The Core-Periphery Problem in Communication Research: A Network Analysis of Leading Publication

Azoulay P, Stuart T, Wang Y. Matthew: effect of fable? Manag Sci. 2013;60(1):92–109.

Barabási AL. Network science. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.

Barabási AL. Linked. The new science of networks. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing; 2002.

Barabási AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999;286:509–12.

Bonitz M, Bruckner E, Scharnhorst A. Characteristics and impact of the Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics. 1997;40(3):407–22.

Brandes U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J Math Sociol. 2001;25(2):163–77.

Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S. Models and methods in social network analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.

Fruchterman TMJ, Reingold EM. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Softw Pract Exp. 1991;21(11):1129–64.

Guerrero-Bote VP, Moya-Anegón F. A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: the SJR2 indicator. J Informetr. 2012;6(2012):674–88.

Hudson J. An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details. Scientometrics. 2016;109:871–89.

Kleinberg JM. Authorative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J ACM. 1999;46(5):604–32.

Knobloch-Westerwick S, Glynn CJ, Michael H. The Matilda effect in science communication: an experiment on gender bias in publication quality perceptions and collaboration interest. Sci Commun. 2013;35(5):603–25.

Kozak M, Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L. How have the Eastern European countries of the former Warsaw Pact developed since 1990? A bibliometric study. Scientometrics. 2015;102:1101–17.

Lee C, Sohn D. Mapping the social capital research in communication: a bibliometric analysis. J Mass Commun Q. 2016;94(4):728–49.

Makkonen T, Mitze T. Scientific collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states: did joining the European Union make a difference? Scientometrics. 2016;106:1193–215.

Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science. The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science. 1968;159(3810):56–63.

Missaoui R, Sarr I. Social network analysis—community detection and evolution. London: Springer; 2014.

Paolucci M, Grimaldo F. Mechanism change in a simulation of peer review: from junk support to elitism. Scientometrics. 2014;99:663–88.

Perc M. The Matthew effect in empirical data. J R Soc Interface. 2014;11:20140378.

Schmoch U, Schubert T. Are International co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics. 2008;74(3):361–77.

Scott J. Social network analysis. A handbook. London: Sage; 2000.

Siversten G. Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics. 2016;107:357–68.

Teodorescu D, Tudorel A. The growth of international collaboration in East European scholarly communities: a bibliometric analysis of journal articles published between 1989 and 2009. Scientometrics. 2011;89:711–22.

van den Besselaar P, Sandström U. Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers: a longitudinal case study. Scientometrics. 2015;106:143–62.

Vinkler P. Correlation between the structure of scientific research, scientometric icdicators and GDP in EU and non-EU countries. Scientometrics. 2008;74(2):237–54.

Zanotto SR, Haeffner C, Guimaraes JA. Unbalanced international collaboration affects adversely the usefulness of countries’ scientific output as well as their technological and social impact. Scientometrics. 2016;109:1789–814.