The Ethics of NIMBY Conflicts

Andrews LB (1986) My body, my property. Hastings Center Report, October 16, pp. 28–38

Björkman B, Hansson SO (in press) Bodily rights and property rights

Boholm Å (2004) Editorial: What are the new perspectives on siting controversy? J Risk Res 7(2):99–100

Breyer S (1999) Breaking the vicious circle: toward effective risk regulation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

Bryant B, Mohai P (eds) (1992) Race and the incidence of environmental hazards. Westview Press, Boulder

Easterling D, Kunreuther H (1995) The dilemma of siting a high-level nuclear waste repository. Kluwer, Boston

Edelstein MR (1988) Contaminated communities. The social and psychological impacts of residential toxic exposure. Westview Press, Boulder, pp. 170–189

Gillroy JM (1991) Moral consideration and public policy choices: individual autonomy and the NIMBY problem. Public Aff Q 5(4):319–332

Glaberson WR (1988) Coping in the age of Nimby. New York Times, section 3, 1, June 19

Hansson SO (2003) Ethical criteria of risk acceptance. Erkenntnis 59:291–309

Hansson SO (2004) Weighing risks and benefits. Topoi 23:145–152

Hansson SO (2005) Seven myths of risk. Risk Manage 7(2):7–17

Hermansson H (2005) Consistent risk management. Three models outlined. J Risk Res 8(7–8):557–568 (October–December)

Kingsnorth, P. Nimbys are the true democratic heroes. The New Statesman, 20040503. http://www.newstatesman.com/200405030018 .

Kraft ME, Clary BB (1991) Citizen participation and the Nimby syndrome: public response to radioactive waste disposal. West Polit Q 44(2):299–328 (Jun)

Lober DJ (1996) Why not here?: The importance of context, process, and outcome on public attitudes toward siting of waste facilities. Soc Nat Resour 9:375–394

Minehart D, Neeman Z (2002) Effective siting of waste treatment facilities. J Environ Econ Manage 43:303–324

Morone JG, Woodhouse EJ (1986) Averting catastrophe: strategies for regulating risky technologies. University of California Press, Los Angeles

Morrall JF (1986) A review of the record. Regulation 10:25–34

Munzer SR (1990) A theory of property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

O’Hare M, Bacow L, Sanderson D (1983) Facility siting and public opposition. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc, New York

Peelle E, Ellis R (1987) Beyond the “Not-In-My-Backyard” impasse. Forum Appl Res Public Policy 2:68–77 (Fall)

Peterson M, Hansson SO (2004) On the application of rights-based moral theories to siting controversies. J Risk Res 7:269–275

Rabe BG (1994) Beyond Nimby. Hazardous waste siting in Canada and the United States. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.

Renn O (1992) Concepts of risk. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds.) Social theories of risk. Praeger Publishers, Westport, CT, pp. 53–79

Ringquist EJ (2000) Environmental justice: normative concerns and empirical evidence. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME (eds) Environmental policy: New directions for the twenty-first century. CQ Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 232–256

Shrader-Frechette K (2002) Environmental justice: creating equality, reclaiming democracy. University Press, Oxford

Sjöberg L (1999) Life-values and the tyranny of unique decisions. In: Hermerén G, Sahlin N-E (eds) The value of life. Kungl. Vitterhets historie och antikvitets akad.: Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, pp. 73–84

Sjöberg L, Drottz-Sjöberg B-M (2001) Fairness, risk and risk tolerance in the siting of a nuclear waste repository. J Risk Res 4(1):75–101

Sunstein CR (2002) Risk and reason: safety, law and the environment. University Press, Cambridge

Thomson JJ (1990) The realm of rights. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

Viscousi WK (1996) The dangers of unbounded commitments to regulate risk. In: Hahn RW (ed) Risks, costs, and lives saved: Getting better results from regulation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 135–166

Webler T, Renn O (1995) A brief primer on participation: Philosophy and practice. In: Renn O, Webler T, Wideman P (eds) Fairness and competence in citizen participation. Evaluating models for environmental discourse. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 17–33

Wester-Herber M (2004) Underlying concerns in land-use conflicts – The role of place-identity in risk perception. Environ Sci Policy 7:109–116

Wolsink M (1994) Entanglement of interests and motives: assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on facility siting. Urban Studies 31(6):857–866