The Impact of Near‐Universal Insurance Coverage on Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: Evidence from Massachusetts

Health Economics (United Kingdom) - Tập 25 Số 4 - Trang 391-407 - 2016
Lindsay M. Sabik1, Cathy J. Bradley1
1Department of Healthcare Policy and Research, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

Tóm tắt

AbstractThis paper investigates the effect of expansion to near‐universal health insurance coverage in Massachusetts on breast and cervical cancer screening. We use data from 2002 to 2010 to compare changes in receipt of mammograms and Pap tests in Massachusetts relative to other New England states. We also consider the effect specifically among low‐income women. We find positive effects of Massachusetts health reform on cancer screening, suggesting a 4 to 5% increase in mammograms and 6 to 7% increase in Pap tests annually. Increases in both breast and cervical cancer screening are larger 3 years after the implementation of reform than in the year immediately following, suggesting that there may be an adjustment or learning period. Low‐income women experience greater increases in breast and cervical cancer screening than the overall population; among women with household income less than 250% of the federal poverty level, mammograms increase by approximately 8% and Pap tests by 9%. Overall, Massachusetts health reform appears to have increased breast and cervical cancer screening, particularly among low‐income women. Our results suggest that reform was successful in promoting preventive care among targeted populations. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aetna.Clinical Policy Bulletin: Mammography.http://www.aetna.com/cpb/medical/data/500_599/0584.html[4 September 2014].

10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00032-6

10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1002

10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.03.007

Caplan LS, 2003, Validity of women's self‐reports of cancer screening test utilization in a managed care population, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12, 1182

CDC, 2012, Cancer Screening—United States, 2010, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly, 61, 41

10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0319

10.1093/qje/qjs020

10.1111/j.1540-6296.2008.00129.x

10.1097/MLR.0b013e318202858e

Hartmann KE, 2002, Screening for cervical cancer. Systematic Evidence Reviews

Howlader N, 2012, SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975‐2009

Kaiser Family Foundation.2012.Coverage of Preventive Services for Adults in Medicaid.http://kaiserfamilyfoundation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/8359.pdf[11 August 2014].

10.1002/cncr.27757

10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.07.003

10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0653

LongSK.2008.The impact of health reform on underinsurance in Massachusetts: do the insured have adequate protection?Massachusetts Health Reform Survey Policy Brief.http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411771_mass_underinsurance.pdf[11 August 2014].

10.1257/aer.99.2.508

10.1377/hlthaff.28.4.w578

10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0337

10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1079

Massachusetts Health Connector.2008.Guidance Regarding Minimum Creditable Coverage (MCC) Certification on and after January 1 2009.https://www.mahealthconnector.info/portal/binary/com.epicentric.contentmanagement.servlet.ContentDeliveryServlet/Health%2520Care%2520Reform/What%2520Insurance%2520Covers/MCC%2520Background/AdminBulletinsCombined.pdf[11 August 2014].

10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.07.004

10.5034/inquiryjrnl_49.04.05

10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009

10.1002/cncr.28105

10.1001/jama.295.17.2027

10.1089/jwh.2007.0603

10.1353/hpu.2011.0079

10.1056/NEJMp0909851

10.1007/s10552-010-9536-3

United Healthcare.2014.Coverage Determination Guideline: Preventive Care Services.https://www.unitedhealthcareonline.com/ccmcontent/ProviderII/UHC/en‐US/Assets/ProviderStaticFiles/ProviderStaticFilesPdf/Tools%20and%20Resources/Policies%20and%20Protocols/Medical%20Policies/Medical%20Policies/Preventive_Care_Services_CD.pdf[5 September 2014].

10.2105/AJPH.86.7.1016

10.1007/s11606-010-1482-y