The Influence of Drying Method on Volatile Composition and Sensory Profile of Boletus edulis

Journal of Food Quality - Tập 2018 - Trang 1-11 - 2018
Joanna Politowicz1, Krzysztof Lech2, Adam Figiel2, Antoni Szumny1, Ángel A. Carbonell‐Barrachina3
1The Faculty of Food Science, Department of Chemistry, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Norwida 25, 53-375 Wrocław, Poland
2Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Chełmońskiego 37/41, 51-630 Wrocław, Poland
3Research Group “Food Quality and Safety”, Agro-Food Technology Department, Escuela Politécnica Superior de Orihuela, Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Ctra. Beniel, km 3.2, 03312-Orihuela, Alicante, Spain

Tóm tắt

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different drying methods on aroma and sensory profile of Boletus edulis (cepe). The drying methods tested were convective drying (CD), freeze-drying (FD), vacuum microwave drying (VMD), and a combination of convective predrying and vacuum microwave finish-drying (CPD-VMFD). Fresh and dried cepe volatiles, analyzed by SPME and GC-MS, showed the presence of 53 volatile compounds, most of them present in all dried samples but with quantitative variation. The major volatile compounds in fresh and dried cepe were 1-octen-3-ol (3405 µg 100 g−1·db), 3-octanone (429 µg 100 g−1·db), and hexanal (355 µg 100 g−1·db). The results showed that drying of cepe mushrooms caused major losses of aroma compounds; however, the highest content of volatile compounds and the highest intensity of most of the key positive sensory attributes were found in samples after (i) CD at 80°C (3763 µg 100 g−1·db), (ii) CD at 70°C (3478 µg 100 g−1·db), and (iii) CPD at 60°C and VMFD at 480/240 W (2897 µg 100 g−1·db).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/jsfa.5960

10.1016/j.fbio.2015.04.006

10.3390/molecules21070938

10.1021/jf001525d

2006, Scientiarum Polonorum, Technologia Alimentaria, 5, 5

10.1080/07373937.2011.594194

10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00913.x

10.1080/07373937.2013.824895

10.1007/s11947-013-1130-8

10.1016/s0963-9969(98)00070-2

10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.03.007

10.1080/07373930600952776

10.1080/07373930701372254

10.1002/jsfa.8406

1993, Sensory analysis–General guidance for the selection, training and monitoring of assessors—Part 1: selected assessors

10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.04.067

2011, Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 13, 655

10.1080/07373937.2015.1075209

10.1007/s11947-014-1383-x

10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.029

10.1007/s11947-013-1062-3

10.1007/s11947-013-1222-5

10.3390/ijms18010071

10.1080/07373931003609666

10.15835/nbha.43.1.9731

10.1002/jms.3469

10.1134/s0003683809020124

10.1155/2015/951748

10.1615/intjmedmushrooms.v19.i5.50

10.1016/j.foodchem.2003.08.016

10.1021/jf60190a032

10.1134/s0003683809050159

10.1016/j.foodres.2005.09.005

10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.10.018

10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.12.033

10.1016/s0260-8774(98)00131-9