The E.U.’s artificial intelligence act: an ordoliberal assessment

European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS): General-purpose artificial intelligence (2023). www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2023/745708/EPRS_ATA(2023)745708_EN.pdf Floridi, L.: AI as agency without intelligence: on ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. Philos. Technol. 36, Article 15 (2023) Ajayi, R., Al Shafei, E., Aung, H., Costanza-Chock, S., Dad, N., Hernandez, M., Gebru, T., Geybulla, A., Gonzalez, J., Kee, J., Liu., L., Noble, S., Nyabola., N., Ricaurte, P., Soundararajan, T., Varon, J.: Open letter to news media and policy makers re: tech experts from the global majority (2023). www.freepress.net/sites/default/files/2023-05/global_coalition_open_letter_to_news_media_and_policymakers.pdf Bender, E., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., Shmitchell, M.: On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? In: FAccT’21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency March 2021, pp. 610–623 (2021) Center for AI Safety: 8 Examples of AI Risk (2023). https://www.safe.ai/ai-risk Gebru, T., Bender, E., McMillan-Major, A., Mitchell, M.: Statement from the listed authors of stochastic parrots on the ‘AI Pause’ letter (2023). www.dair-institute.org/blog/letter-statement-March2023 Gebru, T., Hanna, A., Kak, A., Myers West, S., Gahntz, M. Solaiman, I., Khan, M., Talat, Z.: Five considerations to guide the regulation of ‘General Purpose AI’ in the E.U.s’ AI Act (2023). www.washingtonpost.com/documents/523e5232-7996-47c6-b502-ed5e1a385ea8.pdf?itid=lk_inline_manual_7 The Guardian: AI song featuring fake drake and Weekend vocals pulled from streaming services (2023). www.theguardian.com/music/2023/apr/18/ai-song-featuring-fake-drake-and-weeknd-vocals-pulled-from-streaming-services New York Times: ‘The Godfather of AI’ Leaves Google and Warns of Danger Ahead (2023). www.nytimes.com/2023/05/01/technology/ai-google-chatbot-engineer-quits-hinton.html Future of Life Institute: Pause giant AI experiments: an open letter (2023). https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/ The Guardian: OpenAI CEO calls for laws to mitigate ‘risks of increasingly powerful’ AI (2023). www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/16/ceo-openai-chatgpt-ai-tech-regulations Center for AI Safety: Statement on AI Risk (2023). https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk Chowdhury, R.: AI desperately needs global oversight (2023). www.wired.com/story/ai-desperately-needs-global-oversight/ Marcus, G., Reuel, A.: The world needs an international agency for artificial intelligence, say two AI Experts (2023). www.economist.com/by-invitation/2023/04/18/the-world-needs-an-international-agency-for-artificial-intelligence-say-two-ai-experts United Nations: Secretary-general urges broad engagement from all stakeholders towards united nations code of conduct for information integrity on digital platforms (2023). https://press.un.org/en/2023/sgsm21832.doc.htm Competition and Markets Authority: AI foundation models: initial review (2023). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64528e622f62220013a6a491/AI_Foundation_Models_-_Initial_review_.pdf White House: Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights (2022). www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of-rights/ White House: Biden-Harris Administration Announces New Actions to Promote Responsible AI Innovation That Protects Americans’ Rights and Safety (2023). www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/05/04/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-new-actions-to-promote-responsible-ai-innovation-that-protects-americans-rights-and-safety/ White House: Statement from Vice President Harris After Meeting with CEOs on Advancing Responsible Artificial Intelligence Innovation (2023). www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/05/04/statement-from-vice-president-harris-after-meeting-with-ceos-on-advancing-responsible-artificial-intelligence-innovation/ European Commission: Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. Laying Down Harmonized Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts (2021). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:e0649735-a372-11eb-9585-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_1&format=PDF European Commission: Annexes to the Proposal (2021). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence European Commission: White paper on artificial intelligence: a European approach to excellence and trust (2020). https://commission.europa.eu/publications/white-paper-artificial-intelligence-european-approach-excellence-and-trust_en European Commission: Europe fit for the digital age: commission proposes new rules and actions for excellence and trust in artificial intelligence (2021). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_21_1682 European Commission: Regulatory framework proposal on artificial intelligence (2022). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai European Commission: Liability rules for artificial intelligence (2022). https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/contract-rules/digital-contracts/liability-rules-artificial-intelligence_en Wörsdörfer, M.: Ordoliberalism 2.0: towards a new regulatory policy for the digital age. Philos. Manag. 19(2), 191–215 (2020) Wörsdörfer, M.: Big tech and antitrust: an ordoliberal analysis. Philos. Technol. 35(3), Article 85 (2022) Wörsdörfer, M.: AI ethics and ordoliberalism 2.0: towards a ‘digital bill of rights.’ Working Paper, University of Maine (2023c) Wörsdörfer, M.: Individual versus regulatory ethics: an economic-ethical and theoretical-historical analysis of ordoliberalism. OEconomia 3(4), 523–557 (2013) Wörsdörfer, M.: Walter Eucken: foundations of economics. In: Biebricher, T., Nedergaard, P., Bonefeld, W. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Ordoliberalism, pp. 91–107. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2022) Wörsdörfer, M.: The E.U.’s artificial intelligence act—hype or hope? Working Paper, University of Maine (2023) Oppenheimer, F.: Weder so—noch so. Der Dritte Weg. Potsdam, Protte (1933) Röpke, W.: Civitas Humana. Erlenbach, Rentsch (1944/1949) Rüstow, A.: Die Religion der Marktwirtschaft. LIT, Münster (2001) Feld, L., Köhler, E.: Ist die Ordnungsökonomik zukunftsfähig? zfwu 12(2). 173–195 (2011) Goldschmidt, N. (2002). Entstehung und Vermächtnis ordoliberalen Denkens. Münster, LIT. Goldschmidt, N.: Walter Eucken’s place in the history of ideas (2007). www.gmu.edu/centers/publicchoice/HES%202007/papers/6d%20goldschmidt.pdf Goldschmidt, N., Wohlgemuth, M. (eds.): Grundtexte zur Freiburger Tradition der Ordnungsökonomik. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2008) Häußermann, J., Lütge, C.: Community-in-the-loop: towards pluralistic value creation in AI, or—why AI needs business ethics. AI Ethics 2, 341–362 (2022) Vanberg, V.: The Freiburg school: Walter Eucken and ordoliberalism (2004). www.eucken.de/publikationen/04_11bw.pdf Vanberg, V.: Market and state. J. Inst. Econ. 1(1), 23–49 (2005) Vanberg, V.: Wettbewerb und Regelordnung. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2008b) Vanberg, V.: James M. Buchanan’s Contractarianism and Modern Liberalism (2013). www.eucken.de/fileadmin/bilder/Dokumente/DP2013/Diskussionspapier_1304.pdf Eucken, W.: Die Grundlagen der Nationalökonomie. Springer, Berlin (1950/1965) Eucken, W.: Grundsätze der Wirtschaftspolitik. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (1952/2004) Eucken, W.: Ordnungspolitik. LIT, Münster (1999) Eucken, W.: Wirtschaftsmacht und Wirtschaftsordnung. LIT, Münster (2001) Röpke, W.: Die Gesellschaftskrisis der Gegenwart. Erlenbach, Rentsch (1942) Röpke, W.: Mass und Mitte. Erlenbach, Rentsch (1950) Rüstow, A.: Wirtschaftsethische Probleme der sozialen Marktwirtschaft. In: Boarman, P. (ed.) Der Christ und die soziale Marktwirtschaft, pp. 53–74. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart (1955) Rüstow, A.: Ortsbestimmung der Gegenwart (Dritter Band). Rentsch, Erlenbach (1957) Böhm, F.: Privatrechtsgesellschaft und Marktwirtschaft. In: Böhm, F. (ed.) Freiheit und Ordnung in der Marktwirtschaft. Baden-Baden, Nomos, pp. 105–168 (1966/1980) Vanberg, V.: Die Ethik der Wettbewerbsordnung und die Versuchungen der sozialen Marktwirtschaft (2008). www.walter-eucken-institut.de/fileadmin/bilder/Publikationen/Diskussionspapiere/08_6bw.pdf Brennan, G., Buchanan, J.M.: The Reason of Rules. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund (1985/2000) Buchanan, J.M.: The Limits of Liberty. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund (1975/2000) Buchanan, J.M., Congleton, R.D.: Politics by Principle. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998) Buchanan, J.M., Tullock, G.: The Calculus of Consent. Indianapolis, Liberty Fund (1962/1999) Congleton, R.D.: The contractarian constitutional political economy (2013). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2327665 High-Level Expert Group on AI: Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI (2019). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai European Commission: New legislative framework (n.d.). https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/single-market/goods/new-legislative-framework_en Greenleaf, G.: The ‘Brussels Effect’ of the E.U.’s ‘AI Act’ on Data Privacy Outside Europe. Priv Laws Bus Int Rep 171, 1+3–7 (2021) Hacker, P., Cordes, J., Rochon, J.: Regulating gatekeeper AI and data: transparency, access, and fairness under the DMA, the GDPR, and beyond (2023). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4316944 Wörsdörfer, M.: The digital markets act and E.U. Competition policy: a critical ordoliberal evaluation. Philos. Manag. 22(1), 149–171 (2023) Wörsdörfer, M.: Digital platforms and competition policy: a business-ethical assessment. J. Mark. Ethics 9(2), 97–119 (2021) Wörsdörfer, M.: What happened to ‘big tech’ and antitrust? And how to fix them! Philos. Manag. 21(3), 345–369 (2022) Dheu, O., De Bruyne, J., Ducuing, C.: The European Commission’s Approach To Extra-Contractual Liability And AI—a first analysis and evaluation of the two proposals (2022). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4239792 Mazzini, G., Scalzo, S.: The proposal for artificial intelligence act: considerations around some key concepts (2022). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4098809 Almada, M., Petit, N.: The E.U. Act: between product safety and fundamental rights (2023). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4308072 Almeida, D., Shmarko, K., Lomas, E.: The ethics of facial recognition technologies, surveillance, and accountability in an age of artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of USA, E.U., and U.K. Regul. Framew. AI Ethics 2, 377–387 (2021) European Parliament: AI act: a step closer to the first rules on artificial intelligence (2023). www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230505IPR84904/ai-act-a-step-closer-to-the-first-rules-on-artificial-intelligence European Parliament: Draft compromise amendments on the draft report (2023). www.europarl.europa.eu/resources/library/media/20230516RES90302/20230516RES90302.pdf European Parliament: Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council on laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act) and amending certain union legislative acts (2023). www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2023-0188_EN.html#_section2 Council of the European Union: Artificial intelligence act: council calls for promoting safe AI that respects fundamental rights (2022). www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/12/06/artificial-intelligence-act-council-calls-for-promoting-safe-ai-that-respects-fundamental-rights/#:~:text=The%20Council%20has%20adopted%20its,fundamental%20rights%20and%20Union%20values Council of the European Union: Artificial intelligence act. General Approach (2022). https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14954-2022-INIT/en/pdf Hacker, P.: A legal framework for AI training data—from first principles to the artificial intelligence act. Law Innov. Technol. 13(2), 257–301 (2021) Laux, J.: Institutionalized distrust and human oversight of artificial intelligence (2023). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4377481 Röpke, W.: Epochenwende? In: Röpke, W.: Fronten der Freiheit. Stuttgart, Seewald. 167–178 (1933/1965) Röpke, W.: Jenseits von Angebot und Nachfrage. Rentsch, Erlenbach (1958/1961) European Parliament: MEPs ready to negotiate first-ever rules for safe and transparent AI (2023). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230609IPR96212/meps-ready-to-negotiate-first-ever-rules-for-safe-and-transparent-ai Kazim, E., Güçlütürk, O., Almeida, D., Kerrigan, C., Lomas, E., Koshiyama, A., Hilliard, A., Trengove, M., Gilbert, A.: Proposed EU AI act—presidency compromise text. Select Overview and Comment on the Changes to the Proposed Regulation. AI and Ethics (27 June 2022), pp. 1–7 (2022) Ebers, M.: Regulating AI and robotics: ethical and legal challenges. In: Ebers, M., Navas, S. (eds.) Algorithms and Law, pp. 37–99. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2020) Ebers, M.: Standardizing AI—the case of the European Commission’s proposal for an artificial intelligence act. In: DiMatteo, L., Poncibo, C., Cannarsa, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Global Perspectives on Law and Ethics, pp. 321–344. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2022) Attard-Frost, B., De Los Rios, A., Walter, D.: The ethics of AI business practices: a review of 47 AI ethics guidelines. AI Ethics (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-022-00156-6 European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS): Artificial intelligence act (2022). www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/698792/EPRS_BRI(2021)698792_EN.pdf Fjeld, J., Achten, N., Hilligoss, H., Nagy, A., Srikumar, M.: Principled artificial intelligence: mapping consensus in ethical and rights-based approaches to principles for AI (2020). https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/42160420/HLS%20White%20Paper%20Final_v3.pdf Khanna, R.: Dignity in a Digital Age: Making Tech Work for All of Us. Simon & Schuster, New York (2022) Leslie, D.: Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safety. A guide for the responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector (2019). www.turing.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-06/understanding_artificial_intelligence_ethics_and_safety.pdf Leslie, D., Burr, C., Aitken, M., Cowls, J., Katell, M., Briggs, M.: Artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law: a primer (2021). www.turing.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2021-03/cahai_feasibility_study_primer_final.pdf Mittelstadt, B.: Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 501–507 (2019) Rubenstein, D.: Acquiring ethical AI. Florida Law Rev. 73, 747–819 (2021) Bradford, A.: The Brussels Effect. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2020) Floridi, L.: The European legislation on AI: a brief analysis of its philosophical approach. Philos. Technol. 34, 215–222 (2021) Petit, N.: Big Tech and the Digital Economy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2020) AlgorithmWatch: Draft AI Act: EU needs to live up to its own ambitions in terms of governance and enforcement (2021). https://algorithmwatch.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/EU-AI-Act-Consultation-Submission-by-AlgorithmWatch-August-2021.pdf Röpke, W.: Ist die deutsche Wirtschaftspolitik richtig? In: Ludwig Erhard Stiftung (ed.). Grundtexte zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 49–62 (1950/1981) Rüstow, A.: Das Versagen des Wirtschaftsliberalismus. Metropolis, Hamburg (1945/2001) Rüstow, A.: Wirtschaft als Dienerin der Menschlichkeit. In: Aktionsgemeinschaft Soziale Marktwirtschaft (ed.). Was wichtiger ist als Wirtschaft. Martin Hoch, Ludwigsburg, pp. 7–16 (1960) Rüstow, A.: Paläoliberalismus, Kommunismus und Neoliberalismus. In: Greiß, F., Meyer, F. (eds.) Wirtschaft, Gesellschaft und Kultur. Festgabe für Müller-Armack. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp. 61–70 (1961) Castets-Renard, C., Besse, P.: Ex ante accountability of the AI act: between certification and standardization, in pursuit of fundamental rights in the country of compliance (2022). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4203925 Gstrein, O.: European AI regulation: brussels effect versus human dignity. Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien 04(2022), 755–772 (2022) Smuha, N., Ahmed-Rengers, E., Harkens, A., Li, W., MacLaren, J., Piselli, R., Yeung, K.: How the E.U. can achieve legally trustworthy AI: a response to the European Commission’s Proposal for an Artificial Intelligence Act (2021). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3899991 Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Russell, C.: Why fairness cannot be automated: bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 41, 1–72 (2021) Mökander, J., Juneja, P., Watson, D., Floridi, L.: The U.S. algorithmic accountability act of 2022 vs. the E.U. artificial intelligence act: What can they learn from each other? Mind. Mach. 32, 751–758 (2022) Biber, S.: Machines learning the rule of law (2021). https://verfassungsblog.de/ai-rol/ Ebers, M., Hoch, V., Rosenkranz, F., Ruschemeier, H., Steinrötter, B.: The European Commission’s proposal for an artificial intelligence act—a critical assessment by members of the robotics and AI law society (RAILS). J Multidiscip. Sci. J. 4(4), 589–603 (2021) European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS): AI and digital tools in workplace management and evaluation (2022b). www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2022/729516/EPRS_STU(2022)729516_EN.pdf Mahler, T.: Between risk management and proportionality: the risk-based approach in the E.U.’s artificial intelligence act proposal. Nordic Yearbook of Law and Informatics 2020–2021 (March 2022), pp. 247–270 (2022) Stuurman, K., Lachaud, E.: Regulating AI. A label to complete the proposed act on artificial intelligence. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 44 (April 2022), 1–23 (2022) Cefaliello, A., Kullmann, M.: Offering false security: how the draft artificial intelligence act undermines fundamental workers rights. Eur. Labor Law J. 13(4), 542–562 (2022) Laux, J., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B.: Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: on the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk. Regulation and Governance 6 (February 2023), pp. 1–30 (2023) Gangadharan, S.P., Niklas, J.: Decentering technology in discourse on discrimination. Inf. Commun. Soc. 22(7), 882–899 (2019) Micklitz, H.W., Gestel, R.V.: European integration through standardization: how judicial review is breaking down the club house of private standardization bodies. Common Market Law Rev. 50(1), 145–181 (2013) Schepel, H.: The Constitution of Private Governance. Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets. Hart, Oxford (2005) Veale, M., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.: Demystifying the Draft E.U. Artificial Intelligence Act. Comput. Law Rev. Int. 4, 97–112 (2021) Laux, J., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B.: Three pathways for standardization and ethical disclosure by default under the European Union artificial intelligence act (2023). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4365079 Klump, R., Wörsdörfer, M.: Paternalist economic policies. foundations, implications, and critical evaluations. ORDO Yearb. Econ. Soc. Order 66, 27–60 (2015) Hayek, F.A.: Law, Legislation, and Liberty. Vol. 1: Rules and Order. Routledge, London (1973) European Commission: Commission Staff Working Document. Impact Assessment. Annexes (2021). https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12527-Artificial-intelligence-ethical-and-legal-requirements_en Kop, M.: E.U. Artificial intelligence act: the European approach to AI (2021). https://futurium.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2021-10/Kop_EU%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Act%20-%20The%20European%20Approach%20to%20AI_21092021_0.pdf AI Transparency Institute: CareAI: Responsible AI Index (2023). https://aitransparencyinstitute.com/responsible-ai-index-demo/ Thelisson, E., Padh, K., Celis, L.E.: Regulatory mechanisms and algorithms towards trust in AI/ML. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 2017 Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Melbourne, Australia (2017) Malgieri, G., Pasquale, F.: From transparency to justification: toward ex ante accountability for AI. Brussels Privacy Hub Working Paper 8(33) (2022). https://brusselsprivacyhub.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/BPH-Working-Paper-vol8-N33.pdf