The Cost Factor in Patent Systems
Tóm tắt
The objective of this paper is to assess to what extent the cost of patenting affects the demand for patents. The empirical analysis, which focuses on the patent systems of the USA, Japan, and Europe in 2003, leads to the following methodological and empirical conclusions: (1) for a proper international comparison, the size of the market and the average number of claims included in a patent must be accounted for; (2) when the cost per claim per capita (the 3C-index) is considered, a negative linear relationship appears between the cost of patenting and the number of claims that are filed; (3) after the grant of a patent by the EPO, the translation, validation and transaction costs induced by an effective protection in several European countries witness a highly fragmented and very expensive European market for intellectual property; (4) for a patent designating 13 European countries, the 3C-index is about ten (two) times higher than in the US (Japanese) system (for process and translation costs up to the grant); (5) The European market being more than twice as large as the US market in terms of inhabitants, the 3C-index suggests that there would be a clear justification for higher nominal examination fees at the EPO, that would ensure the pursuit of a rigorous granting process.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Archontopoulos, E., Guellec, D., Stevensborg, N., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., and van Zeebroeck, N., “When small is beautiful: Measuring the evolution and consequences of the voluminosity of patent applications at the EPO,” Information Economics and Policy, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 103–132, 2007.
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., and Gambardella, A., Markets for technology. MIT Press (Cambridge), p. 338, 2001.
de Rassenfosse, G. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., “Per un pugno di dollari: A first look at the price elasticity of patents,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 588–604, 2007.
Dernis, H., Guellec, D., and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., “Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output,” STI Review, vol. 27, pp. 129–146, 2001 (OECD).
Duguet, E. and Kabla, I., “Appropriation strategy and the motivations to use the patent system: an econometric analysis at the firm level in French manufacturing,” Annales d’Economie et de Statistique, vol. 49/50, pp. 289–327, 1998.
Grupp, H. and Schmoch, U., “Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: New legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation,” Research Policy, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 377–396, 1999.
Guellec, D. and Martinez, C., Overview of recent trends in patent regimes in United States, Japan and Europe. OECD (Paris), 2003.
Guellec, D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., “Applications, grants and the value of patents,” Economic Letters, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 109–114, 2000.
Guellec, D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., The economics of the European patent system. Oxford University Press (Oxford), p. 250, 2007.
Hall, B. H., Graham, S. H. and Harhoff, D., Prospects for Improving U.S. Patent Quality via Post-grant Opposition, NBER Working Papers, 9731, 2003.
Harhoff, D. and Wagner, S., Modelling the duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office, CEPR Discussion Papers, 5283, 2006.
Jaffe, A. and Lerner, J., Innovation and its discontents—How our broken patent system is endangering innovation and progress, and what to do about it. Princeton University Press (Princeton), p. 236, 2004.
Lazaridis, G. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., “The rigour of EPO’s patentability criteria: An insight into the “induced withdrawals”,” World Patent Information, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 317–326, 2007.
Lemley, M., Rational ignorance at the patent office. The Berkeley Law & Economics Working Papers, 2000(2), p. 40, 2001.
OECD, Compendium of Patent Statistics, OECD, Directorate for Science and Technology, Paris, p. 61, 2005.
Peeters, C. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., “Innovation strategy and the patenting behavior of firms,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 109–135, 2006.
Quillen, C. and Webster, O., “Continuing patent applications and performance of the U.S. Patent Office,” Federal Circuit Bar Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2001.
Quillen, C., Webster, O., and Eichmann, R., “Continuing patent applications and performance of the US Patent and Trademark Office—Extended,” Federal Circuit Bar Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–55, 2002.
Rivette, K. and Kline, D., Rembrandts in the attic: Unlocking the hidden value of patents. Harvard Business School Press (Boston), p. 221, 2000.
Roland, B., Study on the cost of patenting in Europe, prepared on behalf of the EPO by Roland Berger Market Research (available on the EPO website), 2005.
Stevnsborg, N. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., “Patenting procedures and filing strategies at the EPO, Chapter 6,” in Guellec, D. and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (eds.), The Economics of the European Patent System. Oxford (Oxford University Press), pp. 155–183, 2007.
Tong, X. and Frame, J.D., “Measuring national technological performance with patent claims data,” Research Policy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 133–141, 1994.
van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. and van Zeebroeck, N., “A brief history of space and time: The scope-year index as a patent value indicator based on families and renewals,” Scientometrics, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 319–338, 2008.
van Zeebroeck, N., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. and Guellec, D., “Claiming more: the increased voluminosity of patent applications and its determinants,” CEPR Discussion paper 5971, 2006a.
van Zeebroeck, N., van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B., and Han, W., “Issues in measuring the degree of technological specialisation with patent data,” Scientometrics, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 481–492, 2006b.