The Effect of Peer-Group Argumentative Dialogue on Delayed Gains in Scientific Content Knowledge

Anderson, 2001, The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children, Cognition and instruction, 19, 1, 10.1207/S1532690XCI1901_1

Asterhan, 2016, Argumentation for learning: Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories, Educational Psychologist, 51, 164, 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458

Asterhan, 2007, The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory, Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 626, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626

Aydeniz, 2016, Exploring the impact of argumentation on pre-service science teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7, 111, 10.1039/C5RP00170F

Chen, 2012, The impact of recurrent on-line synchronous scientific argumentation on students’ argumentation and conceptual change, Educational Technology & Society, 15, 197

Driver, 2000, Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms, Science Education, 84, 287, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A

Faul, 2009, Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses, Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149, 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Howe, 2013, Self-regulation and dialogue in primary classrooms, 147

Howe, 2009, Collaborative group work in middle childhood: Joint construction, unresolved contradiction and the growth of knowledge, Human Development, 39, 71

Howe, 2017, Small-group collaboration and individual knowledge acquisition: The processes of growth during adolescence and early adulthood, Learning and Instruction, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.007

Howe, 2015, Principled improvement in science: Forces and proportional relations in early secondary-school teaching, International Journal of Science Education, 37, 162, 10.1080/09500693.2014.975168

Howe, 2005, Chance favours only the prepared mind: Incubation and the delayed effects of peer collaboration, British Journal of Psychology, 96, 67, 10.1348/000712604X15527

Howe, 1992, The acquisition of conceptual knowledge in science by primary school children: Group interaction and the understanding of motion down an incline, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 10, 113, 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1992.tb00566.x

Jiménez-Aleixandre, 2008, Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research, 47

Kaya, 2013, Argumentation practices in classroom: Pre-service teachers' conceptual understanding of chemical equilibrium, International Journal of Science Education, 35, 1139, 10.1080/09500693.2013.770935

Kollar, 2007, Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning, Learning and Instruction, 17, 708, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021

Kruger, 1993, Peer collaboration: Conflict, cooperation, or both?, Social Development, 2, 166, 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993.tb00012.x

Kuhn, 2015, Thinking together and alone, Educational Researcher, 44, 46, 10.3102/0013189X15569530

Kuhn, 2011, Dialogic argumentation as a vehicle for developing young adolescents’ thinking, Psychological Science, 22, 545, 10.1177/0956797611402512

Kuhn, 2003, The development of argument skills, Child Development, 74, 1245, 10.1111/1467-8624.00605

Kuhn, 1997, Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning, Cognition and Instruction, 15, 287, 10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1

Larrain, 2017, Group-work discussions and content knowledge gains: Argumentative inner speech as the missing link? Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 14C, 67, 10.1016/j.lcsi.2017.04.002

Larrain, 2014, Habilidades de argumentación escrita: Una propuesta de medición para estudiantes de quinto básico, Psicoperspectivas, 13, 94, 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol13-Issue1-fulltext-287

Larrain, 2018, More is not necessarily better: Curriculum materials support the impact of classroom argumentative dialogue in science teaching on content knowledge, Research in Science & Technological Education, 36, 282, 10.1080/02635143.2017.1408581

Leitão, 2000, The potential of argument in knowledge building, Human Development, 43, 332, 10.1159/000022695

Mercer, 2013, The social brain, language, and goal-directed collective thinking: A social conception of cognition and its implications for understanding how we think, teach, and learn, Educational Psychologist, 48, 148, 10.1080/00461520.2013.804394

Mortimer, 2003, Meaning making in secondary science classrooms

Mugny, 1978, Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances, European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181, 10.1002/ejsp.2420080204

Osborne, 2004, Enhancing the quality of argument in school science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994, 10.1002/tea.20035

Piaget, 1962, The language and thought of the child

Piolat, 1999, Foundations of argumentative text processing, 117

Pontecorvo, 2016, The dialogic construction of justifications and arguments of a seven-year-old child within a “democratic” family, Language and Dialogue, 6, 306, 10.1075/ld.6.2.05pon

Pontecorvo, 1993, Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics, Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365, 10.1080/07370008.1993.9649030

Reznitskaya, 2013, Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching, Educational Psychologist, 48, 114, 10.1080/00461520.2013.775898

Resnitskaya, 2009, Collaborative reasoning: A dialogic approach to group discussion, Cambridge Journal of Education, 39, 29, 10.1080/03057640802701952

Rivard, 2000, The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study, Science Education, 84, 566, 10.1002/1098-237X(200009)84:5<566::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-U

Roy, 1990, Effects of cognitive conflict, socio-cognitive conflict and imitation on children's socio-legal thinking, European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 241, 10.1002/ejsp.2420200305

Ruthven, 2011, The epiSTEMe pedagogical approach: Essentials, rationales and challenges, Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31, 131

Ryu, 2012, Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation, Science Education, 96, 488, 10.1002/sce.21006

Sampson, 2009, The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation, Science Education, 93, 448, 10.1002/sce.20306

Schwarz, 2009, Argumentation and education, 91, 10.1007/978-0-387-98125-3_4

Sinatra, 2014, Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change, Educational Psychologist, 49, 123, 10.1080/00461520.2014.916216

Stein, 1999, Studies in Writing: Vol. 5. Foundations of argumentative text processing, 97

Stein, 2001, The origins and nature of arguments: Studies in conflict understanding, emotion, and negotiation, Discourse Processes, 32, 113, 10.1207/S15326950DP3202&3_02

Tolmie, 1993, Task design as an influence on dialogue and learning: Primary school group work with object flotation, Social Development, 2, 183, 10.1111/j.1467-9507.1993.tb00013.x

Toulmin, 1958, The uses of argument

Ucan, 2015, Social regulation of learning during collaborative inquiry learning in science: How does it emerge and what are its functions?, International Journal of Science Education, 37, 2503, 10.1080/09500693.2015.1083634

Vosniadou, 2013, International handbook of research on conceptual change, 11, 10.4324/9780203154472

Webb, 2013, Self-regulation and dialogue in primary classrooms, 69

Webb, 1995, Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups, Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406, 10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.406

Wegerif, 1999, From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible sociocultural model of cognitive development, Learning and Instruction, 9, 493, 10.1016/S0959-4752(99)00013-4

Weinberger, 2010, Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not), Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 506, 10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007

Westermann, 2012, Delaying instruction: Evidence from a study in a university relearning setting, Instructional Science, 40, 673, 10.1007/s11251-012-9207-8

Young, 2012, Disagreement and causal learning: Others’ hypotheses affect children's evaluations of evidence, Developmental Psychology, 48, 1242, 10.1037/a0027540

Zohar, 2002, Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35, 10.1002/tea.10008