The Effect of Contouring on Fatigue Strength of Spinal Rods: Is it Okay to Re-bend and Which Materials Are Best?
Tóm tắt
Small-diameter spinal rods were tested in fatigue loading before and after contouring in pedicle screw constructs using dynamic testing machines. To characterize the change in fatigue performance of spinal rods resulting from contouring. Spine surgeons have a variety of rod materials to choose from, and selecting the best rod depends on patient characteristics and rod material properties, including fatigue performance. Four rod materials were tested, all 4.5 mm in diameter: titanium alloy (Ti), cobalt-chromium alloy (CoCr), and 2 different grades of stainless steel (SS and ultra SS). Three conditions were tested: straight (virgin rods), bent (rods bent to a radius of curvature of 100 mm), and re-bent (rods over-bent to a radius of 50 mm, then partially straightened to a 100-mm radius). Fatigue testing was conducted on unilateral vertebrectomy constructs with polyaxial screws. In all conditions, the endurance limit of the CoCr rods was at least 25% higher than the other materials but could not be determined because screw failure precluded rod failure. In the bent condition, the endurance limits of Ti, standard SS and ultra SS were reduced between 20% and 40%. In the re-bent condition, the endurance limit of Ti, standard SS, and ultra SS increased compared with the bent condition. Changes in fatigue performance are best explained by residual rod stresses induced during contouring. It appears safe to over-bend and then re-bend, for 1 cycle, small-diameter spinal rods made of the materials tested in this study using tube benders, and CoCr rods were clearly superior for all conditions. However, larger rods, multiple cycles of bending and re-bending, and rods bent using other instruments such as French benders were not studied and may result in different performance under the same conditions.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Smith J, Shaffrey C, Ames C, et al. Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 2012;71:862–8.
Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:2533–43.
Farooq N, Garrido E, Altaf F, et al. Minimizing complications with single submuscular growing rods: a review of technique and results on 88 patients with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:2252–8.
Yang J, Sponseller P, Thompson G, et al. Growing rod fractures: risk factors and opportunities for prevention. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;36:1639–44.
Dick JC, Bourgeault CA. Notch sensitivity of titanium alloy, commercially pure titanium, and stainless steel spinal implants. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1668–72.
Lindsey C, Deviren V, Xu Z, et al. The effects of rod contouring on spinal construct fatigue strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:1680–7.
Nguyen T-Q, Buckley JM, Ames C, Deviren V. The fatigue life of contoured cobalt chrome posterior spinal fusion rods. P I Mech Eng H 2011;225:194–8.
Polly D, Slivka M, Serhan H. Rod bending technique affects the fatigue performance of titanium spinal implants. Poster presented at: 38th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Quebec, CA, September 10–13, 2003.
Polly D, Ruberte R, Slivka M, Serhan H. Rod bending technique does not affect the fatigue performance of titanium spinal implants in kyphosis. Poster presented at: 39th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Buenos Ares, Argentina, September 6–9, 2004.
Slivka M, Serhan H, Ibrahim K. Spinal rod contouring and fatigue properties of titanium and stainless steel. Poster presented at: 38th Annual Meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Quebec, CA, September 10–13, 2003.
Juvinall R, Marshek K. Fundamentals of machine component design. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991.
White A, Panjabi M. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1990.
Long M, Rack HJ. Titanium alloys in total joint replacement—A materials science perspective. Biomaterials 1998;19:1621–39.