The Discipline of Rankings: Tight Coupling and Organizational Change

American Sociological Review - Tập 74 Số 1 - Trang 63-82 - 2009
Michael Sauder1, Wendy Nelson Espeland2
1University of Iowa
2Northwestern University

Tóm tắt

This article demonstrates the value of Foucault's conception of discipline for understanding organizational responses to rankings. Using a case study of law schools, we explain why rankings have permeated law schools so extensively and why these organizations have been unable to buffer these institutional pressures. Foucault's depiction of two important processes, surveillance and normalization, show how rankings change perceptions of legal education through both coercive and seductive means. This approach advances organizational theory by highlighting conditions that affect the prevalence and effectiveness of buffering. Decoupling is not determined solely by the external enforcement of institutional pressures or the capacity of organizational actors to buffer or hide some activities. Members' tendency to internalize these pressures, to become self-disciplining, is also salient. Internalization is fostered by the anxiety that rankings produce, by their allure for the administrators who try to manipulate them, and by the resistance they provoke. Rankings are just one example of the public measures of performance that are becoming increasingly influential in many institutional environments, and understanding how organizations respond to these measures is a crucial task for scholars.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/000312249906400403

10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x

Brooks A. Phillips.1998. “UT Law School Falls from Top 25; Officials Will Appeal U.S. News.” Austin American-Statesman, February 20, p. A1.

Burawoy Michael, 1979, Manufacturing Consent

10.1177/003804070407700302

10.2307/2393854

10.2307/2095101

10.1086/508788

10.1086/229939

10.2307/2393938

Espeland Wendy Nelson, 1998, The Struggle for Water: Politics, Rationality and Identity in the American Southwest

Espeland Wendy Nelson. Forthcoming. “Thinking about Standards in Qualitative Methods.” In Multidisciplinary Standards for Systematic Qualitative Research, edited by M. Lamont and P. White. National Science Foundation Report.

10.1086/517897

10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105908

Foucault Michel, 1977, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison

Foucault Michel, 1980, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977.

Foucault Michel, 1991, The Foucault Effect.

Foucault Michel, 2003, The Essential Foucault, 126

Friedland Roger, 1991, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, 232

Gouldner Alvin, 1954, Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy

Hallett Tim, 2008, “The Myth Incarnate: Recoupling Processes, Turmoil, and Inhabited Institutions in an Urban Elementary School.”

10.1177/0002764205285171

10.1007/s11186-006-9003-z

Hoffman Andrew J., 2002, Organizations, Policy and Natural Environment: Institutions and Strategic Perspectives

Johnson Alex M., 2006, Indiana Law Journal, 82, 309

10.1177/000312240607100404

Maines David, 1982, Urban Life, 7, 217

10.1111/j.1740-9713.2004.00058.x

10.1023/A:1018797521946

Meier Deborah, 2002, In Schools We Trust: Creating Communities of Learning in an Era of Testing and Standardization

10.1086/226550

10.1016/0361-3682(87)90039-0

10.1080/03085149000000001

Morriss Andrew P., 2007, “Measuring Outcomes: Post-Graduation Measures of Success in the U.S. News & World Report Law School Rankings.”

10.1080/00071310220133331

10.5465/AMR.1991.4279002

10.5465/amr.1990.4308154

Parloff Roger.1998. “Who's Number One? And Who's Number 52, 91, and 137?” American Lawyer April:5.

10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001

10.7208/chicago/9780226185941.001.0001

Power Michael, 1994, The Audit Explosion

Rowan Brian, 1999, Handbook of Research on Educational Administration., 2, 359

Sauder Michael, 2006, Indiana Law Journal, 81, 205

Sauder Michael, Espeland Wendy. Forthcoming. “Fear of Falling: The Effects of U.S. News & World Report Rankings on U.S. Law Schools.” Grant Report for Law School Admissions Council.

10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00261.x

Schleef Debra J., 2006, Managing Elites: Socialization in Law and Business Schools

Scott James C., 1998, Seeing Like a State

10.1093/oso/9780199276813.003.0022

10.2307/2661148

Simmel Georg, 1971, On Individuality and Social Forms

10.2307/3053709

Stake Jeffrey Evans, 2006, Indiana Law Journal, 82, 229

10.4159/9780674044036

10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.1

10.4324/9780203449721

10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331

Thompson Nicholas.2000. “Playing with Numbers: How U.S. News Mismeasures Higher Education and What We Can Do About It.” The Washington Monthly, September, pp. 16–23.

U.S. News and World Reports (USN).1990-2005. “America's Best Graduate Schools.”

10.2307/2393593

10.2307/2667086

Whitman Dale.2002. “Doing the Right Thing.” Association of American Law Schools, The Newsletter, April, pp. 1–4.