The Effects of Diameter, Length and Insertion Method on the Stability of Orthodontic Miniscrew

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 42 - Trang 508-515 - 2022
Wan-Ping Yu1,2, Jian-Hong Yu3,4, Shiuan-Hui Wang3, Jui-Ting Hsu3,5,6
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
2Master Program for Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
3School of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
4Department of Dentistry, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
5Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
6Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan

Tóm tắt

This study investigated the maximum insertion torque value (ITV) of different dimensions of orthodontic miniscrews for primary stability, and further explored the effects of continuous rotation insertion and intermittent rotation insertion methods on the stability of orthodontic miniscrews. Six different dimensions of orthodontic miniscrews, three lengths (6.0, 8.0, and 10.0 mm) and two diameters (1.4 and 1.6 mm), were inserted into the artificial bone specimens by using a torque testing machine, and continuous and intermittent rotation insertion methods were applied. There were a total of 12 groups, and each group was composed of five samples. The torque testing machine was used to record the maximum ITV and torque-time curve. The median maximum ITV of the orthodontic miniscrews in the 12 groups ranged between 11.5 and 23.7 N cm. In orthodontic miniscrews of 1.6 mm diameter, regardless of the insertion method, the ITV increased with length. For orthodontic miniscrews of 1.4 mm diameter, there was no statistical difference in the maximum ITV regardless of the inserted method as the differences in length were negligible (only 2.0 mm). Furthermore, there was no statistical difference in the maximum ITV required for the continuous rotation insertion and intermittent rotation insertion methods between inserting orthodontic miniscrews of similar dimensions. The maximum ITV mostly increased with the increase in the diameter or length of the orthodontic miniscrew. There was no statistical difference in the maximum ITV required for continuous rotation and intermittent rotation insertion methods.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cons, N. C., Jenny, J., Kohout, F. J., & Jotikastira, D. (1989). Utility of the dental aesthetic index in industrialized and developing countries. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 49, 163–166. Krishnan, V. (2007). Orthodontic pain: From causes to management—a review. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 29, 170–179. Yu, J.-H., Huang, H.-L., Liu, C.-F., Wu, J., Li, Y.-F., Tsai, M.-T., & Hsu, J.-T. (2016). Does orthodontic treatment affect the alveolar bone density? Medicine, 95, e3080. Chen, C.-H., Chang, C.-S., Hsieh, C.-H., Tseng, Y.-C., Shen, Y.-S., Huang, I.-Y., Yang, C.-F., & Chen, C.-M. (2006). The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 64, 1209–1213. Park, H.-S., Lee, S.-K., & Kwon, O.-W. (2005). Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. The Angle Orthodontist, 75, 602–609. Papadopoulos, M., Papageorgiou, S., & Zogakis, I. (2011). Clinical effectiveness of orthodontic miniscrew implants: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 90, 969–976. Papageorgiou, S. N., Zogakis, I. P., & Papadopoulos, M. A. (2012). Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 142, 577-595.e577. Nienkemper, M., Handschel, J., & Drescher, D. (2014). Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading. International Journal of Oral Science, 6, 1–6. Stanford, N. (2011). Mini-screws success rates sufficient for orthodontic treatment. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 12, 19–19. Leo, M., Cerroni, L., Pasquantonio, G., Condò, S., & Condò, R. (2016). Temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in orthodontics: Review of the factors that influence the clinical success rate of the mini-implants. Clinica Terapeutica, 167, e70-77. Reynders, R. A. M., Ronchi, L., Ladu, L., van Etten-Jamaludin, F., & Bipat, S. (2012). Insertion torque and success of orthodontic mini-implants: A systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 142, 596-614.e595. Wilmes, B., Rademacher, C., Olthoff, G., & Drescher, D. (2006). Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 67, 162–174. Motoyoshi, M., Hirabayashi, M., Uemura, M., & Shimizu, N. (2006). Recommended placement torque when tightening an orthodontic mini-implant. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 17, 109–114. Suzuki, E. Y., & Suzuki, B. (2011). Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 139, 669–678. Watanabe, T., Miyazawa, K., Fujiwara, T., Kawaguchi, M., Tabuchi, M., & Goto, S. (2017). Insertion torque and Periotest values are important factors predicting outcome after orthodontic miniscrew placement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 152, 483–488. Lim, S.-A., Cha, J.-Y., & Hwang, C.-J. (2008). Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. The Angle Orthodontist, 78, 234–240. Song, Y.-Y., Cha, J.-Y., & Hwang, C.-J. (2007). Mechanical characteristics of various orthodontic mini-screws in relation to artificial cortical bone thickness. The Angle Orthodontist, 77, 979–985. Chung, C. J., Jung, K.-Y., Choi, Y. J., & Kim, K.-H. (2014). Biomechanical characteristics and reinsertion guidelines for retrieved orthodontic miniscrews. The Angle Orthodontist, 84, 878–884. Han, C.-M., Watanabe, K., Tsatalis, A. E., Lee, D., Zheng, F., Kyung, H.-M., Deguchi, T., & Kim, D.-G. (2019). Evaluations of miniscrew type-dependent mechanical stability. Clinical Biomechanics, 69, 21–27. Kravitz, N. D., Kusnoto, B., Tsay, T. P., & Hohlt, W. F. (2007). The use of temporary anchorage devices for molar intrusion. The Journal of the American Dental Association, 138, 56–64. Kuroda, S., & Tanaka, E. (2014). Risks and complications of miniscrew anchorage in clinical orthodontics. Japanese Dental Science Review, 50, 79–85. Reynders, R., Ronchi, L., & Bipat, S. (2009). Mini-implants in orthodontics: A systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.09.026 Hsu, J.-T., Huang, H.-L., Tu, M.-G., & Fuh, L.-J. (2010). Effect of bone quality on the artificial temporomandibular joint condylar prosthesis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 109, e1–e5. Hsu, J.-T., Huang, H.-L., Tsai, M.-T., Wu, A.-J., Tu, M.-G., & Fuh, L.-J. (2013). Effects of the 3D bone-to-implant contact and bone stiffness on the initial stability of a dental implant: Micro-CT and resonance frequency analyses. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 42, 276–280. Whang, C., Bister, D., & Sherriff, M. (2011). An in vitro investigation of peak insertion torque values of six commercially available mini-implants. The European Journal of Orthodontics, 33, 660–666. Kim, Y.-K., Kim, Y.-J., Yun, P.-Y., & Kim, J.-W. (2009). Effects of the taper shape, dual-thread, and length on the mechanical properties of mini-implants. The Angle Orthodontist, 79, 908–914.