The Ethical Knob: ethically-customisable automated vehicles and the law

Artificial Intelligence and Law - Tập 25 Số 3 - Trang 365-378 - 2017
Giuseppe Contissa1, Francesca Lagioia1, Giovanni Sartor1
1CIRSFID, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2015) Autonomous vehicles need experimental ethics: are we ready for utilitarian cars? arXiv preprint arXiv:151003346

Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I (2016) The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352(6293):1573–1576

Foot P (1967) The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review 5(1):5–15

Gogoll J, Müller JF (2016) Autonomous cars: In favor of a mandatory ethics setting. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9806-x

Goodall NJ (2016) Away from trolley problems and toward risk management. Appl Artif Intell 30(8):810–821

Leben D (2017) A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Ethics Inf Technol 19(2):107–115

Lin P (2014) Here’s a terrible idea: robot cars with adjustable ethics settings. Wired com Available via http://www.wired.com/2014/08/heres-a-terrible-idea-robot-cars-with-adjustable-ethics-settings

Lin P (2016) Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In: Maurer M, Gerdes JC, Lenz B, Winner H (eds) Autonomous driving. Springer, pp 69–85

Millar J (2015) Technology as moral proxy: autonomy and paternalism by design. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 34(2):47–55

Nyholm S, Smids J (2016) The ethics of accident-algorithms for self-driving cars: an applied trolley problem? Ethical theory and moral practice pp 1–15, doi: 10.1007/s10677-016-9745-2

Rawls J (1999) A Theory of Justice, revised edn. Oxford University Press

Santoni de Sio F (2017) Killing by autonomous vehicles and the legal doctrine of necessity. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 20(2):411–429. doi: 10.1007/s10677-017-9780-7

Thomson JJ (1976) Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist 59(2):204–217