The Dark Figure of Crime in Latin America and the Caribbean
Tóm tắt
The dark figure of crime is the gap between crimes reported in victimization surveys and crimes registered in administrative police records. This paper quantifies the dark figure of gender-based violent crimes through a systematic comparison between official crime figures and victimization surveys in Latin America and the Caribbean over 2004–2014. We find that the dark figure of gender-based violent crimes is between 92 and 95% in comparison with a dark figure of between 63 and 80% in developed countries. This means that in the region, around 5 out of every 100 crimes are found in administrative police records. The dark figure of gender-based violent crimes is similar to that of extortion and kidnapping, but it is significantly greater than the dark figure of assaults and robberies of vehicles (65 and 52%, respectively). Our results show that the perception of corruption and the low confidence in the police are positively associated with the dark figure of crime through the channel of under-reporting and that the dark figure of gender-based violent crimes is greater in rural areas. These findings provide evidence of a potential bias in administrative police data and the need for policies aimed at reducing under-reporting, in particular for gender-based violent crimes.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Averdijk M, Elffers H. The discrepancy between survey-based victim accounts and police reports revisited. International review of victimology. 2012;18(2):91–107.
Bowles R, Reyes MG, Garoupa N. Crime reporting decisions and the costs of crime. Eur J Crim Policy Res. 2009;15:365–77.
Genn HG. Findings of a pilot survey of victimization in England. Victimology. 1976;1(2):253–62.
Goudriaan H. Neighbourhood characteristics and reporting crime: Effects of Social Cohesion, Confidence in Police Effectiveness and Socio-Economic Disadvantage. Br J Criminol. 2005;46(4):719–42.
Hart TC, Colavito V. College student victims and reporting crime to the police: the influence of collective efficacy. West Criminol Rev. 2011;12:3): 1–19.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC). Encuesta Nacional de Hogares. Costa Rica; 2010.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI). Encuesta Nacional sobre la Dinámica de las Relaciones en los Hogares. México; 2011.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC). Encuesta Nacional de Hogares. Costa Rica; 2014.
Instituto Universitario de Opinión Pública (IUDOP). La percepción de la seguridad y la confianza en las instituciones públicas. Línea de Base del Plan de Acción ASOCIO para el crecimiento. Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas, UCA. El Salvador; 2013a. Available at: http://www.cdeunodc.inegi.org.mx/unodc/wp-includes/js/mapa11/pais/doc/america/ELSALV-usaid2012_Informe.pdf
Instituto Universitario de Opinión Pública (IUDOP). La percepción de la seguridad y la confianza en las instituciones públicas. Resultados de la segunda medición de indicadores del Plan de Acción ASOCIO para el crecimiento. Universidad Centroamericana José Simeón Cañas, UCA. El Salvador; 2013b. Available at: http://www.cdeunodc.inegi.org.mx/unodc/wp-includes/js/mapa11/pais/doc/america/ELSALV2013_usaid_informe.pdf
Jaitman L, editor. The welfare costs of crime and violence in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2015.
Jaitman L, editor. The costs of crime and violence new evidence and insights in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank; 2017.
Kaariainen J, Siren R. Trust in the Police, generalized trust and reporting crime. Eur J Criminol. 2011;8(1):65–81.
Murphy K, Barkworth J. Victim willingness to report crime to police: does procedural justice or outcome matter Most? Vict Offenders. 2014;9(2):178–204.
Organization of American States (OEA). Acceso a la justicia para mujeres víctimas de violencia sexual: la educación y la salud. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights; 2011
Pemberton C, Joel J. National Women’s health survey for Trinidad and Tobago. Final Report. Inter-American Development Bank; 2018
Sanguinetti P, Ortega D, Berniell L, Álvarez F, Mejía D, Castillo JC, et al. Towards a safer Latin America. A new perspective to prevent and control crime. Bogota: Andean Development Corporation; 2015.
Schneider AL, Griffith WR, Sumi DH, Burcart JM. Portland forward records check of crime victims. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1978.
Skogan WG. Dimensions of the DF of unreported crime. Crime Delinq. 1977;23(1):41–50.
Smit PR, Kalidien S, Meijer RF. On the integration of victim surveys and police data: the case of the Netherlands. The Hague: Statistical Unit, Research Centre (WODC), Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands; Forthcoming.
Soares RR. Development, crime, and punishment: accounting for the international differences in crime rates. J Dev Econ. 2004;73(1):155–84.
Soares RR, Naritomi J. Understanding high crime rates in Latin America: the role of social and policy factors. In: Di Tella R, Edwards S, Schargrodsky E, editors. The economics of crime: lessons for and from Latin America. Chicago: National Bureau of Economic Research and the University of Chicago Press.; 2010.
Sozzo M. ¿Contando el delito? Análisis crítico y comparativo de las encuestas de Victimización en Argentina. OAS Working Paper. Washington, DC: Organization of America States; 2003.
Tarling R, Morris K. Reporting crime to the police. Br J Criminol. 2010;50:474–40.
Tolsma J, Blaauw J, Grotenhuis M. When do people report crime to the police? Results from a factorial survey Design in the Netherlands, 2010. J Exp Criminol. 2012;8(2):117–34.
Unidad de Información Criminológica de la Dirección de Política Criminal de la Fiscalía General del Estado. Delitoscopio Informe Estadístico, Quito; 2015
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Manual Para Encuestas de Victimización. Geneva: United Nations Geneva; 2010.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Global Study on Homicide 2018. Vienna; 2018.
Van Dijk JJ. Als de Dag van Gisteren. Over de Betrouwbaarheid van het Slachtofferverhaal. Justitie¨le Verkenningen. 1992;18:47–65.
Van Dijk J, Van Kesteren J, Smit P. Criminal victimisation in international perspective: key findings from the 2004–2005 ICVS and EU ICS. Boom Juridische Uitgevers, Reeks Onderzoek en Beleid No. 257; 2008
Zakula BF. La cifra oscura y las razones de la no denuncia en México. Centro de Excelencia para Información Estadística de Gobierno, Victimización, Seguridad Pública y Justicia; 2015