The Development of a Scale to Evaluate Trust in Industrial Human-robot Collaboration

Ding Z, Hon B (2013) Constraints analysis and evaluation of manual assembly. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(1):1–4

Hägele M, Schaaf W, Helms E (2002) Robot assistants at manual workplaces: Effective co-operation and safety aspects. International symposium on robotics ISR 2002 / CD-ROM. October 7–11, Stockholm

Schraft RD, Meyer C, Parlitz C, Helms E (2005) Powermate—a safe and intuitive robot assistant for handling and assembly tasks. IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, IEEE, Barcelona, pp 4047–4079

Santis AD, Siciliano B, Luca AD, Bicchi A (2008) Atlas of physical human-robot interaction. Mech Mach Theor 43(3):253–270

Unhelkar VV, Siu HC, Shah JA (2014) Comparative performance on human and mobile robotic assistants in collaborative fetch-and-deliver tasks. Human Robot interaction 2014. ACM, Bielefeld

ISO (2011) Robots and robotic devices-safety requirements for industrial robots, Part 1: robots. international standards organisation, Geneva

Bortot D, Born M, Bengler K (2013) Directly or detours? How should industrial robots approach humans?. ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI 2013), IEEE, Tokyo

Walton M, Webb P, Poad M (2011) Applying a concept for robot-human cooperation to aerospace equipping processes, SAE International

Parasuraman R, Riley V (1997) Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Hum Fact 39(2):230–253

Freedy A, de Visser E, Weltman G, Coeyman N (2007) Measurement of trust in human-robot collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on collaborative technologies and systems, Orland

Chen JY, Barnes MJ (2014) Human-agent teaming for multirobot control: a review of human factors issues. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 44(1):13–29 IEEE

Groom V, Nass C (2007) Can robots be teammates? Benchmarks in human–robot teams. Interact Stud 8(3):483–500

Park E, Jenkins Q, Jiang X (2008) Measuring trust of human pperators in new generation rescue robots. Proceedings of the 7th JFPS international symposium on fluid power, Toyom, pp 15–18

de Visser EJ, Parasuraman R, Freedy A, Freedy E, Weltman G (2006) A comprehensive methodology for assessing human-robot team Performance for use in training and simulation. Proceedings of the 50th Human factors ergonomics society, San Francisco, pp 2639–2643

Lee JD, See KA (2004) Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum Fact 46(1):50–80

Verberne F, Ham J, Midden C (2012) Trust in smart systems: sharing driving goals and giving information to increase trustworthiness and acceptability of smart systems in cars. Hum Fact 54(5):799–810

Mazney D, Reichenbach J, Onnasch L (2012) Human performance consequences of automated decision aids: the impact of degree of automation and system experience. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 6(1):57–87

Parasuraman R, Molloy R, Singh I (1993) Performance consequences of automation-induced ‘complacency’. Int J Aviat Psychol 3(1):1–23

Dzindolet MT, Pierce LG, Beck HP, Dawe LA, Anderson WB (2001b) Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Mil Psychol 13(3):147–164

de Visser E, Krueger F, McKnight P, Scheid S, Smith M, Chalk S et al. (2012) The world is not enough: trust in cognitive agents. In: Proceedings of the 56th annual HFES meeting, pp 263–267

Chen JY, Barnes MJ (2012) Supervisory control of multiple robots: effects of imperfect automation and individual differences. Hum Fact 54(2):157–174

Desai M, Stubbs K, Steinfeld A, Yanco H (2009) Creating trustworthy robots: lessons and inspirations from automated systems. Paper presented at The AISB convention: new frontiers in human-robot interaction. Edinburgh

Yagoda RE, Gillan DJ (2012) You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a human-robot interaction trust scale. Int J Soc Robot 4(3):235–248

Hancock PA, Billings DR, Oleson KE, Chen JY, De Visser E, Parasuraman R (2011) A meta-analysis of factors influencing the development of human-robot trust. Aberdeen proving ground, MD 21005-5425: US Army Research Laboratory

Singh IL, Molloy R, Parasuraman R (1993) Automation-induced “complacency”: development of a complacency-potential rating scale. Int J Aviat Psychol 3(2):111–122

Muir BM, Moray N (1996) Trust in automation. Part 1. Experimental studies of trust and human intervention in a process control simulation. Ergonomics 39(3):429–460

Jian X, Bisantz AM, Drury CG (2000) Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int J Cognit Ergon 4(1):53–71

Master R, Gramopadhye AK, Melloy BJ, Bingham J, Jiang X (2000) A questionnaire for measuring trust in hybrid inspection systems. Paper presented at the industrial engineering research conference. Dallas

Schaefer KE (2013) The perception and measurement of human-robot trust. Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida

King N (1998) Template analysis. In: Gillian S, Catherine C (eds) Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research: a practical guide. Sage Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks, pp 118–134

Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

Kline TJB (2005) Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and testing. Sage Publications Inc, London

Lowenthal KM (1996) An introduction to psychological tests and scales. UCL Press, London

Harris D, Chan-Pensley J, McGarry S (2005) The development of a multidimensional scale to evaluate motor vehicle dynamic qualities. Ergonomics 48(8):964–982

Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

Kaiser HF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika 39(1):31–36

Kline P (1999) The handbook of psychological testing, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

deVellis RF (1991) Scale development: theory and application. Sage Publishing, Newbury Park

Bartneck C, Kulic D, Croft E (2009) Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1:71–81

Inoue K, Nonaka S, Ujiie Y, Takubo T, Arai T (2005) Comparison of human psychology for real and virtual mobile manipulators. IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, ROMAN 2005, IEEE, pp 73–78

Huber M, Rickert M, Knoll A, Brandt T, Glasauer S (2008) Human-robot interaction in handing-over tasks. 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, pp 107–112

Mayer MP, Kuz S, Schlick CM (2013) Using anthropomorphism to improve the human-machine interaction in industrial environments (part II). In: Duffy VG (ed) Digital human modeling and applications in health, safety, ergonomics, and risk management. Human body modelling and ergonomics. Springer, Berlin, pp 93–100

Broadbent E, Stafford R, MacDonald B (2009) Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int J Soc Robot 1(4):319–330

Bartneck C, Kanda T, Mubin O, Mahmud AA (2009) Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence? Int J Soc Robot 1(2):195–204

Li D, Rau PL, Li Y (2010) A cross-cultural study: effect of robot appearance and task. Int J Soc Robot 2(2):175–186

Shiomi M, Zanlungo F, Hayashi K, Kanda T (2014) Towards a socially acceptable collision avoidance for a mobile robot navigating among pedestrians using a pedestrian model. Int J Soc Robot 6(3):443–455

van den Brule R, Dotsch R, Bijlstra G, Wigboldus DH, Haselager P (2014) Do robot performance and behavioral style affect human trust? Int J Soc Robot 6(4):519–531

Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM et al, Krämer NC (2015) Individuals’ evaluations of and attitudes towards potentially uncanny robots. Int J Soc Robot 7(5):1–26

Prakash A, Rogers WA (2014) Why some humanoid faces are perceived more positively than others: effects of human-likeness and task. Int J Soc Robot 7(2):309–331