The Great Beauty: Public Subsidies in the Italian Movie Industry

Italian Economic Journal - Tập 1 - Trang 445-455 - 2015
G. Meloni1,2, D. Paolini1,2,3, M. Pulina2,4
1DiSea, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
2CRENoS, Cagliari, Italy
3CORE, Louvain-la-Neuve, BELGIUM
4POLCOMING, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy

Tóm tắt

We examine the impact of public subsidies in the Italian movie industry by considering two dimensions: quantity (box-office revenues) and quality (film festival awards). Public subsidies and movie genres are employed as explanatory variables to investigate how public intervention and genre influence movie industry performance. We find that although public funding shows an overall negative influence on quantity and quality, there are some differences when considering public subsidies by genre. On balance, there is statistical evidence that dramas and thrillers are the genres that should be primarily financed by public agents.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bagella M, Becchetti L (1999) The determinants of motion picture box-office performance: evidence from motion pictures produced in Italy. J Cult Econ 23:237–256 Basuroy S, Ravid SA (2014) How relevant are experts in the internet age? Evidence from the motion pictures industry. Working Paper, University of Oklahoma Belleflamme P, Paolini D (2015) Strategic promotion and release decisions for cultural goods. mimeo, CORE Chiou L (2008) The timing of movie releases: evidence from the home video industry. Int J Ind Organ 26(5):1059–1073 Chisholm DC, Fernandez-Blanco V, Ravid SA, Walls WD (2015) Economics of motion pictures: the state of the art. J Cult Econ 39:1–13 De Vany A (2004) Hollywood economics: how extreme uncertainty shapes the film industry. Routledge, London Ebbers JJ, Wijnberg NM (2012) The effects of having more than one good reputation on distributor investments in the film industry. J Cult Econ 36:227–248 Einav L (2007) Seasonality in the U.S. motion picture industry. Rand J Econ 38:127–145 Einav L (2010) Not all rivals look alike: estimating an equilibrium model of the release date timing game. Econ Inq 48:369–390 Eliashberg J, Shugan SM (1997) Film critics: influencers or predictors? J Mark 61(2):68–78 Fernandez-Blanco V, Ginsburgh V, Prieto-Rodríguez J, Weyers S (2014) As good as it gets? Blockbusters and the inequality of box office results since 1950. In: Kaufman J, Simonton D (eds) The social science of the cinema, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 269–285 Forte F, Mantovani M (2013) On conventional sources on financing movies: the case of Italy. 54th annual conference Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Department of Economics, 24–26 October Holbrook MB, Addis M (2008) Art versus commerce in the movie industry: a two-path model of motion-picture success. J Cult Econ 32:87–107 Jansen C (2005) The performance of German motion pictures, profits and subsidies: some empirical evidence. J Cult Econ 29(3):191–212 Lange A (2012) Film market trends and film funding in four selected European Countries. European Audiovisual Observatory, Council of Europe, Brussels Lee FLF (2009) Cultural discount of cinematic achievement: the academy awards and U.S. movies’ East Asian box office. J Cult Econ 33:239–263 McKenzie J, Walls WD (2012) Australian films at the Australian box-office: performance, distribution, and subsidies. J Cult Econ 37(2):247–269 Pratt AC (2005) Cultural industries and public policy. Int J Cult Policy 11(1):31–44 Waterman D, Jayakar KP (2000) The competitive balance of the Italian and American film industries. Eur J Commun 15(4):501–528