North Central Division, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.
Crowder, L.B. & W.E. Cooper. 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63: 1802–1813.
Cryer, M. & C.R. Townsend. 1988. Spatial distribution of zooplankton in a shallow eutrophic lake, with a discussion of its relation to fish predation. J. Plankton Res. 10: 487–501.
Diehl, S. 1988. Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light. Oikos 53: 207–214.
Dionne, M. & C.L. Folt. 1991. Anexperimental analysis of macrophyte growth forms as fish foraging habitats. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 123–131.
Drenner, R.W., J.R. Strickler & W.J. O'Brien. 1978. Capture probability: the role of zooplankton escape in the selective feeding of planktivorous fish. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 35: 1370–1373.
Dunbrack, R.L. & L.M. Dill. 1984. Three-dimensional prey reaction field of the juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41: 1176–1182.
Gelwick, F.P. & W.J. Matthew. 1992. Effects of an algivorous minnow on temperate stream ecosystem properties. Ecology 73: 1630–1645.
Gerritsen, J. & J.R. Strickler. 1977. Encounter probabilities and community structure in zooplankton: a mathematical model. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 34: 73–82.
Gliwicz, Z.M. & J. Pijanowska. 1989. The role of predation in zooplankton succession. pp. 253–296. In: U. Sommer (ed.) Plankton Ecology: Succession in Planktonic Community, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Gotceitas, V. & P. Colgan. 1987. Selection between densities of artificial vegetation by young bluegills avoiding predation. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 116: 40–49.
Gotceitas, V. & P. Colgan. 1989. Predator foraging success and habitat complexity: quantitative test of the threshold hypothesis. Oecologia 80: 158–166.
Heck, K.L., Jr. & R.J. Orth. 1980. Seagrass habitats: the roles of habitat complexity, competing, and predation in structuring associated fish and motile macroinvertebrate assemblages. pp. 449–464. In: V.S. Kennedy (ed.) Estuarine Perspectives, Academic Press, New York.
Heck, K.L., Jr. & T.A. Thoman. 1981. Experiments on predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 53: 125–134.
Irvine, K., B. Moss & H. Balls. 1989. The loss of submerged plants with eutrophication. II. Relationships between fish and zooplankton in a set of experimental ponds, and conclusion. Freshwater Biol. 22: 89–107.
Irvine, K., B. Moss & J. Stansfield. 1990. The potential of artificial refugia for maintaining a community of large-bodied cladocera against fish predation in a shallow eutrophic lake. Hydrobiologia 200/201: 379–389.
Jayaweera, M. & T. Asaeda. 1995. Impacts of environmental scenarios on chlorophyll-a in the management of shallow, eutrophic lakes following biomanipulation: an application of a numerical model. Ecol. Eng. 5: 445–468.
Jeppesen, E.M., T.L. Lauridsen, T. Kairesalo & M.R. Perrow. 1998. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. pp. 91–114. In: E.M. Jeppesen, M. Søndergaard, M. Søndergaard & K. Christoffersen (ed.) The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes on Lakes, Springer-Verlag, New York.
Johnsen, G.H. & P.J. Jakobsen. 1987. The effect of food limitation on vertical migration in Daphnia longispina. Limnol. Oceanogr. 32: 873–880.
Killigore, K.J., R.P. Morgan II & N.B. Rybicki. 1989. Distribution and abundance of fishes associated with submersed aquatic plants in the Potomac River. N. Amer. J. Fish. Manag. 9: 101–110.
Lazzaro, X. 1987. A review of planktivorous fishes: their evolution, feeding behaviors, selectivities, and impacts. Hydrobiologia 146: 97–167.
Leibold, M.A. 1990. Resources and predation can affect the vertical distribution of zooplankton. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35: 938–944.
Letcher, B.H., J.A. Rice, L.B. Crowder & K.A. Rose. 1996. Variability in survival of larval fish: disentangling components with an individual based model. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53: 787–801.
Lima, S.L. & L.M. Dill. 1990. Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68: 619–640.
Luecke, C. & W.J. O'Brien. 1981. Prey location volume of a planktivorous fish: a new measure of prey vulnerability. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 38: 1264–1270.
Manatunge, J. & T. Asaeda. 1999. Optimal foraging as the criteria of prey selection by two centrarchid fishes. Hydrobiologia 391: 223–240.
Masuda, H., K. Amaoka, C. Araga, T. Uyeno & T. Yoshino (eds). 1988. The fishes of the Japanese Archipelago. Tokai University Press, Tokyo. 456 pp. (in Japanese).
Milinski, M. 1984. Apredator's cost of overcoming the confusion effect of swarming prey. Anim. Behav. 32: 1157–1162.
Minello, T.J. & R.J. Zimmerman. 1983. Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: the effect of simulated Spartina structure on predation rates. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 72: 211–231.
Mittelbach, G.G. 1984. Predation and resource partitioning in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 65: 499–413.
Nelson, W.G. 1979. Experimental studies of selective predation on amphipods: consequences for amphipod distribution and abundance. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 38: 225–240.
O'Brien, W.J., B.I. Evans & H.I. Browman. 1989. Flexible search tactics and efficient foraging in saltatory searching animals. Oecologia 80: 100–110.
Okada, Y. 1966. Fishes of Japan. Uno Shoten Co., Tokyo. 434 pp.
Okuda, S., T. Shibata, Y. Shimatani, N. Mizuno, M. Yajima & T. Yamagishi. 1996. Cyclopedia of river biota. Prepared for Japanese River Front Planning and Management Centre, Sankaido Publishers, Tokyo. 346 pp. (in Japanese).
Persson, L. 1993. Predator-mediated competition in prey refuges: the importance of habitat dependent prey resources. Oikos 68: 12–22.
Peters, R.H. 1984. Methods for the study of feeding, grazing and assimilating by zooplankton. pp. 336–412. In: J.A. Downing & F.H. Rigler (ed.), A Manual of Methods for the Assessment of Secondary Productivity in Freshwaters, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.
Peterson, J.H. & D.L. DeAngelis. 1992. Functional response and capture timing in an individual-based model: predation by northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oregonensis) on juvenile salmonoids in the Columbia River. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 2551–2565.
Raess, F. & E.J. Maly. 1986. The short-term effects of perch predation on a zooplankton prey community. Hydrobiologia 140: 155–160.
Savino, J.F. & R.A. Stein. 1982. Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 111: 255–266.
Savino, J.F. & R.A. Stein. 1989a. Behavior of fish predators and their prey: habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation. Env. Biol. Fish. 24: 287–293.
Savino, J.F. & R.A. Stein. 1989b. Behavioral interactions between fish predators and their prey: effects of plant density. Anim. Behav. 37: 311–321.
Savino, J.F., E.A. Marshall & R.A. Stein. 1992. Bluegill growth as modified by plant density: exploration of underlying mechanisms. Oecologia 89: 153–160.
Schriver, P., J. Bøgestrand, E. Jeppesen & M. Søndergaard. 1995. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton-phytoplankton interactions: large-scale enclosure experiments in a shallow eutrophic lake. Fresh. Biol. 33: 255–270.
Vinyard, G.L. & W.J. O'Brien. 1976. Effects of light and turbidity on the reactive distance of bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 33: 2845–2849.
Werner, E.E., J.F. Gilliam, D.J. Hall & G.G. Mittelbach. 1983a. An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64: 1540–1548.
Werner, E.E., G.G. Mittelbach, D.J. Hall & J.F. Gilliam. 1983b. Experimental tests of optimal habitat use in fish: the role of relative habitat profitability. Ecology 64: 1525–1539.
Winfield, I.J. 1986. The influence of simulated aquatic macrophytes on the zooplankton consumption rate of juvenile roach, Rutilus rutilus, rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus, and perch, Perca fluviatilis. J. Fish Biol. 29 (Supplement A): 37–48.
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 4th edition. Prentice Hall International, Englewood Cliffs. 663 pp.