The Effects of Community Quality of Life on Local Policy Decisions

Applied Research in Quality of Life - Tập 10 - Trang 667-687 - 2014
Myeong Chul Ko1, Sang Ok Choi2
1School of Global Convergence Studies, Hanbat National University, Daejeon, South Korea
2Department of Public Administration, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea

Tóm tắt

Extensive scholarly debate still exists on the determinants of local policy decisions. Although many studies have explained how political, economic, institutional, and demographic factors influence local policy decisions, they have rarely applied the concept of QoL in existing public administration and policy literature. To examine the impact of QoL on local policy decisions, this study tests the relationships between QoL and local budgetary decisions, based on Peterson’s (1981) scheme that divides policy into three areas: developmental, allocational, and redistributive. Using local government expenditures and citizen surveys data from 167 municipalities in the U.S., this study finds that community QoL is a critical factor in all of the three policy spending areas. It also confirms that the impact of QoL on local spending is moderated differently across the three areas by city income levels. The findings may help local government scholars and practitioners to better understand complex and dynamic citizen needs, which in turn may result in more responsive policy decisions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Argyle, M. (1997). Subjective wellbeing. In A. Offer (Ed.), In pursuit of the quality of life (pp. 18–45). New York: Oxford University Press. Arthaud-day, M., Rode, J., Mooney, C., & Near, J. (2005). The subjective well-being construct: a test of its convergent, discriminant, and factorial validity. Social Indicators Research, 74(3), 445–476. Bailey, M. A., & Rom, M. C. (2004). A wider race? interstate competition across health and welfare programs. Journal of Politics, 66(2), 326–347. Baker, D., & Palmer, R. (2006). Examining the effects of perceptions of community and recreation participation on quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 75(3), 395–418. Baldassare, M., & Wilson, G. (1995). More trouble in paradise: urbanization and the decline in suburban quality-of-life ratings. Urban Affairs Review, 30(5), 690–708. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386. Choi, S. O., Bae, S., Kwon, S., & Feiock, R. (2010). County limits: policy types and expenditure priorities. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(1), 29–45. Clark, T. N., Lloyd, R., Wong, K. K., & Jain, P. (2002). Amenities drive urban growth. Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(5), 493–515. Clingermayer, J. C., & Feiock, R. C. (2001). Institutional Constraints and Policy Choice: An Exploration of Local Governance. State University of New York Press. Craw, M. (2006). Overcoming city limits: vertical and horizontal models of local redistributive policy making. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 361–379. de Haan, A. (1999). Livelihoods and poverty: the role of migration ‐ a critical review of the migration literature. The Journal of Development Studies, 36(2), 1–47. Deller, S. C., Tsung-Hsiu, T., Marcouiller, D. W., & English, D. B. K. (2001). The role of amenities and quality of life in rural economic growth. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(2), 352–365. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 119–169. Diener, E. D., & Diener, C. (1995). The wealth of nations revisited: income and quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 36(3), 275–286. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31. Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring the quality of life: economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40(1), 189–216. Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: relative or absolute? Social Indicators Research, 28(3), 195–223. Dissart, J., & Deller, S. C. (2000). Quality of life in the planning literature. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(1), 135–161. Donald, B. (2001). Economic competitiveness and quality of life in city regions: compatible concepts? Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 10(2), 259–274. Dunning, H., Williams, A., Abonyi, S., & Crooks, V. (2008). A mixed method approach to quality of life research: a case study approach. Social Indicators Research, 85(1), 145–158. Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27(1), 35–47. Eckersley, R. (2000). The mixed blessings of material progress: diminishing returns in the pursuit of happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(3), 267–292. Evans, D. R. (1994). Enhancing quality of life in the population at large. Social Indicators Research, 33(1), 47–88. Falkenberg, A. W. (1998). Quality of life: efficiency, equity and freedom in the United States and Scandinavia. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(1), 1–27. Ferreira, F., & Gyourko, J. (2009). Do political parties matter? evidence from U.S. Cities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(1), 349–397. Florida, R.L. (2002). The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books. Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). What Can economists learn from happiness research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40(2), 402–435. Frijters, P., Haisken-DeNew, J. P., & Shields, M. A. (2004). Money does matter! evidence from increasing real income and life satisfaction in east Germany following reunification. The American Economic Review, 94(3), 730–740. Gerber, E. R., & Hopkins, D. J. (2011). When mayors matter: estimating the impact of mayoral partisanship on city policy. American Journal of Political Science, 55(2), 326–339. Glaeser, E. L., & Gottlieb, J. D. (2006). Urban resurgence and the consumer city. Urban Studies, 43(8), 1275–1299. Glatzer, W. (1991). Quality of life in advanced industrialized countries: the case of west Germany. In F. Strack, M. Argyle, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Subjective well-being: an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 261–279). New York: Plenum Press. Gottlieb, P. D. (1995). Residential amenities, firm location and economic development. Urban Studies, 32(9), 1413. Grzeskowiak, S., Sirgy, M. J., & Widgery, R. (2003). Residents’ satisfaction with community services: predictors and outcomes. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 33(2), 1–36. Hajnal, Z. L., & Trounstine, J. (2010). Who or what governs?: the effects of economics, politics, institutions, and needs on local spending. American Politics Research, 38(6), 1130–1163. Henig, J. R. (1992). Defining city limits. Urban Affairs Review, 27(3), 375–395. Hopkins, D. J., & McCabe, K. T. (2012). After it’s too late: estimating the policy impacts of black mayoralties in U.S. Cities. American Politics Research, 40(4), 665–700. Hoyt, W. H., Coomes, P. A., & Biehl, A. M. (2011). Tax limits and housing markets: some evidence at the state level. Real Estate Economics, 39(1), 97–132. Kothari, U. (2002). Migration and Chronic Poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre, Working Paper No 16, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester. Krebs, D., & Schmidt, P. (1995). Correction for measurement error in a satisfaction with life study. In W. E. Saris & A. Munnich (Eds.), The multitrait-multimethod approach to evaluate measurement instruments (pp. 269–280). Budapest: Eötvös University Press. Liu, B., & Vanderleeuw, J. M. (2004). Economic development priorities and central-city and suburb differences. American Politics Research, 32(6), 698–721. Longoria, T. (1994). Empirical analysis of the city limits typology. Urban Affairs Review, 30(1), 102–113. Lowi, T. J. (1964). Review: american business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715. Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310. Lubell, M., Feiock, R. C., Cruz, D. R., & Ramirez, E. E. (2009). Local institutions and the politics of urban growth. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 649–665. Malecki, E. J. (1984). High technology and local economic development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(3), 262. Malecki, E. J., & Bradbury, S. L. (1992). R&D facilities and professional labour: labour force dynamics in high technology. Regional Studies, 26(2), 123. Marando, V. L., & Reeves, M. M. (1993). County government structural reform: influence of state, region, and urbanization. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 23(1), 41–52. Massam, B. H. (2002). Quality of life: public planning and private living. Progress in Planning, 58(3), 141–227. Max-Neef, M. (1995). Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 15(2), 115–118. McCrea, R., Shyy, T.-K., & Stimson, R. (2006). What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1(1), 79–96. Michalos, A. C., & Zumbo, B. D. (2000). Criminal victimization and the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 50(3), 245–295. Mohan, J., & Twigg, L. (2007). Sense of place, quality of life and local socioeconomic context: evidence from the survey of english housing, 2002/03. Urban Studies, 44(10), 2029–2045. Mullins, D. R., & Wallin, B. A. (2004). Tax and expenditure limitations: introduction and overview. Public Budgeting & Finance, 24(4), 2–15. Myers, D. (1987). Community-relevant measurement of quality of life: a focus on local trends. Urban Affairs Review, 23(1), 108–125. Myers, D. (1988). Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 54(3), 347–358. Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1977). Public Goods and Public Chioces. In E. S. Savas (Ed.), Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Performance (pp. 7–49). Westview Press. Palus, C. K. (2010). Responsiveness in american local governments. State & Local Government Review, 42(2), 133–150. Percival, G. L., Johnson, M., & Neiman, M. (2009). Representation and local policy: relating county-level public opinion to policy outputs. Political Research Quarterly, 62(1), 164–177. Peterson, P. E. (1981). City limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Phillips, D. (2006). Quality of Life: Concept, Policy and Practice. Routledge. Plagnol, A. C., & Scott, J. (2010). What matters for well-being: individual perceptions of quality of life before and after important life events. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 6(2), 115–137. Rae, D. W. (2003). City: Urbanism and its end. New Haven: Yale University Press. Rigg, J., Nguyen, T. A., & Luong, T. T. H. (2014). The texture of livelihoods: migration and making a living in Hanoi. The Journal of Development Studies, 50(3), 368–382. Rosenberg, R. (1985). What companies look for. High Technology, 5(1), 30–37. Saiz, M. (1999). Mayoral perceptions of developmental and redistributive policies: a cross-national perspective. Urban Affairs Review, 34(6), 820–842. Salvesen, D., & Renski, H. (2002). The importance of quality of life in the location decisions of New economy firms. Washington: Economic Development Administration. Schneider, M. (1989). The competitive city: The political economy of Suburbia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Scoones, I. (2009). Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 171–196. Sharp, E. B., & Maynard-Moody, S. (1991). Theories of the local welfare role. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 934–950. Sirgy, M. J. (2001). Handbook of Quality-of-Life Research: An Ethical Marketing Perspective. Springer. Sirgy, M. J. (2010). Theoretical perspectives guiding QOL indicator projects. Social Indicators Research, 103(1), 1–22. Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D. R., Cicic, M., & Underwood, R. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community-based services: a quality-of-life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49(3), 279–316. Sirgy, M. J., Gao, T., & Young, R. (2008). How does Residents’ satisfaction with community services influence quality of life (QOL) outcomes? Applied Research in Quality of Life, 3(2), 81–105. Storper, M., & Scott, A. J. (2009). Rethinking human capital, creativity and urban growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 9(2), 147–167. Tausanovitch, C., & Warshaw, C. (2015). Representation in Municipal Government, American Political Science Review, forthcoming. Thompson, J. P. (2006). Double trouble: Black mayors, black communities, and the call for a deep democracy. New York: Oxford University Press. Türksever, A. N. E., & Atalik, G. (2001). Possibilities and limitations for the measurement of the quality of life in urban areas. Social Indicators Research, 53(2), 163–187. Van Ryzin, G. G. (2004). Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(3), 433–448. Veenhoven, R., & Ehrhardt, J. (1995). The cross-national pattern of happiness: test of predictions implied in three theories of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 34(1), 33–68. Verlet, D., & Devos, C. (2009). The Main Determinants for Subjective Well-Being: A Quest for the Holy Grail? In Quality of Life and the Millennium Challenge (pp. 193–219). Williams, A. S., & Jobes, P. C. (1990). Economic and quality-of-life considerations in urban-rural migration. Journal of Rural Studies, 6(2), 187–194. Wong, C. (1998). Determining factors for local economic development: the perception of practitioners in the north west and eastern regions of the UK. Regional Studies, 32(8), 707–720. Wooldridge, J. (2008). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). South-Western College Pub. Zagonari, F. (2009). Which ethics will make us individually and socially happier? a cross-culture and cross-development analytical model. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(1), 77–103. Zinam, O. (1989). Quality of life, quality of the individual, technology and economic development. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 48(1), 55–68.