The European Labour Authority and rights-based labour mobility

ERA Forum - 2020
Jan Cremers1
1Tilburg Law School, Cobbenhagenlaan 221, 5037 DB, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

AbstractRegulation (EU) 2019/1149 establishes the European Labour Authority (ELA) as a decentralised operational EU-agency. The ELA has to help individuals and businesses to get most out of the opportunities offered by free movement and to ensure fair labour mobility. According to the Commission, it will serve the double mission of helping national authorities to fight fraud and abuse and making mobility easier for citizens. This article addresses existing problems with labour mobility and analyses reasons for insufficient compliance with local standards and other enforcement problems. The author reflects on the added value and future functioning of the ELA.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bernaciak, M.: Market Expansion and Social Dumping in Europe. Routledge, London (2015)

Čaněk, M., Kall, K. (eds.): Protecting Mobility Through Improving Labour Rights Enforcement in Europe—Transnational Monitoring and Enforcement of Posted Work. Solidar, Brussels (2018)

Cremers, J.: In search of cheap labour in Europe. Working and living conditions of posted workers, CLR-Studies 6, Brussels, CLR/EFBWW/International Books (2011)

Cremers, J.: Reflections on a European Labour Authority: Mandate, Main Tasks and Open Questions. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Brussels (2018)

Cremers, J.: The European Labour Authority and Enhanced Enforcement, Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies. European parliament, Brussels (2018)

ETUC: A hunters game: how policy can change to spot and sink letterbox-type practices, Brussels (2016)

European Commission: Impact Assessment—Accompanying the document Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a European Labour Authority, Commission Staff Working Document, Brussels (2018)

Sørensen, K.E.: The fight against letterbox companies in the internal market. Common Mark. Law Rev. 52(1), 85–118 (2015)